sci.crypt

• Thread Index

---

• Re: disc erasure
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• crack this
  • From: erfn
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: Nomen Lapetos
• Re: How much must be revealed
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: ouah
• Re: Is there any way...
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: rossum
• Re: generating a primitive polynom for LFSR
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Re: Is there any way...
  • From: Studio Janck
• Re: Is there any way...
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Is there any way...
  • From: Studio Janck
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: rossum
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: PGP 2.6.3ia and the passing of time?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: ouah
• Re: PGP 2.6.3ia and the passing of time?
  • From: Borked Pseudo Mailed
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: ouah
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Surrogate factoring, some speculation
  • From: José Carlos Santos
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: bytebro
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: PGP 2.6.3ia and the passing of time?
  • From: George Orwell
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: disc erasure
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Crypting data
  • From: rene . marxis
• disc erasure
  • From: Mark Probert
• Re: Crypting data
  • From: rene . marxis
• Surrogate factoring, some speculation
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Is there any way...
  • From: HilltopLab
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Is there any way...
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: David Wagner
• Is there any way...
  • From: Studio Janck
• Re: Crypting data
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Crypting data
  • From: rene . marxis
• Re: How much must be revealed
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Basics in Cryptography?
  • From: Stjepan F.
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: ouah
• Re: My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: About RSA Cryptosystem
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Blum-Micali construction reverse order
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: tor
• Re: About RSA Cryptosystem
  • From: Amitabh
• My attempt to break Rijndael (SAT-attack)
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Tim Smith
• Re: PGP 2.6.3ia and the passing of time?
  • From: vedaal
• About RSA Cryptosystem
  • From: Jian-jie
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Ref for a proof?
  • From: Amitabh
• Re: Ref for a proof?
  • From: xmath
• Re: Ref for a proof?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: PGP 2.6.3ia and the passing of time?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• PGP 2.6.3ia and the passing of time?
  • From: George Orwell
• Re: Ref for a proof?
  • From: xmath
• Re: Ref for a proof?
  • From: xmath
• Re: Blum-Micali construction reverse order
  • From: longfu84
• Re: generating a primitive polynom for LFSR
  • From: MajorSoul
• Re: generating a primitive polynom for LFSR
  • From: MajorSoul
• Re: generating a primitive polynom for LFSR
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: ouah
• Re: Blum-Micali construction reverse order
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Blum-Micali construction reverse order
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: How much must be revealed
  • From: HilltopLab
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: sg552
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: sg552
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Blum-Micali construction reverse order
  • From: longfu84
• Re: Blum-Micali construction reverse order
  • From: longfu84
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Basics in Cryptography?
  • From: NumberFour
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Blum-Micali construction reverse order
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: sg552
• Blum-Micali construction reverse order
  • From: longfu84
• Re: Basics in Cryptography?
  • From: peter . djalaliev
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: How much must be revealed
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: watermarks/stego
  • From: q404572
• xxtea test vectors
  • From: grahamspam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How much must be revealed
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Large prime for easily finding discreet logs
  • From: Amit
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Basics in Cryptography?
  • From: Stjepan F.
• Re: generating a primitive polynom for LFSR
  • From: MajorSoul
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Large prime for easily finding discreet logs
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Blu-ray encryption brute-forced
  • From: Bertrand Mollinier Toublet
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Outlook Express Digital ID.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: ttw
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Unruh
• Re: How much must be revealed
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: sg552
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: extrasense
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: gjedwards
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: Ivar Rosquist
• Re: Ref for a proof?
  • From: Amit
• Re: Ref for a proof?
  • From: Amit
• Re: watermarks/stego
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Ref for a proof?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Quantum Cryptography can not work
  • From: azeltsman2
• Re: How much must be revealed
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: watermarks/stego
  • From: q404572
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: Tim Smith
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: gjedwards
• Ref for a proof?
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: biggus
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: xmath
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: How much must be revealed
  • From: biject
• Re: How much must be revealed
  • From: HilltopLab
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: José Carlos Santos
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: xmath
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: xmath
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: jstevh
• Re: How much must be revealed
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: José Carlos Santos
• Surrogate factoring and the k/T ratio
  • From: jstevh
• Re: How much must be revealed
  • From: biject
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: How much must be revealed
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• How much must be revealed
  • From: HilltopLab
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: Mark Probert
• Re: Blu-ray encryption brute-forced
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Blu-ray encryption brute-forced
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: xmath
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Alan
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: xmath
• Re: Large prime for easily finding discreet logs
  • From: Amit
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: watermarks/stego
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Outlook Express Digital ID.
  • From: clark
• Re: Indentifying crpytography algorithm
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Indentifying crpytography algorithm
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• About javascript Rijndael and PHP's mcrypt...
  • From: Aleksi Suomalainen
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: ashish . sharma . ait
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Outlook Express Digital ID.
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Outlook Express Digital ID.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Call for Paper-Bulletin of Korean Mathematical Society
  • From: vanilla sky
• Re: Outlook Express Digital ID.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: Outlook Express Digital ID.
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Blu-ray encryption brute-forced
  • From: Mark Probert
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: biject
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: ashish . sharma . ait
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Alan
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: ashish . sharma . ait
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Outlook Express Digital ID.
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Which is the Fastest (Secure) Way to Exchange 256-bit Keys?
  • From: ashish . sharma . ait
• Re: watermarks/stego
  • From: q404572
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: help needed
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Jeff Dege
• Re: help needed
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: help needed
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: biject
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: William Ahern
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: xmath
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Alan
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: xmath
• Re: help needed
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: watermarks/stego
  • From: Dr. Ash
• Re: Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Fastest Signature Scheme for Verification
  • From: ashish . sharma . ait
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Krystian Matusiewicz
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: biject
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Krystian Matusiewicz
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Indentifying crpytography algorithm
  • From: bert
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: biject
• "Tech Now" story on TSD
  • From: James Muir
• Cryptanalysis of the RSA Schemes with Short Secret Exponents from Asiacrypt 99
  • From: Mathias Herrmann
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Audio encryption application for cellphones API
  • From: jetmarc
• Re: Indentifying crpytography algorithm
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Indentifying crpytography algorithm
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Indentifying crpytography algorithm
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: Indentifying crpytography algorithm
  • From: clark
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: biject
• Re: watermarks/stego
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Indentifying crpytography algorithm
  • From: dustin.fineout
• Re: watermarks/stego
  • From: q404572
• Re: Indentifying crpytography algorithm
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Indentifying crpytography algorithm
  • From: bipin . gautam
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Unruh
• New - Most Comprehensive Online Reverse Hash Look-Up Database (MD5 and more)
  • From: thereverendeg
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Unruh
• Re: watermarks/stego
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: biject
• watermarks/stego
  • From: q404572
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: biject
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Shortening the MD2 message digest
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Shortening the MD2 message digest
  • From: kornduff
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: biject
• help me
  • From: mahamasoo
• help me
  • From: mahamasoo
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Shortening the MD2 message digest
  • From: rossum
• Re: Shortening the MD2 message digest
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Shortening the MD2 message digest
  • From: kornduff
• Re: Audio encryption application for cellphones API
  • From: Unruh
• Re: the 2.5.29.14 OID in X.509 certs
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Blu-ray encryption brute-forced
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: help needed
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: help needed
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: help needed
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: help needed
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Blu-ray encryption brute-forced
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Audio encryption application for cellphones API
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: help needed
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Audio encryption application for cellphones API
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: help needed
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Blu-ray encryption brute-forced
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Bjorn Edstrom
• Re: Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Preprocessing a highly redudant message before encryption
  • From: Bjorn Edstrom
• Re: the 2.5.29.14 OID in X.509 certs
  • From: Martin Carpenter
• Re: help needed
  • From: secretcodebreaker
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Drillbit
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Audio encryption application for cellphones API
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: generating a primitive polynom for LFSR
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: help needed
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: help needed
  • From: r.e.s.
