Re: certificates naming conventions
- From: Francois Grieu <fgrieu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:21:22 GMT
: * According to our sources, this duplicitous, reciprocal arrangement
: * disguises the most massive, and illegal, domestic espionage apparatus
: * in the world. Not even the Soviets could touch the U.K.-U.S. intercept
: * technology.
: *
: * Through this charade, the intelligence services of each country can
: * claim they are not targeting their own citizens. This targeting is
: * done by an authorized foreign agent, the intelligence liaison
: * resident in Britain or the United States.
: *
: * Thus, in 1977, during an investigation by the House Government
: * Operations Committee, Admiral Inman could claim, with a straight face,
: * that "there are no U.S. Citizens now targeted by the NSA in the United
: * States or abroad, none."
: *
: * Since the targeting was done not by NSA but by employees of British
: * GCHQ, he was literally telling the truth.
[snip]
: *
: * According to a former special agent of the FBI, the you-spy-on-mine,
: * I'll-spy-on-yours deal has been extended to other Western partners,
: * particularly Canada and Australia. The British, with the help of
: * sophisticated NSA computers, can bug just about anyone anywhere.
.
- References:
- certificates naming conventions
- From: MajorSoul
- Re: certificates naming conventions
- From: Francois Grieu
- Re: certificates naming conventions
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: certificates naming conventions
- From: Francois Grieu
- certificates naming conventions
- Prev by Date: Re: who breathes above, when Jonas slams the middle-class boat v the colony
- Next by Date: Re: I am etc weekly, so I credit you.
- Previous by thread: Re: certificates naming conventions
- Next by thread: Re: certificates naming conventions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading