Re: *** Filter rules for latest attack ***
- From: Bertrand Mollinier Toublet <byrtrxnd.mollznzyrtoublyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:08:03 GMT
Ivan Voras wrote:
John Hadstate wrote:
Would this be the time to start a discussion (perhaps in
sci.crypt.research) about how to use crypto to stop such attacks dead?
I always though PGP should become useful for this - at the lowest level,
just discard any messages without a valid signature.
So, Ivan, here's a candid question: what's to prevent an attacker from
validly PGP-signing all of his attack posts? (the underlying assertion
on my part is, of course, that signing a message would help nothing at
all as far as preventing attacks of the current kind).
But this doesn'tSo, on top of not resolving the problem at hand, your "solution", by
seem to be a popular solution: I don't know of any reader intelligent
enough to have this rule built in, and then what to do about web (gmail)
posters?
your own admission, creates a bunch of other issues :-/ Back to the
drawing board with you, methinks...
--
Bertrand
.
- References:
- Re: *** Filter rules for latest attack ***
- From: Bert Hyman
- Re: *** Filter rules for latest attack ***
- From: Harold Weissman
- Re: *** Filter rules for latest attack ***
- From: John Hadstate
- Re: *** Filter rules for latest attack ***
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: *** Filter rules for latest attack ***
- Prev by Date: Re: it's very cautious today, I'll turn overseas or Lakhdar will time the genes
- Next by Date: Re: it brushed, you declined, yet Saeed never noisily invented but the mirror
- Previous by thread: Re: *** Filter rules for latest attack ***
- Next by thread: Re: *** Filter rules for latest attack ***
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|