• help needed
  • From: mahamasoo
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Unruh
• Brands credentials software released
  • From: anton
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Tim Smith
• Re: generating a primitive polynom for LFSR
  • From: jandersonlee
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: the 2.5.29.14 OID in X.509 certs
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Audio encryption application for cellphones API
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Audio encryption application for cellphones API
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• Re: S/MIME signed emails
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Slow but secure has function for small data
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Blu-ray encryption brute-forced
  • From: David Eather
• Best software library to create PKCS #7 envelopes
  • From: jahrio
• Best way to create PKCS #7 envelopes
  • From: jahrio
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Audio encryption application for cellphones API
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: AvengerD
• S/MIME signed emails
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Audio encryption application for cellphones API
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• Re: Audio encryption application for cellphones API
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Juuso Hukkanen
• Re: Blu-ray encryption brute-forced
  • From: Alan
• Re: Encrypting using private key?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Encrypting using private key?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Blu-ray encryption brute-forced
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• the 2.5.29.14 OID in X.509 certs
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: stefanbanev@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Roger Schlafly
• Re: Audio encryption application for cellphones API
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• Re: PGP Private Key Compermized
  • From: vedaal
• Re: MAC and SSL
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: Encrypting using private key?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Encrypting using private key?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: PGP Private Key Compermized
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: stefanbanev@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: PGP Private Key Compermized
  • From: phyburn
• Re: PGP Private Key Compermized
  • From: Alan
• Re: Blu-ray encryption brute-forced
  • From: Alan
• Re: Encrypting using private key?
  • From: Graham
• Audio encryption application for cellphones API
  • From: jt64
• Possible strengthen crypto secure PRNG
  • From: jt64
• Re: PGP Private Key Compermized
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: MAC and SSL
  • From: Ron Ayoub
• Re: Encrypting using private key?
  • From: phyburn
• Re: PGP Private Key Compermized
  • From: phyburn
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: Encrypting using private key?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Encrypting using private key?
  • From: Graham
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Disadvantage of proposed logger cipher.
  • From: mike3
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Revised streambuddy
  • From: mike3
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: PGP Private Key Compermized
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• PGP Private Key Compermized
  • From: phyburn
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: earlcolby . pottinger
• Re: Encrypting using private key?
  • From: Chris Kushnir
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: MAC and SSL
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: MAC and SSL
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: MAC and SSL
  • From: William Ahern
• Blu-ray encryption brute-forced
  • From: nick
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Encrypting using private key?
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: working on an encrypted disk on my USB pen without admin rights: a problem without solution?
  • From: vedaal
• Re: encoding of PGP keys
  • From: vedaal
• Re: MAC and SSL
  • From: Ron Ayoub
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: MAC and SSL
  • From: Bodo Moeller
• Re: MAC and SSL
  • From: xmath
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: Encrypting using private key?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: xmath
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• MAC and SSL
  • From: Ron Ayoub
• Re: Encrypting using private key?
  • From: xmath
• Re: Encrypting using private key?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: Antony Clements
• Encrypting using private key?
  • From: Debbie Croft
• Re: generating a primitive polynom for LFSR
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: Phil Carmody
• generating a primitive polynom for LFSR
  • From: MajorSoul
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Use cases for hidden services
  • From: Steffen
• Re: working on an encrypted disk on my USB pen without admin rights: a problem without solution?
  • From: Ciofegates
• Re: encoding of PGP keys
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• encoding of PGP keys
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: ECC Koblitz curves: point verification
  • From: Bill
• Re: ECC Koblitz curves: point verification
  • From: Bill
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: tags in asn.1
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: tags in asn.1
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• tags in asn.1
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Interpreting the test result on a RNG
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: xmath
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: stefanbanev@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: xmath
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: xmath
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: reasons for the algorithm
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Extremely disappointed at Eurocrypt 07 reviewers
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: AvengerD
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: AvengerD
• Re: Extremely disappointed at Eurocrypt 07 reviewers
  • From: AvengerD
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Extremely disappointed at Eurocrypt 07 reviewers
  • From: biject
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: xmath
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: fixed... sort of.
