Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)

Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:

Thorsten Kiefer wrote:

Sebastian Gottschalk wrote:

Or maybe you're just taken too few sample points. It should be b>=2.

Of course I took 7 sample points (n=0,2,4,6,8,10,12), and it shows 1.2 <=
b <= 1.3 .

Your values for n are too low, your sample points too dense. Try n=24,
n=32, n=36, n=40 and see how you 'b' jumps high.

OK, I assume b=1.3 and n = 24. According to my formula this will take
24s * 1.3^24 = 13027s = 3.6 hours.

I'll will try that. Maybe I can give you the result tomorrow.

.