Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
- From: bergstrom.henrik@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 29 Jan 2007 03:58:20 -0800
Hi Kristian!
On 29 Jan, 12:37, Kristian Gjøsteen <kristiag+n...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
<bergstrom.hen...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
3. No collisions! I.e. no client should mistakenly identify a result
as his own.Ok as long as the nonce is sufficiently long - 128 bits should do it.
We did consider a similar approach - including a random "correlation
id" in the input message which is echoed back in the output message -
but we need to guarantee that no collisions occur between id:s nonces,
etc., not just offering "high probability" of no collisions. Is it
impossible, or does it just require loads of cpu cycles on the server
or enough bits in the output?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
- References:
- Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
- From: bergstrom . henrik
- Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
- Prev by Date: Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
- Next by Date: Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
- Previous by thread: Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
- Next by thread: Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|