Re: Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
- From: "Matthew Fanto" <mfanto@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Mar 2007 06:39:58 -0700
On Mar 23, 7:08 pm, Mike Amling <nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Matthew Fanto wrote:
I would hardly call RC4 minimal protection if it's done right, which
it is in SSL/TLS. There are certainly weaknesses in RC4, it is bias,
and everything else, but from a practical standpoint, it's not that
weak in SSL/TLS.
You can make that case for 128-bit RC4, but you don't want to
generalize to include SSL's 40-bit RC4.
That much is obvious. A reasonable assumption to make is that I wasn't
including export grade keysizes in my comments as to the relative
strength of RC4. But I suppose to be entirely precise, I should have
said 128-bit RC4.
-Matt
.
- References:
- Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
- From: MichiMichi
- Re: Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
- From: Matthew Fanto
- Re: Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
- From: MichiMichi
- Re: Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
- From: Matthew Fanto
- Re: Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
- From: Mike Amling
- Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
- Prev by Date: A Font Algorithm- NOt yet named
- Next by Date: Re: A Font Algorithm- NOt yet named
- Previous by thread: Re: Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
- Next by thread: Re: Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|