Surrogate factoring works very well

Nothing like coding a potential factoring solution to see whether or
not it works or not.

The latest code I have is in Java and is available to the world at

http://code.google.com/p/surrogate-factoring/

and it is optimized for small numbers less than 10,000,000 as that's
what I experiment with.

But that is just about the k/T ratio. If you figure out how to adjust
it you can use surrogate factoring for any size number.

What the code can show you though even with small numbers is a method
that is not at all random. And the mathematics behind it shows that
it doesn't really care about number size.

But those are just the facts.

We live in a world of lies. And powerful people who call themselves
mathematicians created the necessity of me finding surrogate factoring
and putting it forward because they decided that human progress was
not important to them.

They decided that humanity had discovered enough mathematics.

No need for any more they decided. No need for any other major
discoveries in mathematics because it was inconvenient for them.

Yes, you can continue to ignore this information. But my progress
continues on coding, and the theory is done anyway:

http://groups.google.com/group/extrememathematics/web/surrogate-factoring

As it is so simple it makes you want to cry, as someone should have
figured it out before, but the people playing at being mathematicians
are like actors playing at being doctors.

But they are like actors who took over a hospital when no one was
looking and then tried to lock out the real doctors, and make no
mistake, these people now are fighting for their lives.

Their fake lives.

So no, Andrew Wiles did not prove Fermat's Last Theorem. Taylor and
Ribet are probably worse at mathematics than your average 12 year old
if you take them out of what they know by rote memory.

And none of them are worth a damn to humanity.

And yes, the facts can shake stock markets no matter what people make
up to explain it as somewhere some people seem to understand who I
actually am, and know what the situation actually is, but stupidly
seem to believe that the "mathematicians" currently in power actually
are intelligent people who can control things versus being dumb actors
caught up in a powerful drama way beyond their intellects.

THEY ARE ACTORS.

I have tried various ideas without success before but hey that is
normal problem solving.

Failures are over. Surrogate factoring is here. Anyone implementing
the simple theory with a will can probably do some serious factoring.

And that means that nations implementing it can possibly do some
serious factoring.

And the United States is the LEAST likely to know that as it is top
dog right now, so has no interest in supposedly lame ideas from a
supposed crackpot.

These kind of stories are how the fate of the world changes and how
dominant nations can be thrown on the crap heap.

Do any of you know your history?

Did you know that in World War II Adolph Hitler was so certain of
German superiority that he refused to believe that the German codes
had been broken, even though they had been?

Rommel had a great effort in Africa, but the Allies had information,
and the will to keep a secret.

A very big secret...

They killed people to keep that secret. They let their own people get
killed to keep that secret.

And the world keeps on turning, life goes on, people keep getting
born, and dying, and preventable catastrophes keep occurring simply
because of willful human stupidity.

People in the end want pain, misery, death and failure because there
is a Death Instinct in the species.

You people want the worst case. You want the world to hurt.


James Harris

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Gist of surrogate factoring theorem
    ... while the surrogate factoring ... > a difference of squares with your target. ... mathematics requirement for physics majors is algebra, calculus, ... of people with this view of mathematics. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: JSH: Nearly done
    ... > theory and method for factoring that I call surrogate factoring. ... > The mathematics though is surprisingly simple, ... but are in the field of rationals. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Nearly done
    ... > theory and method for factoring that I call surrogate factoring. ... > The mathematics though is surprisingly simple, ... but are in the field of rationals. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: JSH: Factoring and residues
    ... I was wrong in thinking that picking x_res and getting k with a chosen ... It's math. ... gcds than the random-gcd factoring method was expected to take. ... using the tools of mathematics. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Ultimate check, new way to factor or not?
    ... > polynomial time. ... Now, factoring is in general hard, with *certain* types of numbers, ... the mathematics or what's possible, but only in trying to dismiss my ... while certain key features of my discovery make it very exciting, ...
    (sci.crypt)