Re: Attn: real cryptographers - how safe would you be?
- From: "RR" <newspaper.20.broom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:07:14 GMT
all, how do we know that two and two make four? Or that the force of
gravity works? Or that the past is unchangeable? If both the past and the
external world exist only in the mind, and if the mind itself is
controllable what then?
But no! His courage seemed suddenly to stiffen of its own accord. The
face of O'Brien, not called up by any obvious association, had floated into
his mind. He knew, with more certainty than before, that O'Brien was on his
side. He was writing the diary for O'Brien -- to O'Brien: it was like an
interminable letter which no one would ever read, but which was addressed
to a particular person and took its colour from that fact.
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It
was their final, most essential command. His heart sank as he thought of
the enormous power arrayed against him, the ease with which any Party
intellectual would overthrow him in debate, the subtle arguments which he
would not be able to understand, much less answer. And yet he was in the
right! They were wrong and he was right. The obvious, the silly, and the
true had got to be defended. Truisms are true, hold on to that! The solid
world exists, its laws do not change. Stones are hard, water is wet,
objects unsupported fall towards the earth's centre. With the feeling that
he was speaking to O'Brien, and also that he was set
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: real cryptographers - how safe would you be?
- Next by Date: Re: do not cheer nowhere while you're spending like a naval girlfriend
- Previous by thread: Re: Attn: real cryptographers - how safe would you be?
- Next by thread: Re: Attn: real cryptographers - how safe would you be?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading