Re: Quick question about SSL

decides (at the FBI end) which
conversations to continue listening to.

I'm sure law-enforcement will be able to dynamically configure their
connection to the phone companies' networks.

And probably cheat to use ECHELON to direct this programmatic control,
yielding no effective monitoring limit for domestic law-enforcement, and
domestic political control.

Law enforcement has absolutely no need for the Digital Telephony Act except
to give them their own access terminals and PRETEND there is a firewall
between what the Military is doing versus what the FBI is doing.

Of course, to monitor phone calls at full capacity,
the FBI will need to use Military surveillance software.

We've come a long way from requiring a person to listen to the first minute
of conversation to even decide whether the person could continue to monitor.

It's a brave new world now.


We're there.


Surprise.



******************************************************************************


Australian ECHELON Spotted
---------- ------- -------

* http://www.texemarrs.com, Living Truth Ministries 800/234-9673

Texe Marrs and his organization are big on the "Anti-Christ" aspects of all
the technology the UKUSA governments have deployed to monitor people.

I am just glad he knows the Beast when he sees it, that it is Evil (without
the people involved necessarily being evil in intent: agreed!) and that
unless we do something soon, it will be too late: Earth will become Hell.

His book-jacket bio: Texe Marrs was a career U.S. Air Force officer (retired).
He com


.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast