Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio

James Harris wrote:

Practically, if someone were attacking, say, an RSA number, they would
not care so much about looping threw a tremendous number of
combinations if they knew that they'd get the number cracked with one
of them, now would they?

Jeez Louise, you turn missing the point into an art form.

(Here's a hint for you: There is a very obvious way to factor an RSA
number which involves looping through a tremendous number of
something. That obvious way is guaranteed to find all the factors of
the RSA number. So why do you suppose nobody has done so yet?)

-Rotwang

.