Re: Poly1305 vs. UMAC vs. new MAC1071
- From: "Wei Dai" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 02:01:08 GMT
I wrote earlier:
Also, I just noticed "Message Authentication on 64-bit Architectures" by Ted Krovetz (http://eprint.iacr.org/2006/037) which claims 1.1 cycles per byte for UHASH8-128 (120-bit security) on an Athlon64.
I'd like to give an update on this algorithm for those who followed the previous discussion. The algorithm has since been modified a bit and renamed VMAC, and is now described by a draft specification at http://www.fastcrypto.org/vmac/. Performance on 32-bit platforms has also been improved substantially since the ePrint and SAC2006 papers, and I've measured a speed of 3.7 cycles per byte for long messages for VMAC-128 on P4-Northwood with my own implementation (which will be in the next version of Crypto++). (The higher cpb figures in the draft specification are based on the reference implementation.) It should be interesting to do a side-by-side comparison of its performance with Bernstein's upcoming MAC1071.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Book on Pre-MATH for cryptography and cryptanalysis. Reply
- Next by Date: Re: Book on Pre-MATH for cryptography and cryptanalysis. Reply
- Previous by thread: crc32 - couriuos question
- Next by thread: A simple analysis of the cipher being modelled- adacrypt
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|