Re: Suggested killfile rules for recent attack
- From: Peter Pearson <ppearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 03:59:34 GMT
by all local police
in their cars when they pull you over.
]
* Originally the government told us that the law requiring us to get a
* driver's licenses was to "protect" us, to make sure people could drive.
*
* Now we know better. For example, as long as the government calls you a
* "deadbeat dad," it can "revoke" your driver's license. What does this
* have to do with making the roads safe? Nothing. Licensing isn't about
* "protecting" us from anything, it is about CONTROLLING us. Our
* "servants" have become dictators.
*
* In a FREE COUNTRY, the public servants do not dictate to the people.
* Folks, we ARE NOT FREE.
*
* Remember the lie about Social Security numbers? They were supposedly
* "for our good," too, just to insure that we were signed up in the social
* security program for our retirement in years to come, right? The old
* cards said, "Not for identification purposes." Now, you can't get a
* BANK ACCOUNT without one, and your money and financial transactions are
* reported to goons
.
- References:
- Suggested killfile rules for recent attack
- From: Peter Pearson
- Suggested killfile rules for recent attack
- Prev by Date: Re: @@@@@ KILLFILE RULES FOR "HIPCRIME" POSTS ON SCI.CRYPT @@@@@
- Next by Date: Re: certificates naming conventions
- Previous by thread: Re: Suggested killfile rules for recent attack
- Next by thread: Re: Suggested killfile rules for recent attack
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|