Re: Cryptology Arguments - adacrypt

On Jun 30, 8:08 pm, Stefan Tillich <stefa...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry for feeding, but that is just too hilarious.





AdaCrypt wrote:
On Jun 30, 2:29 pm, David Eather <eat...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

OK, since you know what the weakness with AES (and similar ciphers) is,
perhaps you will demonstrate how to crack it?

Remember that you made this claim- no one else.

If full AES is too hard maybe you can crack just half the rounds? Or
can you crack 3 rounds?

Show it, and then you will have done something memorable and great or
you could keep posting rubbish.

< Data Structure Surfacing in Ciphertext.

<"With hindsight this was a mistake because no matter how strong
intellectually
<cryptographers were in their design strategy the structure of the
data in number
<theoretic cipher-text just would not allow itself to be hidden and to
this day it
<continues to surface in the most well designed ciphers such as AES
and RSA,
<granted to a much less extent but sufficient to always attract
cryptanalysis just the <same. "

Two days prior to this a reader had posted an article announcing the
reading of a paper at a conference of the IACR the subject matter of
which is 'time periodicity' that has ominously surfaced in a sample of
AES ciphertext that the person ( in IACR) was able to demonstrate.

It's hard to imagine, that anyone could be more unspecific in citing a
source. Referring to some "two day prior posting" on a group currently
being flooded by some idiot does it make rather hard to find (especially
if you didn't come around to install/update your filters). You might
want to be a little more specific on that paper?> " another nail in the coffin of AES is among other remarks that were
made at the time" by the member of sci crypt..

The fact that the reviewers in IACR were satisfied that there was
enough substance in the submission document of the reader person to
allow the document to be published by Springer Varlag in the magazine
"Lecture Notes for Computer Sciencists" is, in my view, tantamount to
giving it enough credence for quoting in Sci crypt (at least) by both
myself and the original readers posting. My own remarks were and still
are, that this is structure per se in a sample of AES.

It is astounding that you have - concerning those posts of you I did
read - so far shown great resistance against any objective discussion of
your ideas. Quite the contrary, you have gone on trying to discard the
whole bulk of cryptologic research up to this point as inferior to your
"vector cryptography". So even if this paper shows these weaknesses in
AES the way you want them to be (which seems very doubtful with the
cryptological knowledge you have shown so far), it is funny to see you
immediately trusting this scientific work, when you go around and ditch
all the rest.

Reminds me of the conspiracy guys, which discard any evidence coming
from governmental sources as faked, except if they think they can spot
[a UFO / the grassy knoll shooter / Elvis / ...] on there, in which case
the origin from a governmental source is used as undenieable proof of
authenticity of whatever they see.

[rest snipped]

Regards,

Stefan- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I don't profess to be any kind of crypto guru but I must admit I think
that the status quo in cryptography is a case of " Bumph propagates
Bumph" and although I have great regard for the mathematical challenge
of cryptology I really believe that today's situation is a cascading
of errors that has gone on and on, undetected. Nobody has stood back
long enough to ask " is there something else we should be trying". I
respect the people in Sci crypt but frankly I have little time for the
establishment and I am convinced that there is just one form of
cryptography that will eventually make all else redundant. I have
laboured vector cryptography a lot and I think that it is so obvious
mathematically that I just cannot understand why there is any
hesitation on the part of you professionals to agreeing wholly with
what I am expounding. Whatever your roles in the industry may be you
should all have enough opportunism left in you from your study days to
recognise intuitively a new algorithm and new encryption data as
instinctively viable. Instead of that I am having to fight all the
way as if I was a criminal interloper. May be I am too to some people
- adacrypt

.

Relevant Pages

  • sci.crypt.research FAQ
    ... Before posting, you may want to consider if your ... the relationship between cryptography and government), ... GUIDELINES FOR POSTING NEW ENCRYPTION SCHEMES TO SCI.CRYPT.RESEARCH ... implement or simulate your algorithm. ...
    (sci.answers)
  • sci.crypt.research FAQ
    ... Before posting, you may want to consider if your ... the relationship between cryptography and government), ... GUIDELINES FOR POSTING NEW ENCRYPTION SCHEMES TO SCI.CRYPT.RESEARCH ... implement or simulate your algorithm. ...
    (sci.answers)
  • sci.crypt.research FAQ
    ... Before posting, you may want to consider if your ... the relationship between cryptography and government), ... GUIDELINES FOR POSTING NEW ENCRYPTION SCHEMES TO SCI.CRYPT.RESEARCH ... implement or simulate your algorithm. ...
    (sci.answers)
  • sci.crypt.research FAQ
    ... Before posting, you may want to consider if your ... the relationship between cryptography and government), ... GUIDELINES FOR POSTING NEW ENCRYPTION SCHEMES TO SCI.CRYPT.RESEARCH ... implement or simulate your algorithm. ...
    (sci.answers)
  • sci.crypt.research FAQ
    ... Before posting, you may want to consider if your ... the relationship between cryptography and government), ... GUIDELINES FOR POSTING NEW ENCRYPTION SCHEMES TO SCI.CRYPT.RESEARCH ... implement or simulate your algorithm. ...
    (sci.answers)