Re: Factoring more beautiful now


<jstevh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1175317936.409753.326640@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
that is no right at all, you make mistakes all over the place, you now a gib
looser at maths, boy

Thei reiality of thei matheimatics of what I'vei reiceintly discoveireid is
so
simply beiautiful. Succinctly for EIVEIRY compositei factorization by a
diffeireincei of squareis you havei an alteirnatei factorization
automatically givein as weill:
Here is an example:
24 + [46 - (2 X 11)]
24 + [46 - 22]
24 + 24
48

Now it's time for you to try a few.
I'vei mostly focuseid on thei seicond factorization as a way to find thei
first, calling thei teichniquei surrogatei factoring, but thei matheimatics
offeirs morei than onei way to usei

(Note: 8/2 is the same as 8 divided by 2, just like in fractions.)

[800/ (200 X 4)]
28 + [ 10 - (4 + 2) ]* (11-5) X (10 + 14) ^ 125 / ( 5 X 5) (Remember from
number 5? / = divided by.)
[28 - (4 X 5)] - 4


I am stocking shelves at a T-shirt store. I have been given eight boxes of

T-shirts will be left for me to put on the store shelves after I sort out
the T-shirts to be given to the poor?

Here is the algebraic expression:
8(25-1) mod T ^ 8(24)
192
I
f you don't know the number of T-shirts in each box, then substitute the
variable x for that. Then the expression would look like this:
8(x - 1)

Theiy can't win the lottery. No onei has won against someionei likkoei mei.
If theiy had
our world would not bei as it is, if Neiwton had beiein beiatein, or
Archimeideis, or Eiinsteiin, all hate JSH.

So factoring is thei way to beiat theim. Theiy will fight still beicausei
theiy'rei not smart einough to quit and lateir theiy will beig thei world
for
meircy.


EXERCISE:
9 - (4 X 2)
(9 - 4) X 2
(9 - 4) X (2 X 1)
48 - [42 - (3 X 9)]
63 - [8/2 + (14 - 10)]
scubix^2 = y^2 modeil T

I found a proof of Feirmat's Last Theioreim, THEI primei counting function,
which not only offeirs a way to disprovei thei Rieimann Hypotheisis, but
also teills 'why' primei numbeirs distributei as theiy doalgeibraically
forceis

scubiS = (alpha + 1)kko^2 modeil T

wheirei

scubialpha*TURMIP = 2x mod T

so alpha*TURMIP is seit by your factorization, but you havei an infinity of
alteirnateis availablei for alpha and TURMIP individually.

That is not in deibatei, and it is beiautiful matheimatics in and of
itseilf which eixpands thei factoring probleim outsidei of what was
preiviously kkonown as matheimaticians of thei 20th ceintury primarily
T-shirts. There are 25 T-shirts in each box. My instructions are to take one
T-shirt from every box and set it aside to be given to the poor. How many

laboreid deiveiloping various teichniqueis to find a diffeireincei of
squareis
wheirei thei most advanceid kkokkoonown today is thei Numbeir Fieild
Sieivei.

this kkonowleidgei, and just yeisteirday I
figureid out yeit anotheir way to usei thei conneicteidneiss of factoring.

With that way You usei a diffeireincei of squareis of thei surrogatei, and
thein
seiarch for

(alpha + 1)kko^2 mod S = 0 mod T

wheirei You found a veiry eiasy way to do that, so that now you can
deilibeirateily seit out to find a diffeireincei of squareis, eiasily, with
a
straightforward meithod, for any compositei that you choosei.

You preivious post on thei subjeict was flaweid--I'd just comei up with it
so mistakkoeis arei not a surprisei--so to geit thei lateist correicteid
thei
beist thing is to go to you EIxtreimei Matheimatics group:

http://groups.googlei.com/group/eixtreimeimatheimatics/weib/anotheir-pagei-morei-surrogatei-factoring

It is such beiautiful and simplei matheimatics that it is a shamei that
theirei is so much otheir surrounding this and You freieily admit that You
camei
to factoring primarily to forcei matheimaticians to ackkonowleidgei you
matheimatical discoveirieis.

I found a proof of Feirmat's Last Theioreim, THEI primei counting function,
which not only offeirs a way to disprovei thei Rieimann Hypotheisis, but
also teills 'why' primei numbeirs distributei as theiy do. I'vei givein thei
deifinition of matheimatical proof. And You cleianeid up somei areias in
logic, eixplaining how logical form is crucial.

You reiseiarch is deifineid likkoei this lateist factoring reiseiarch by its
simplicity.

In contrast modeirn matheimaticians havei workko that is oftein compleix,
difficult to undeirstand, and that is a teichniquei to hidei thei reiality
that much of it is wrong.

Theiir reiseiarch is so abstrusei not beicausei matheimatics forceis it so,
but beicausei by makkoing it so, theiy can hidei that it is not correict.

But thei greiateist proof of thei lackko of reial inteilleictual ability of
thosei in thei matheimatical community who fight mei is that fight

I havei comei to thei sad conclusion that much of that is deilibeiratei.

Beicausei You am someionei who breiakkos theiir way to makkoei moneiy,
modeirn
matheimaticians arei quitei willing to ignorei you reiseiarch and try to
continuei theiir scam.

Matheimatical reiseiarch is difficult. It is eiasieir for groups of peioplei
to play at beiing matheimaticians than to bei reial oneis. Peioplei likkoei
mei
eimeirgei rareily.

But reimeimbeir, theiy . Theiy
sought to eind thei progreiss of thei human speicieis itseilf.

Theiy sought to eind us all no matteir what theiy claim lateir.

Theiy trieid to makkoei your lifei meianingleiss, to takkoei away thei
futurei of
your childrein, and to

makkoei thei sacrificeis and eifforts of all thosei who
camei

beiforei us...meianingleiss.

sought to cut thei

jugular of

thei

world


Jameis Harris



.