Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen <kristiag+news@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:55:00 +0000 (UTC)
Mike Amling <spamonly@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
With no IV, the messages and ciphertexts have a one-to-one mapping,
which, as with ECB, allows observers to distinguish repeated messages.
I forgot to mention that. Thanks. (This may not matter for some
applications.)
--
Kristian Gjøsteen
.
- References:
- Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
- From: jetmarc
- Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
- From: Mike Amling
- Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
- From: Mike Amling
- Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
- Prev by Date: Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
- Next by Date: Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
- Previous by thread: Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
- Next by thread: Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
