sci.crypt

• Thread Index

• Re: Security of 256*256 S-box
  • From: Unruh
• Re: NVIDIA 8800 integer performance
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: NVIDIA 8800 integer performance
  • From: rossum
• Re: New cryptanalysis book coming out!
  • From: Mindraker
• Re: Factoring more beautiful now
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: NVIDIA 8800 integer performance
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Photo of James Harris who posts math con jobs
  • From: stdazi@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: New cryptanalysis book coming out!
  • From: spam
• Re: NVIDIA 8800 integer performance
  • From: Wei Dai
• Re: Factoring more beautiful now
  • From: Noman Lapetos
• Factoring more beautiful now
  • From: jstevh
• Re: JSH: You are SO dumb
  • From: sg552
• Re: Photo of James Harris who posts math con jobs
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: JSH: You are SO dumb
  • From: sg552
• JSH: The Basics of Surrogote Factoring, again
  • From: Schlam Arebic
• JSH: Basically, the true JSHs have always been separate from JSH. I tell you that JSH is a virgin microbe that penetrates with the insistence of air into all the spaces that reason has not been able to fill with words or conventions
  • From: James
• Re: New cryptanalysis book coming out!
  • From: richmlow
• Re: Photo of James Harris who posts math con jobs
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• JSH: Photo of James Harris who posts math con jobs
  • From: biggus
• JSH;Re: Problem with cons, they never quit
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: Almost non-random numbers in a story?
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: JSH: Problem with cons, they never quit
  • From: gjedwards
• JSH: My pet bird Chumley
  • From: jeff
• JSH: engage blocking
  • From: biggus
• JSH: Duck comes back from dead, again
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• JSH: Compressed and Turnipized
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: JSH: Problem with cons, they never quit
  • From: amzoti
• Re: Cryptographic Hash function
  • From: Unruh
• Re: New cryptanalysis book coming out!
  • From: Simon Johnson
• JSH: You are SO dumb
  • From: jstevh
• JSH: Problem with cons, they never quit
  • From: jstevh
• Re: New cryptanalysis book coming out!
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: VMPC
  • From: David Eather
• Re: NVIDIA 8800 integer performance
  • From: Phil Carmody
• NVIDIA 8800 integer performance
  • From: Wei Dai
• Re: Cryptographic Hash function
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Cryptographic Hash function
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Cryptographic Hash function
  • From: SecBoy
• Re: New cryptanalysis book coming out!
  • From: richmlow
• Re: Reversal with surrogate factoring
  • From: Bob Terwilliger
• Reversal with surrogate factoring
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Looking for Rijndael javascript code
  • From: T Driver
• fs module or kernel recompile
  • From: softsubbu.opensource@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: VMPC
  • From: David Eather
• Re: VMPC
  • From: clark
• Re: VMPC
  • From: clark
• Re: VMPC
  • From: clark
• Re: Security of 256*256 S-box
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: VMPC
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: VMPC
  • From: tor
• Re: Primitive polynomials in extended Galois fields
  • From: Anup
• Security of 256*256 S-box
  • From: ashish . sharma . ait
• Re: VMPC
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: VMPC
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: VMPC
  • From: Wei Dai
• Re: VMPC
  • From: David Eather
• Re: VMPC
  • From: fortune . bruce
• Re: VMPC
  • From: fortune . bruce
• Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
  • From: Kiuhnm
• Re: VMPC
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: VMPC
  • From: fortune . bruce
• Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
  • From: Kiuhnm
• Re: Large-Number Math DLL?
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Large-Number Math DLL?
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Primitive polynomials in extended Galois fields
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Primitive polynomials in extended Galois fields
  • From: Anup
• Re: Large-Number Math DLL?
  • From: David Fabian
• Re: Primitive polynomials in extended Galois fields
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: generating a primitive polynom for LFSR
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Primitive polynomials in extended Galois fields
  • From: Anup
• Re: Batch verification via Pippenger's algorithm
  • From: daniel bleichenbacher
• Re: Large-Number Math DLL?
  • From: JR
• Re: Large-Number Math DLL?
  • From: David Fabian
• Re: Surrogate factoring, top to bottom
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Batch verification via Pippenger's algorithm
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Large-Number Math DLL?
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Pentanomial better than trinomial
  • From: Michael Scott
• Re: Surrogate factoring, top to bottom
  • From: Peter Trei
• Re: Pentanomial better than trinomial
  • From: Michael Scott
• Re: Pentanomial better than trinomial
  • From: Michael Scott
• Re: Surrogate factoring, top to bottom
  • From: sg552
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: Peter Trei
• Primitive polynomials in extended Galois fields
  • From: Anup
• Re: generating a primitive polynom for LFSR
  • From: MajorSoul
• Re: ECC scalar multiplication (kP) question
  • From: mm
• Re: Removing extra padding.
  • From: biject
• JSH: filtered, decompressed quotable version
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• JSH: filtered, then compressed for fast read
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• JSH: Properly understanding the situation
  • From: jstevh
• JSH: Psyching myself up
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Surrogate factoring, top to bottom
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: Large-Number Math DLL?
  • From: David Fabian
• Re: JSH: World is complicated
  • From: Michael Press
• Surrogate factoring, top to bottom
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: A Font Algorithm- NOt yet named
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Almost non-random numbers in a story?
  • From: Ilmari Karonen
• Re: VMPC
  • From: Wei Dai
• Re: Removing extra padding.
  • From: Ilmari Karonen
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Amitabh
• Pentanomial better than trinomial
  • From: Michael Scott
• VMPC
  • From: Bartosz Wójcik
• Re: A Font Algorithm- NOt yet named
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: Justin
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Beginner Question:Gnupg Decryption
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: W. Dale Hall
• Re: symmetric encryption under one-time key
  • From: tor
• Re: NegativeEntrophy
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: Beginner Question:Gnupg Decryption
  • From: vedaal
• The: It Is nOT Torture KEy System
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• NegativeEntrophy
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Public Class NegativeEntrophy- the only java class to cause correct and safe encrpption
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Public Class NegativeEntrophy- the only java class to cause correct and safe encrpption
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: A Font Algorithm- NOt yet named
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: symmetric encryption under one-time key
  • From: Eike Kiltz
• Re: A Font Algorithm- NOt yet named
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• A Font Algorithm- NOt yet named
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: Looking for Rijndael javascript code
  • From: Stefan Tillich
• Re: Looking for Rijndael javascript code
  • From: Stefan Tillich
• Re: Kerberos V4
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Kerberos V4
  • From: David Wagner
• Kerberos V4
  • From: charliemason
• Re: Beginner Question:Gnupg Decryption
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Beginner Question:Gnupg Decryption
  • From: MichiMichi
• Re: Beginner Question:Gnupg Decryption
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Large-Number Math DLL?
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Beginner Question:Gnupg Decryption
  • From: MichiMichi
• extend the threshold in secret sharing
  • From: chir0
• Large-Number Math DLL?
  • From: David Fabian
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: Justin
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: W. Dale Hall
• Re: Dividing 512 bit number by 128 bit number in C program
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: Justin
• From SANS: Gozi Trojan Steals SSL Encrypted Data...
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: JSH: World is complicated
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: JSH: World is complicated
  • From: Justin
• Re: JSH: World is complicated
  • From: ttw
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Kiuhnm
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: Justin
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: Excellent Opportunity with the Leader in Internet Security, Bangalore
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: ANNOUNCE: non more prime numbers
  • From: Aspidus
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Kiuhnm
• Re: Looking for Rijndael javascript code
  • From: MichiMichi
• Re: Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
  • From: MichiMichi
• Re: ANNOUNCE: non more prime numbers
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Excellent Opportunity with the Leader in Internet Security, Bangalore
  • From: Charmaine Murray
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Almost non-random numbers in a story?
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Removing extra padding.
  • From: biject
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: sg552
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Kiuhnm
• Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
  • From: Kiuhnm
• Re: Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: daniel bleichenbacher
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: Justin
• Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: World is complicated
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: JSH: World is complicated
  • From: Justin
• Re: looking for DES code in c
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: looking for DES code in c
  • From: rossum
• Re: Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
  • From: MichiMichi
• looking for DES code in c
  • From: shanti
• JSH: World is complicated
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Removing extra padding.
  • From: Ilmari Karonen
• Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: RNG's revisited
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Bill
• Re: Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Beginner Question:Rijndael encrypted value over SSL
  • From: MichiMichi
• Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Looking for Rijndael javascript code
  • From: MichiMichi
• Re: Karatsuba implementation
  • From: Brian Gladman
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Kiuhnm
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: daniel bleichenbacher
• Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: daniel bleichenbacher
• Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
  • From: D.Vantaggiato
• Re: Truncated multiplication (alias XEVRON) (is it secure???)
  • From: D.Vantaggiato
• Re: Karatsuba implementation
  • From: rossum
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Kiuhnm
• Re: RNG's revisited
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Karatsuba implementation
  • From: john . nietzsche
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: ANNOUNCE: non more prime numbers
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Bill
• Re: Removing extra padding.
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: ANNOUNCE: non more prime numbers
  • From: D.Vantaggiato
• Re: ANNOUNCE: non more prime numbers
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: What surrogate factoring theory now says
  • From: Enrico
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Kiuhnm
• ANNOUNCE: no more prime numbers
  • From: Aspidus
• ANNOUNCE: non more prime numbers
  • From: Aspidus
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: rossum
• hi...iam a student from nit warangal india plz help me in linux encrypted file system project...
  • From: softsubbu.opensource@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Bill
• Re: Removing extra padding.
  • From: biject
• Re: What surrogate factoring theory now says
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Cracking Word Sets using Frege's Function
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Frege's Relation as a Cracking Function
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: ECC scalar multiplication (kP) question
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Removing extra padding.
  • From: rossum
• ECC scalar multiplication (kP) question
  • From: s . kartikeyan
• Re: Removing extra padding.
  • From: Antony Clements
• symmetric encryption under one-time key
  • From: tor
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: jstevh
• Re: What surrogate factoring theory now says
  • From: Enrico
• RNG's revisited
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: only password encrypted, all other data unencrypted!
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: What surrogate factoring theory now says
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: only password encrypted, all other data unencrypted!
  • From: qazmlp1209
• Re: Removing extra padding.
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: What surrogate factoring theory now says
  • From: Enrico
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: Jason Pawloski
• What surrogate factoring theory now says
  • From: jstevh
• Re: only password encrypted, all other data unencrypted!
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: jstevh
• Re: only password encrypted, all other data unencrypted!
  • From: Ilmari Karonen
• Re: loop unrolling tricks
  • From: Wei Dai
• Re: only password encrypted, all other data unencrypted!
  • From: Greg Rose
• Re: only password encrypted, all other data unencrypted!
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: loop unrolling tricks
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: only password encrypted, all other data unencrypted!
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Get Serious
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: Karatsuba implementation
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Protecting electronic content
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Kiuhnm
• only password encrypted, all other data unencrypted!
  • From: qazmlp1209
• Re: A security flaw in implementations of the GnuPG program
  • From: Unruh
• Re: A security flaw in implementations of the GnuPG program
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Looking at power of primes as sinecurves.
  • From: jt64
• Re: Looking at power of primes as sinecurves.
  • From: jt64
• Re: Looking at power of primes as sinecurves.
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Looking at power of primes as sinecurves.
  • From: jt64
• Re: loop unrolling tricks
  • From: tum_
• Re: Protecting electronic content
  • From: David Eather
• A security flaw in implementations of the GnuPG program
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: Mark Murray
• Re: Jim Reed's Hagelin Cryptanalysis article
  • From: Greg Rose
• Re: Jim Reed's Hagelin Cryptanalysis article
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Karatsuba implementation
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: loop unrolling tricks
  • From: Wei Dai
• Re: Protecting electronic content
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: rossum
• Re: Jim Reed's Hagelin Cryptanalysis article
  • From: Jeff Dege
• Re: Jim Reed's Hagelin Cryptanalysis article
  • From: Dennis Ritchie
• Karatsuba implementation
  • From: John Locke
• Truncated multiplication (is it secure???)
  • From: Kiuhnm
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Jim Reed's Hagelin Cryptanalysis article
  • From: Jeff Dege
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: W. Dale Hall
• Re: Protecting electronic content
  • From: rossum
• Announce: FreeOTFE and FreeOTFE4PDA v2.00 released
  • From: Sarah Dean
• Re: loop unrolling tricks
  • From: Ilmari Karonen
• TrueCrypt 4.3 Released
  • From: Stan
• Re: Jim Reed's Hagelin Cryptanalysis article
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: A sort of reverse SAT
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Jim Reed's Hagelin Cryptanalysis article
  • From: Greg Rose
• Re: ebook locations
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: A sort of reverse SAT
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: Mindraker
• Re: A sort of reverse SAT
  • From: tor
• Re: A sort of reverse SAT
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: Question on modular algebra
  • From: Dani Camps
• Re: Jim Reed's Hagelin Cryptanalysis article
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Jim Reed's Hagelin Cryptanalysis article
  • From: Jeff Dege
• Re: Big number arithmetic
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: David Eather
• Re: The curve NIST forgot
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• A sort of reverse SAT
  • From: hassan.jameel@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Big number arithmetic
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: RSA Crypto Core
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: rossum
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: Mark Murray
• SPEED workshop in Amsterdam
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Newbie
• Re: Removing extra padding.
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: RSA Crypto Core
  • From: ashish . sharma . ait
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: Bill
• Re: Removing extra padding.
  • From: Bill
• Removing extra padding.
  • From: anurag . choudhary2
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: Enrico
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: gjedwards
• Surrogate factoring works very well
  • From: jstevh
• Re: RSA Crypto Core
  • From: arsonperbuilding@xxxxxxxxx
• RSA Crypto Core
  • From: ashish . sharma . ait
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Big number arithmetic
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: David Eather
• Big number arithmetic
  • From: John Locke
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: SHA1 Thumbprint checks failing on Go Daddy's intermediate certs.
  • From: Elvey
• JSH: You are right, surrogate factoring will not work.
  • From: jslevk@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: SHA1 Thumbprint checks failing on Go Daddy's intermediate certs.
  • From: Eric Smith
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• re:Einstein played dice with the universe
  • From: cansouth
• re:Einstein played dice with the universe
  • From: cansouth
• Re: Hash question ...
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Interactive proof protocols
  • From: anarch
• Re: SHA1 Thumbprint checks failing on Go Daddy's intermediate certs.
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Question on modular algebra
  • From: Mike Amling
• SHA1 Thumbprint checks failing on Go Daddy's intermediate certs.
  • From: Elvey
• Re: Interactive proof protocols
  • From: David Wagner
• Interactive proof protocols
  • From: anarch
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Brute forcing a key
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: OAEP Documentation
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Brute forcing a key
  • From: David Taylor
• Re: loop unrolling tricks
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• loop unrolling tricks
  • From: Wei Dai
• Re: Brute forcing a key
  • From: laura fairhead
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Hash question ...
  • From: Jeremiah D . Seitz
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: bobic
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Newbie
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Silly beginner questions
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Hash question ...
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Silly beginner questions
  • From: Newbie
• Re: thoughts about CBC mode
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Question on modular algebra
  • From: Dani Camps
• Re: Question on modular algebra
  • From: Dani Camps
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: One-Time Pad or XOR speed
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• One-Time Pad or XOR speed
  • From: dcg12345
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: bobic
• Re: Brute forcing a key
  • From: David Eather
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Brute forcing a key
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Brute forcing a key
  • From: laura fairhead
• Re: OAEP Documentation
  • From: Bill
• OAEP Documentation
  • From: ashish . sharma . ait
• Re: JSH: Sobering invention, surrogate factoring
  • From: jshevk@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: JSH: Sobering invention, surrogate factoring
  • From: jshevk@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: JSH: Sobering invention, surrogate factoring
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: side channel attacks
  • From: tum_
• Re: Indirection-free punchscan
  • From: aeessex
• Re: Indirection-free punchscan
  • From: aeessex
• Re: side channel attacks
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Question on modular algebra
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jiahao_anti-addictgamer
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jiahao_anti-addictgamer
• Re: Indirection-free punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• side channel attacks
  • From: shanti
• Re: Indirection-free punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Indirection-free punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Xor encryption
  • From: cvschie
• Re: Indirection-free punchscan
  • From: pulpspy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: ECC FIPS 186-2 Prime Curves coefficient problem
  • From: mm
• JSH: Sobering invention, surrogate factoring
  • From: jstevh
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: bobic
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: bobic
• Re: thoughts about CBC mode
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Indirection-free punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: ECC FIPS 186-2 Prime Curves coefficient problem
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Indirection-free punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: ECC FIPS 186-2 Prime Curves coefficient problem
