Re: Attn: real cryptographers - how safe would you be?
- From: Don Stockbauer <donstockbauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 05:36:15 GMT
I mean, that one just stinks of feminism.
--Homosexuality is just another lifestyle choice, completely normal.--
--Homosexuality isn't a choice, it's a genetic reality-- Oh. Okay. So
(leaving aside the obvious fact that those two realities contradict each
other) [my own view is that all sexuality is a matter of choice since it
is not a life-sustaining necessity: what or whom you have sex with -- or
whether you have sex at all -- is optional. I would not be here if it
weren't for sex, true, but if I choose never to have sex, I am still
--here--], when do you want to start teaching this lifestyle
choice/genetic reality in the classroom? What age? Six? Seven? Ten?
Twelve? And how do you want to teach it? Bring in a couple of dykes and
a couple of interior decorators to talk to a bunch of third graders?
--Well, I'm sure I don't know. I'm just Porky/Petunia's mother. They
have experts on cultural diversity and alternative lifestyles now, don't
they? I'll let them decide. Listen, I'd love to chat about this, but I
have a me
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: i should fundamental motorways along with the evolutionary maximum gallery, whilst Carol technically rules them too
- Next by Date: Re: dickie prescribes the wrinkle above hers and surprisingly gathers
- Previous by thread: Re: Attn: real cryptographers - how safe would you be?
- Next by thread: Re: Attn: real cryptographers - how safe would you be?
- Index(es):