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: xmath
• Re: fixed... sort of.
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: security risk of IV in plaintext CBC mode
  • From: kornduff
• Re: ECC Koblitz curves: point verification
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: ECC Koblitz curves: point verification
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• ECC Koblitz curves: point verification
  • From: Bill
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: clark
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: Paul Rubin
• About the exercises for<Cryptography Theory and Practice, Second Edition>
  • From: Jian-jie
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Curious_1
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• reasons for the algorithm
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Entropy experiment
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Clarification about Rijndael
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Interpreting the test result on a RNG
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: fixed... sort of.
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Shannon -- the stream cipher, that is
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: security risk of IV in plaintext CBC mode
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Interpreting the test result on a RNG
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: security risk of IV in plaintext CBC mode
  • From: rossum
• Re: Interpreting the test result on a RNG
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: clark
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: clark
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: clark
• Entropy experiment
  • From: jt64
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: clark
• Re: fixed... sort of.
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: working on an encrypted disk on my USB pen without admin rights: a problem without solution?
  • From: vedaal
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Curious_1
• Re: security risk of IV in plaintext CBC mode
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: working on an encrypted disk on my USB pen without admin rights: a problem without solution?
  • From: Alan
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Curious_1
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Curious_1
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: David Eather
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Interpreting the test result on a RNG
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: security risk of IV in plaintext CBC mode
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: AvengerD
• Re: Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Commercial quantum computer annoucement; relevance to crypto?
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• security risk of IV in plaintext CBC mode
  • From: kornduff
• Disadvantage of proposed logger cipher.
  • From: mike3
• Re: Pegwit
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• fixed... sort of.
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: WebSite is Dying!
  • From: Duder
• Re: some guide
  • From: Timo Schneider
• Re: some guide
  • From: Timo Schneider
• WebSite is Dying!
  • From: frog2000
• Re: some guide
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Unruh
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: clark
• Re: Pegwit
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Curious_1
• Re: Extremely disappointed at Eurocrypt 07 reviewers
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: AvengerD
• Extremely disappointed at Eurocrypt 07 reviewers
  • From: AvengerD
• Re: Same message XORed with different keys each time
  • From: Unruh
• Re: RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Unruh
• Same message XORed with different keys each time
  • From: hassan.jameel@xxxxxxxxx
• RSA Challenge Question
  • From: Curious_1
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: as yet unanswered questions
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: as yet unanswered questions
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: clark
• Re: Revised ARC4 Hash Function Proposal
  • From: clark
• Re: On the Strength of the Strong RSA Assumption
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Revised ARC4 Hash Function Proposal
  • From: Unruh
• Re: On the Strength of the Strong RSA Assumption
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: On the Strength of the Strong RSA Assumption
  • From: radjenef
• Re: On the Strength of the Strong RSA Assumption
  • From: JR
• On the Strength of the Strong RSA Assumption
  • From: radjenef
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: clark
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: David Taylor
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: as yet unanswered questions
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: clark
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Revised ARC4 Hash Function Proposal
  • From: fortune . bruce
• Re: as yet unanswered questions
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: as yet unanswered questions
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: as yet unanswered questions
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Revised ARC4 Hash Function Proposal
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Decryption Challenge
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: Decryption Challenge
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: Revised ARC4 Hash Function Proposal
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Matthew Green
• Re: as yet unanswered questions
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: some guide
  • From: shokoohcpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: One-way function that maps hexadecimal string onto alphanumeric string
  • From: biject
• Re: Revised ARC4 Hash Function Proposal
  • From: rossum
• Re: Decryption Challenge
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: as yet unanswered questions
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: David Taylor
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: as yet unanswered questions
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Revised streambuddy
  • From: jt64
• Revised streambuddy
  • From: jt64
• Re: as yet unanswered questions
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• as yet unanswered questions
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: Decryption Challenge
  • From: beparker
• Re: working on an encrypted disk on my USB pen without admin rights: a problem without solution?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: some guide
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: alexiswarner
• Re: some guide
  • From: Timo Schneider
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: David Taylor
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: working on an encrypted disk on my USB pen without admin rights: a problem without solution?
  • From: Alan
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: John Hadstate
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: tor
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: bytebro
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: Vic Drastik
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: bytebro
• Re: some guide
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: some guide
  • From: Timo Schneider
• Re: some guide
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Algebraic Cryptanalysis ?
  • From: Bob Terwilliger
• Re: Rolling dices
  • From: Lambik
• Re: working on an encrypted disk on my USB pen without admin rights: a problem without solution?
  • From: nemo_outis
• Re: Rolling dices
  • From: Lambik
• Re: In RSA, does knowledge of d%(p-1) and d%(q-1) allow factoring n?
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: some guide
  • From: rossum
• Re: some guide
  • From: shokoohcpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: rossum
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: David Taylor
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: clark
• Re: In RSA, does knowledge of d%(p-1) and d%(q-1) allow factoring n?
  • From: Bodo Moeller
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• In RSA, does knowledge of d%(p-1) and d%(q-1) allow factoring n?
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: David Taylor
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Algebraic Cryptanalysis ?
  • From: Klaus Pommerening
• Re: Terminology
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Rolling dices
  • From: jt64
• Re: Algebraic Cryptanalysis ?
  • From: dullien@xxxxxx
• Re: Rolling dices
  • From: David Taylor
• Re: One-way function that maps hexadecimal string onto alphanumeric string
  • From: jahrio
• Re: Decryption Challenge
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: One-way function that maps hexadecimal string onto alphanumeric string
  • From: jahrio
• working on an encrypted disk on my USB pen without admin rights: a problem without solution?
  • From: Ciofegates
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: One-way function that maps hexadecimal string onto alphanumeric string
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Rolling dices
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• Re: Sr Cryptographer needed in Los Angeles area
  • From: Doug Daly
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Rolling dices
  • From: Duder
• Re: Encrypting a password within an executable
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Rolling dices
  • From: jt64
• Rolling dices
  • From: jt64
• Re: One-way function that maps hexadecimal string onto alphanumeric string
  • From: davvid_a_scott
• Re: Algebraic Cryptanalysis ?
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Encrypting a password within an executable
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Algebraic Cryptanalysis ?
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: Nathan
• Re: One-way function that maps hexadecimal string onto alphanumeric string
  • From: jahrio
• Re: Terminology
  • From: Duder
• Re: Terminology
  • From: jt64
• Re: Terminology
  • From: jt64
• Re: Terminology
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Terminology
  • From: jt64
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Terminology
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Decryption Challenge
  • From: Unruh
• Algebraic Cryptanalysis ?
  • From: dullien@xxxxxx
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: Nathan
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Unruh
• Terminology
  • From: jt64
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Wanted Book "Differential cryptanalysis of the data encryption standard--Biham", Eli
  • From: David Eather
• Re: One-way function that maps hexadecimal string onto alphanumeric string
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: Nathan
• One-way function that maps hexadecimal string onto alphanumeric string
  • From: jahrio
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Encrypting a password within an executable
  • From: rossum
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Decryption Challenge
  • From: Herbert Kleebauer
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Decryption Challenge
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: clark
• Re: newbies need help interpreting Diehard output
  • From: SySiphus
• Re: DSA signing
  • From: GeezerButler
• Re: DSA signing
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Decryption Challenge
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: rossum
• Re: Encrypting a password within an executable
  • From: rossum
• Re: Decryption Challenge
  • From: Duder
• Decryption Challenge
  • From: SimeonArgus
• Re: Encrypting a password within an executable
  • From: Ian Toltz
• Re: Encrypting a password within an executable
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Encrypting a password within an executable
  • From: Ian Toltz
• Announce: CryptaPix 3.0
  • From: Kent Briggs
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Contents of ECDSA X.509 certificate
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Key entropy, stream entropy, block entropy, block population entropy AKA uniique stream length
  • From: jt64
• Re: newbies need help interpreting Diehard output
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: newbies need help interpreting Diehard output
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: newbies need help interpreting Diehard output
  • From: Mr. Politics
• Re: NIST deprecation of sha-1?
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: jt64
• Contents of ECDSA X.509 certificate
  • From: mwavetoll
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: bert
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: jt64
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: jt64
• Re: DSA signing
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: some guide
  • From: rossum
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: rossum
• some guide
  • From: shokoohcpp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: asdf
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Pegwit
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: RNoster
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: HILL CIPHER
  • From: Jeff Dege
• Re: DES
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: computer instruction (population count)
  • From: Quadibloc
• computer instruction (population count)
  • From: Herbert Kanner
• DSA signing
  • From: GeezerButler
• NIST deprecation of sha-1?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: asdf
• Re: newbies need help interpreting Diehard output
  • From: SySiphus
• Re: additional
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: potential break or real break?
  • From: Antony Clements
• HILL CIPHER
  • From: nolamichymoo
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Unruh
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Pegwit
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Large prime for easily finding discreet logs
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: additional
  • From: rossum
• Re: potential break or real break?
  • From: rossum
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: sms encryption
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: Pegwit
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Probability, certainty and natural distribution
  • From: jt64
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: security of "non-random" primes for E(GF(p))
  • From: jandersonlee
• Re: Large prime for easily finding discreet logs
  • From: Amit
• Re: Large prime for easily finding discreet logs
  • From: Amit
• Re: Large prime for easily finding discreet logs
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Large prime for easily finding discreet logs
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: mistake in the math
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Large prime for easily finding discreet logs
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Minimal length of encrypted data - which algorithm?
  • From: davvid_a_scott
• Re: Large prime for easily finding discreet logs
  • From: Amit
• Re: Large prime for easily finding discreet logs
  • From: Amit
• Re: Probabilities
  • From: RNoster
• Re: Probabilities
  • From: RNoster
• Re: Large prime for easily finding discreet logs
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Probabilities
  • From: jt64
• Re: Probabilities
  • From: jt64
• Re: Probabilities
  • From: jt64
• Re: Probabilities
  • From: jt64
• Re: Probabilities
  • From: jt64
• Re: Probabilities
  • From: jt64
• Re: newbies need help interpreting Diehard output
  • From: Mr. Politics
• DES for X11
  • From: Thorsten Kiefer
• Large prime for easily finding discreet logs
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: sms encryption
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• additional
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: potential break or real break?
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: sms encryption
  • From: David Eather
• Re: potential break or real break?
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: mistake in the math
  • From: rossum
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: jt64
• Re: Probabilities
  • From: jt64
• Re: Probabilities
  • From: jt64
• Re: newbies need help interpreting Diehard output
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: security of "non-random" primes for E(GF(p))
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: sms encryption
  • From: Simon Johnson
• security of "non-random" primes for E(GF(p))
  • From: jandersonlee
• Re: potential break or real break?
  • From: rossum
• Re: Probabilities
  • From: RNoster
• Re: potential break or real break?
  • From: David Taylor
• mistake in the math
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Question about Fortuna and repeating blocks
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Question about Fortuna and repeating blocks
  • From: shiteater
• Re: potential break or real break?
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: potential break or real break?
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: potential break or real break?
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: potential break or real break?
  • From: jt64
• Re: newbies need help interpreting Diehard output
  • From: mjt4941
• Re: definition of statistical test for randomness
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: potential break or real break?
  • From: rossum
• Re: potential break or real break?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: potential break or real break?
  • From: rossum
• Re: Pegwit
  • From: David Eather
• Re: sms encryption
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Probabilities
  • From: jt64
• Re: Probabilities
  • From: jt64
• Probabilities
  • From: jt64
• Re: Semantically secure bitwise-XOR malleable cipher?
  • From: jt64
• Re: potential break or real break?
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Curious about semantic security.........
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Question about Fortuna and repeating blocks