Re: Attn: real cryptographers - how safe would you be?
- From: Don Stockbauer <donstockbauer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 08:57:05 GMT
the things on earth, why, if God impart to him some ray of
His essence, will he not be capable of knowing and of loving Him in the
manner in which it shall please Him to communicate Himself to us? There
must, then, be certainly an intolerable presumption in arguments of this
sort, although they seem founded on an apparent humility, which is neither
sincere nor reasonable, if it does not make us admit that, not knowing of
ourselves what we are, we can only learn it from God.
"I do not mean that you should submit your belief to me without reason, and
I do not aspire to overcome you by tyranny. In fact, I do not claim to give
you a reason for everything. And to reconcile these contradictions, I intend
to make you see clearly, by convincing proofs, those divine signs in me,
which may convince you of what I am, and may gain authority for me by
wonders and proofs which you cannot reject; so that you may then believe
without... the things which I teach you, since you will find no other ground
for rejecting them, except that you cannot kno
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Attn: real cryptographers - how safe would you be?
- Next by Date: Re: Judgement Day _2
- Previous by thread: Re: Attn: real cryptographers - how safe would you be?
- Next by thread: Re: Attn: real cryptographers - how safe would you be?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading