Re: PGP 2.6.3ia and the passing of time?
- From: Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 04:08:48 -0700 (MST)
George Orwell <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
I'm really reticent about trying to use this person's
1024-bit public-key.
Paul Rubin wrote:
Why, what do you think might happen?
Thank-you for your reply Paul.
The "person" is actually a corporation , and the corporation
is requiring users to send sensitive data to it via the
Internet (ie. , not via protected internal networks or via
VPN's , SSH , SSL , etc).
This corporation is a high-profile target. If any
of the data is intercepted and decrypted , it could result in
damage to the corporation's reputation (prestige) and
brand-image and possibly cause more direct financial-losses.
The public-key that is to be used is almost ten-years old ,
having been generated in 1997 , and is posted on the
corporation's website (http). The corporation will not
be providing any software or modules for users.
As I mentioned I am reticent , I would not wish to be
in any way responsible for the sending of encrypted data
that might perhaps be intercepted and decrypted easily or
obtained easily in some related way.
I would not think it safe to send data that has been
encrypted in such a way with a key that is close to
ten-years old.
I would not think it safe to trust individual users with the
task of acquiring , installing , testing , and ultimately
using additional software or modules in an attempt to make
their encryption programs in some way compatible with the
corporation's PGP 2.6.3ia.
Would it be wise for what is a high-profile target ,
for a corporation that would be attractive to crackers for
a number of reasons , to be using PGP 2.6.3ia and a
public-key that is nearly 10-years old?
Best Regards.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PGP 2.6.3ia and the passing of time?
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- Re: PGP 2.6.3ia and the passing of time?
- Prev by Date: Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
- Next by Date: Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
- Previous by thread: Re: PGP 2.6.3ia and the passing of time?
- Next by thread: Re: PGP 2.6.3ia and the passing of time?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|