Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- From: William Ahern <william@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 15:18:22 -0800
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:01:31 +0000, Jean-Luc Cooke wrote:
Whirlpool. My only beef with it is it's constructed from very similar
building blocks as AES. It would be nice if the winning hash were
constructed from different low-level operations. Other than that 1
beef, Whirlpool is my choice.
I thought there was a consensus in the 2005 workshop that, ideally (given
sufficient independent merit), more than one hash would be chosen, exactly
to mitigate the possibility of a catastrophic break of the "standard".
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- From: Roger Schlafly
- Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- References:
- New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- From: ~David~
- Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- From: Jean-Luc Cooke
- New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- Prev by Date: Re: primes and non-prime numbers
- Next by Date: Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
- Previous by thread: Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- Next by thread: Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
- Index(es):