Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- From: Thomas Pornin <pornin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Jan 2007 10:12:11 GMT
According to Jean-Luc Cooke <jlcooke@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Other than that 1 beef, Whirlpool is my choice.
It's quite slow, however. NESSIE clocked the reference implementation
at 113 cycles per input byte on Pentium III, which is very slow.
Performance can probably be improved to some great extent, but I doubt
it will come below, say, 50 clock cycles per input byte. By comparison,
on the same hardware, MD4 is below 5 clock cycles, SHA-1 achieves about
10, and, more to the point, AES encryption can run below 20 cycles per
byte. It is not usual for the hash part of a encrypt-and-MAC system to
be the bottleneck.
--Thomas Pornin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- From: Jean-Luc Cooke
- Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- References:
- New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- From: ~David~
- Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- From: Jean-Luc Cooke
- New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- Prev by Date: Re: Encrpytion software
- Next by Date: Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
- Previous by thread: Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- Next by thread: Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|