Re: wanted opinions: Powercrypt 2000 (text encryption)
- From: clark <clark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 15:54:30 -0700
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:32:05 -0500, Mike Amling <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
<snip>
I looked at about 20 of the AES implementation's 538 lines, and it
does not look optimal. But unless you're DJB, it doesn't have to be.
I know who DJB (Dan Berstein) is, and of his many contributions (AES
timing attack, SALSA20, POLY1305, etc) as do most here.
I feel stupid for asking, but it seems you are saying this tongue in
cheek, and I want to get the joke.
"But unless you're DJB, it doesn't have to be." <<< What do you mean?
--Mike Amling
Thanks, Mike.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: wanted opinions: Powercrypt 2000 (text encryption)
- From: Ivan Voras
- Re: wanted opinions: Powercrypt 2000 (text encryption)
- References:
- wanted opinions: Powercrypt 2000 (text encryption)
- From: Arnold Friend
- Re: wanted opinions: Powercrypt 2000 (text encryption)
- From: John E. Hadstate
- Re: wanted opinions: Powercrypt 2000 (text encryption)
- From: Mike Amling
- wanted opinions: Powercrypt 2000 (text encryption)
- Prev by Date: Re: Bite the Bullet for Once and for All.
- Next by Date: Re: Bite the Bullet for Once and for All.
- Previous by thread: Re: wanted opinions: Powercrypt 2000 (text encryption)
- Next by thread: Re: wanted opinions: Powercrypt 2000 (text encryption)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|