Re: Suggested killfile rules for recent attack
- From: Peter Pearson <ppearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 06:00:46 GMT
overlay.
Digitized signatures? I've started signed 'X' for UPS, since they'll post
your signature to the Internet.
Well, at least there's no biometric information!
Is there?
* How convenient that only 7 months after Sandia scored the drivers
* license contract, DPS decides it will quietly (without any vote)
* implement rules requiring fingerprinting and barcoding on Alabama
* drivers licenses -- which Sandia specializes in -- just like they are
* doing in Communist China!
*
* Your papers, Comrade! (When can we expect the police with machine
* guns to examine our cards to protect us from counterfeiters?)
*
* The press release only mentions that Alabama gave a contract to produce a
* "holographic" driver's license to Sandia Labs.
*
* It mentions nothing about fingerprints, computers or barcodes. Where does
* anyone use a "counterfeit driver's license"? If Driver's Licenses were what
* they are claimed to be (to "protect" us from unsafe drivers), instead of
* for IDENTIFICATION by the government, there would be no value in having
* a fake, would there? Are we being "protected" or is the government just
* making sure it can fully identify and control its slaves?
*
* ************ V *****************
* DEATH TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER
* **********************************
* Dr. Linda Thompson
* Attorney at Law
* Chairman, American Justice Federation
* Internet: lindat@iqu
.
- References:
- Suggested killfile rules for recent attack
- From: Peter Pearson
- Suggested killfile rules for recent attack
- Prev by Date: Re: I am etc weekly, so I credit you.
- Next by Date: Re: certificates naming conventions
- Previous by thread: Re: Suggested killfile rules for recent attack
- Next by thread: Re: Suggested killfile rules for recent attack
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|