Re: VMPC
- From: fortune.bruce@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 28 Mar 2007 15:51:56 -0700
On Mar 28, 2:37 pm, Kristian Gjøsteen <kristiag+n...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
<fortune.br...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Although I think that you rarely have an opportunity to observe that
much data before it is re-keyed.
As far as I know, rekeying does not help against the RC4 distinguisher.
I don't know if that is also the case against VMPC.
I admit, I am trying to get this discussed, as when distinguishers get
large enough, it becomes harder to see why this is a real-world
problem.
It isn't a disaster-style problem, but it is hard to see why one would
want to use a currently somewhat broken system when unbroken systems
are available. (I think there are unbroken systems available faster
than RC4.)
--
Kristian Gjøsteen
Thank you, Kristian Gjøsteen
The question was not about RC4, but was about VMPC.
The OP asked about replacing AES or RC6 with VMPC.
Of course, AES is a better choice. But I was trying to generate
discussion on VMPC, which to coin Paul Rubin's description of RC4, is
almost hypnotically simple in its construction.
Like RC4, it is possible to code VMPC from memory.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
- Next by Date: Re: VMPC
- Previous by thread: Re: VMPC
- Next by thread: Re: VMPC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|