Re: strength of multiple hash functions
- From: "Amit" <amitabh123@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jan 2007 00:52:06 -0800
true, but thats the topic of an entirely different discussion :)
On Jan 25, 7:44 pm, Kristian Gjøsteen <kristiag+n...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Amit <amitabh...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It is easy to prove (in the random oracle model) that the security
offered by H(.) is the same as that provided by SHA1.In my opinion, a ROM proof offers no interesting insights in this case.
--
Kristian Gjøsteen
.
- References:
- Re: strength of multiple hash functions
- From: Amit
- Re: strength of multiple hash functions
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: strength of multiple hash functions
- Prev by Date: Re: strength of multiple hash functions
- Next by Date: Re: Draft FIPS 186-3, digital signatures
- Previous by thread: Re: strength of multiple hash functions
- Next by thread: Re: strength of multiple hash functions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|