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Question on modular algebra
  • From: Dani Camps
• secure systems design
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Single mother in need of explanation
  • From: amzoti
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: M Jason Hinek
• Re: ECC FIPS 186-2 Prime Curves coefficient problem
  • From: amzoti
• Re: thoughts about CBC mode
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: ECC FIPS 186-2 Prime Curves coefficient problem
  • From: Bill
• Re: ECC FIPS 186-2 Prime Curves coefficient problem
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: bobic
• ECC FIPS 186-2 Prime Curves coefficient problem
  • From: s . kartikeyan
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Brute forcing a key
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: thoughts about CBC mode
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Brute forcing a key
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: HMAC issues
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: HMAC issues
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: bobic
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: thoughts about CBC mode
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• thoughts about CBC mode
  • From: Antony Clements
• Indirection-free punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Surrogate factoring, potential
  • From: jt64
• Re: Brute forcing a key
  • From: cwilliams28
• Re: Brute forcing a key
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: The curve NIST forgot
  • From: Michael Scott
• Re: Brute forcing a key
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Brute forcing a key
  • From: cwilliams28
• Re: Brute forcing a key
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Brute forcing a key
  • From: David Eather
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: karvaporo
• Re: the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: Peter Pearson
• the bit-length relationship of RSA's key pair
  • From: bobic
• Re: Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• A CRYPTOLOGY EXPERT's future seems secure
  • From: JiXian Yang
• Re: Surrogate factoring, potential
  • From: rossum
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: karvaporo
• Re: Surrogate factoring, potential
  • From: José Carlos Santos
• Re: Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: karvaporo
• Re: The curve NIST forgot
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: HMAC issues
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: HMAC issues
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Antony Clements
• Pragmatic take on surrogate factoring
  • From: jstevh
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jstevh
• Re: The curve NIST forgot
  • From: Michael Scott
• The curve NIST forgot
  • From: Michael Scott
• Re: Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Xor encryption
  • From: Bill
• Re: Xor encryption
  • From: rossum
• Re: Xor encryption
  • From: Bill
• Re: Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: sg552
• Re: Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Xor encryption
  • From: cvschie
• Re: Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Image Encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Xor encryption
  • From: rossum
• Re: Xor encryption
  • From: cvschie
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: karvaporo
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: HMAC issues
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jstevh
• Re: 16 bit crc reverse engineering, problem
  • From: hadez803
• Re: 16 bit crc reverse engineering, problem
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: 16 bit crc reverse engineering, problem
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: HMAC issues
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: xmath
• Re: HMAC issues
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: 16 bit crc reverse engineering, problem
  • From: hadez803
• Re: HMAC issues
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: 16 bit crc reverse engineering, problem
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: HMAC issues
  • From: Antony Clements
• 16 bit crc reverse engineering, problem
  • From: hadez803
• 16 bit crc reverse engineering, problem
  • From: hadez803
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Amitabh
• Factoring q-1/2 reducible to discrete logs mod q ??
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: HMAC issues
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Legrandin
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: David Eather
• HMAC issues
  • From: Antony Clements
• Someone knows Montgomery algorithm.I have some question.
  • From: dolphin
• RSA-1024 verilog
  • From: dolphin
• even better description of algoithm with an attempt at a security proof.
  • From: Antony Clements
• re:Could these 2 newer dentists be mistaken?
  • From: cansouth
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Image Encryption
  • From: rossum
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: rossum
• Re: Image Encryption
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Image Encryption
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Image Encryption
  • From: madhuri
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Dane Smith
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Dane Smith
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Dane Smith
• Re: How much must be revealed
  • From: laura fairhead
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Discrete log Challenges
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Dane Smith
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Dane Smith
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Dane Smith
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Sarad AV
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Discrete log Challenges
  • From: Amitabh
• Discrete log Challenges
  • From: Sarad AV
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: arsonperbuilding@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: JR
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Dane Smith
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• restating question with better description of algoithm
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Dane Smith
• Re: Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Dane Smith
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Varying Ciphertext
  • From: Dane Smith
• Re: JSH: They lie
  • From: jshevk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Factoring has two legs
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Factoring has two legs
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: sg552
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Xor encryption
  • From: rossum
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Factoring has two legs
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: sg552
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Factoring has two legs
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Factoring has two legs
  • From: amzoti
• Re: Hard coded enc key
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Need Help With Decription
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: karvaporo
• Xor encryption
  • From: cvschie
• Hard coded enc key
  • From: momo
• Re: Need Help With Decription
  • From: cvschie
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• Re: The idiots behind naming Douglas ideas 'semantic secure'
  • From: jt64
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: The idiots behind naming Douglas ideas 'semantic secure'
  • From: jt64
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Factoring has two legs
  • From: Enrico
• Re: Factoring has two legs
  • From: Enrico
• Factoring has two legs
  • From: jstevh
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jstevh
• Re: JSH: They lie
  • From: jstevh
• new question
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: karvaporo
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: sg552
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: sg552
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Brian Gladman
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: Zeno
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jstevh
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: karvaporo
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: jt64
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: Unruh
• Simon Johnson, co-author of Cryptography for Developers
  • From: Maxine Sherman
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: Bill
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: JSH: They lie
  • From: sg552
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: sg552
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: The idiots behind naming Douglas ideas 'semantic secure'
  • From: jt64
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Antony Clements
• New direction in ECC efficiency by finite field arithmetic
  • From: alnfrawy
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: José Carlos Santos
• Re: MAC problems
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• MAC problems
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jstevh
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: clark
• Re: JSH: will all the fake JSHs Please Identify themselves? Thanks
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: JSH: will all the fake JSHs Please Identify themselves? Thanks
  • From: David Eather
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: John Hadstate
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: Certificate extensions
  • From: Martin Carpenter
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: clark
• Re: Need Help With Decription
  • From: jt64
• Re: Need Help With Decription
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• What is next semantic secure and IV's lol
  • From: jt64
• Re: The idiots behind naming Douglas ideas 'semantic secure'
  • From: jt64
• The idiots behind naming Douglas ideas 'semantic secure'
  • From: jt64
• Need Help With Decription
  • From: cvschie
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• Re: Elliptic curve embedding degrees
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: So i guess ambiguity PRNG's and password, do not fit your analyse model that well
  • From: jt64
• Re: Ultimate diffusion, decohersion or deattachment.
  • From: jt64
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: So i guess ambiguity PRNG's and password, do not fit your analyse model that well
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: Zeno
• Re: Ultimate diffusion, decohersion or deattachment.
  • From: jt64
• Ultimate diffusion, decohersion or deattachment.
  • From: jt64
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: So i guess ambiguity PRNG's and password, do not fit your analyse model that well
  • From: jt64
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: karvaporo
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: So i guess ambiguity PRNG's and password, do not fit your analyse model that well
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Any attacks on the DB based algorithms so far.
  • From: jt64
• Re: How to Decrypt this ?
  • From: jt64
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: Mark VandeWettering
• Re: How to Decrypt this ?
  • From: Civitas Fenniae
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• Re: So i guess ambiguity PRNG's and password, do not fit your analyse model that well
  • From: jt64
• JSH: will all the fake JSHs Please Identify themselves? Thanks
  • From: jshevk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: I need a demonstration of faith
  • From: biggus
• JSH: I need a demonstration of faith
  • From: jshrsk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Which Ciphers use LTM_DESC (bignum)? More options
  • From: clark
• Re: They sow fear, revulsion, hate, and malignant envy.
  • From: biggus
• Re: They sow fear, revulsion, hate, and malignant envy.
  • From: snookie
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Elliptic curve embedding degrees
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: Hash question ...
  • From: Jeremiah D . Seitz
• Re: Hash question ...
  • From: Jeremiah D . Seitz
• Re: So i guess ambiguity PRNG's and password, do not fit your analyse model that well
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Hash question ...
  • From: Jeremiah D . Seitz
• Which Ciphers use LTM_DESC (bignum)? More options
  • From: julie . medfircon
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: They lie
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: clark
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: How to Decrypt this ?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: So i guess ambiguity PRNG's and password, do not fit your analyse model that well
  • From: jt64
• Re: So i guess ambiguity PRNG's and password, do not fit your analyse model that well
  • From: Zeno
• So i guess ambiguity PRNG's and password, do not fit your analyse model that well
  • From: jt64
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jt64
• Certificate extensions
  • From: MajorSoul
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: karvaporo
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: Zeno
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: Zeno
• Re: How to Decrypt this ?
  • From: jt64
• Re: 16384-bit Encryption Algorithm
  • From: Zeno
• Re: How to Decrypt this ?
  • From: jacquesmostert
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: jt64
• Re: Maybe key ambiguity even better.
  • From: jt64
• Maybe key ambiguity even better.
  • From: jt64
• Re: How to Decrypt this ?
  • From: jt64
• Re: How to use an IV two way encrypted communication.
  • From: jt64
• How to use an IV two way encrypted communication.
  • From: jt64
• How to Decrypt this ?
  • From: jacquesmostert
• Internal state ambiguity, strongest encryption tool
  • From: jt64
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• Elliptic curve embedding degrees
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: arsonperbuilding@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: sg552
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: sg552
• Re: JSH: They lie
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: JSH: They lie
  • From: sg552
• Re: JSH: They lie
  • From: sg552
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Hash question ...
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: NSA releases newly declassified crypto docs
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: NSA releases newly declassified crypto docs
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Hash question ...
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Hash question ...
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Hash question ...
  • From: Jeremiah D . Seitz
• Re: Generating codes like "OTP" tokens do
  • From: Paul Rubin
• JSH: They lie
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: jstevh
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Generating codes like "OTP" tokens do
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Generating codes like "OTP" tokens do
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Generating codes like "OTP" tokens do
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: sg552
• Re: Generating codes like "OTP" tokens do
  • From: jt64
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• Generating codes like "OTP" tokens do
  • From: Myn Seudop
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: Enrico
• Re: NSA releases newly declassified crypto docs
  • From: clark
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• JSH: I have found the problem, it works now, like everywhere, on your sisters the bathroom walls, over there in the left field, why does nobody type overhere anyway? anyone figur that out??? No they should.
  • From: jstevk@xxxxxxxxx
• JSH: My Germ Checking Algoithum, patented and works too
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: jstevh
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jstevh
• JSH: My New Smurf Finding Algorithum
  • From: jstevk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: rossum
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: rossum
• Re: crack this
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: "Firewire cipher" broken?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• "Firewire cipher" broken?
  • From: Eric Smith
• JSH: SF makes the Earth Shake
  • From: jstevk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Proper evaluation of surrogate factoring
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: sg552
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: sg552
• Proper evaluation of surrogate factoring
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: jstevh
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: jstevh
• Re: crack this
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: jstevh
• Re: NSA releases newly declassified crypto docs
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Tim Smith
• NSA releases newly declassified crypto docs
  • From: Alan
• Requesting advice on project proposal
  • From: Edward Leiper
• Re: Security implications of truncating hash values?
  • From: ravallst
• Re: Today isn't the 15th. Virus?
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Security implications of truncating hash values?
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Security implications of truncating hash values?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Security implications of truncating hash values?
  • From: ravallst
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Quadibloc
• Security implications of truncating hash values?
  • From: ravallst
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• Re: JSH: My new code, proven
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: johnny
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• JSH : Why I was born
  • From: jstevk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Today isn't the 15th. Virus?
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: crack this
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• The crazy encryption madmans codebook
  • From: jt64
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: sg552
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: sg552
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jt64
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: Hugh Stenson
• elliptic keys and ASN.1 configuration?
  • From: Bill
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: crack this
  • From: erfn
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• My attempt to break OGR
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Re: JSH: you people are stupid
  • From: rossum
• Re: JSH: My new code, proven
  • From: Hugh Stenson
• Re: JSH: is a virgin microbe that penetrates with the insistence of air into all the spaces that reason has not been able to fill with words or conventions.
  • From: Hugh Stenson
• Re: JSH: you people are stupid
  • From: Hugh Stenson
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Roger Schlafly
• Re: Life IS fair
  • From: jstevk@xxxxxxxxx
• JSH: My new code, proven
  • From: jstevk@xxxxxxxxx
• JSH: is a virgin microbe that penetrates with the insistence of air into all the spaces that reason has not been able to fill with words or conventions.
  • From: jstevk@xxxxxxxxx
• JSH: you people are stupid
  • From: jstevk@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: amzoti
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: Alan
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: rossum
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: mozait
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: alToS
• Re: JSH: So how could they win?
  • From: Hugh Stenson
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Tim Smith
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: JSH: So how could they win?
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: Enrico
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: rossum
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: rossum
• JSH: So how could they win?
  • From: jstevh
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: JSH: Good news!
  • From: Enrico
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Roger Schlafly
• JSH: Good news!
  • From: jstevh
• Re: crack this
  • From: HilltopLab
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: jstevh
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: Moe Trin
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: William Whyte
• Re: crack this
  • From: rossum
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: crack this
  • From: Douglas Eagleson

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• News
• Mailing-Lists
• Newsgroups
• Service
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint