Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
- From: Kiuhnm <"kiuhnm03["@]yahoo.it>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 23:51:45 +0200
Francois Grieu wrote:
The method that I described requires knowing consecutive digits
of the product. I think it would be rather painful to extend
to two segments of consecutive digits, and I am ready to admit
that it fails for arbitrary known digits, and that more general
algorithms (LLL..) then need to be called to the rescue.
Yes, my algorithm fails too (it would take too much time).
The digits allowed to change freely break the regularity that my algorithm exploits in order to solve the problem.
Here is a harder problem that's better left unsolved:
xxx4643543xxx*
xxx2432634xxx=
xxx4352345xxx
I think it isn't "linear" anymore.
Kiuhnm
.
- References:
- ANNOUNCE: non more prime numbers
- From: Aspidus
- Re: ANNOUNCE: non more prime numbers
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: ANNOUNCE: non more prime numbers
- From: D.Vantaggiato
- Re: ANNOUNCE: non more prime numbers
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
- From: D.Vantaggiato
- Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
- From: Francois Grieu
- Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
- From: Peter Pearson
- Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
- From: Francois Grieu
- Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
- From: Kiuhnm
- Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
- From: Francois Grieu
- ANNOUNCE: non more prime numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: VMPC
- Next by Date: Re: VMPC
- Previous by thread: Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
- Next by thread: Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading