Re: Cryptology Arguments - adacrypt

On Jun 30, 2:29 pm, David Eather <eat...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK, since you know what the weakness with AES (and similar ciphers) is,
perhaps you will demonstrate how to crack it?

Remember that you made this claim- no one else.

If full AES is too hard maybe you can crack just half the rounds? Or
can you crack 3 rounds?

Show it, and then you will have done something memorable and great or
you could keep posting rubbish.

< Data Structure Surfacing in Ciphertext.

<"With hindsight this was a mistake because no matter how strong
intellectually
<cryptographers were in their design strategy the structure of the
data in number
<theoretic cipher-text just would not allow itself to be hidden and to
this day it
<continues to surface in the most well designed ciphers such as AES
and RSA,
<granted to a much less extent but sufficient to always attract
cryptanalysis just the <same. "

Two days prior to this a reader had posted an article announcing the
reading of a paper at a conference of the IACR the subject matter of
which is 'time periodicity' that has ominously surfaced in a sample of
AES ciphertext that the person ( in IACR) was able to demonstrate.

" another nail in the coffin of AES is among other remarks that were
made at the time" by the member of sci crypt..

The fact that the reviewers in IACR were satisfied that there was
enough substance in the submission document of the reader person to
allow the document to be published by Springer Varlag in the magazine
"Lecture Notes for Computer Sciencists" is, in my view, tantamount to
giving it enough credence for quoting in Sci crypt (at least) by both
myself and the original readers posting. My own remarks were and still
are, that this is structure per se in a sample of AES.

Extending my claim of discernible structure in a sample of AES to
imply that I can easily crack AES is a poisonous piece of
prevarication on your part and not at all in the interests of Sci
crypt. The person who made the original posting obviously meant well
as I did to this being a curio sign that might have ongoing
ramifications to AES and be of interest to the readers of Sci crypt.-

My remarks still stand - this is a sign of the encryption-data
structure surfacing in ciphertext - no matter how weak - it is there
and can be developed by cryptanalysts.
- adacrypt

Who are you anyway ?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cryptology Arguments - adacrypt
    ... If full AES is too hard maybe you can crack just half the rounds? ... <cryptographers were in their design strategy the structure of the ... Reminds me of the conspiracy guys, which discard any evidence coming from governmental sources as faked, except if they think they can spot ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Cryptology Arguments - adacrypt
    ... perhaps you will demonstrate how to crack it? ... AES ciphertext that the person was able to demonstrate. ... made at the time" by the member of sci crypt.. ... myself and the original readers posting. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Cryptology Arguments - adacrypt
    ... If full AES is too hard maybe you can crack just half the rounds? ... Two days prior to this a reader had posted an article announcing the ... made at the time" by the member of sci crypt.. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Cryptology Arguments - adacrypt
    ... perhaps you will demonstrate how to crack it? ... AES bleeds like a stuck pig. ... seeing the forest for the trees. ... As far as real content, efficiency of encryption, the AES shoehorn is ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Faster way to use RSA...
    ... compete with AES and be reliable. ... explore a dynamic RSA type ... >> ciphertext without knowledge of the public key, ... as the attacker can just try all small d's. ...
    (sci.crypt)