Re: The Show goes on Just the Same - despite the spam attacks
- From: Bruce Stephens <bruce+usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 18:41:17 +0100
AdaCrypt <austein.obyrne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]
Numerical analysis is categorically not possible on vector data.
That'll be a shock to numerical analysts (who've been doing numerical
linear algebra for decades).
I think I see what is causing you confusion.
1) The three large integers that comprise the visible cipehertext have
within them another set of three mumbers that are the 'real'
ciphertext.
Why three?
Presumably you regard one-component vectors as scalars, so you think
they're inherently insecure. And you seem to be arguing that your
cryptography (whatever it actually is) with three-component vectors is
completely secure.
That immediately suggests a couple of questions: what about two
component vectors, and what about 5-component vectors or 729-component
vectors?
[...]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- The Show goes on Just the Same - despite the spam attacks
- From: AdaCrypt
- The Show goes on Just the Same - despite the spam attacks
- Prev by Date: Re: Multiplication trick in GF(2^m)
- Next by Date: Re: who did Roxanna listen according to all the sunshines? We can't deal stamps unless Najem will reasonably endorse afterwards
- Previous by thread: The Show goes on Just the Same - despite the spam attacks
- Next by thread: Re: The Show goes on Just the Same - despite the spam attacks
- Index(es):