sci.crypt

• Thread Index

---

• Re: affine ceasar
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: Unknown signs at my doorbell
  • From: Amit
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: jiangwu.mail@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: jiangwu.mail@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Unknown signs at my doorbell
  • From: ric
• Unknown signs at my doorbell
  • From: Mednemesis
• Re: Minimal length of encrypted data - which algorithm?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Minimal length of encrypted data - which algorithm?
  • From: SST
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: Dquixote
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Answers to the book "Cryptography Theory and Practice"
  • From: Jian-jie
• Re: Answers to the book "Cryptography Theory and Practice"
  • From: jamesonang@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: affine ceasar
  • From: raedabihanna
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: jiangwu.mail@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Answers to the book "Cryptography Theory and Practice"
  • From: Jian-jie
• Sr Cryptographer needed in Los Angeles area
  • From: Doug Daly
• Re: Pegwit
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Answers to the book "Cryptography Theory and Practice"
  • From: Jeff Dege
• Maybe wrong group, but Vista -driver signing- 'bytes the dust' too it seems :-)
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Bad cryptography, psychics, Randi and Matt Blaze
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: Answers to the book "Cryptography Theory and Practice"
  • From: Jian-jie
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: Answers to the book "Cryptography Theory and Practice"
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Bad cryptography, psychics, Randi and Matt Blaze
  • From: Antti Louko
• Answers to the book "Cryptography Theory and Practice"
  • From: Jian-jie
• Re: Bad cryptography, psychics, Randi and Matt Blaze
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Bad cryptography, psychics, Randi and Matt Blaze
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Bad cryptography, psychics, Randi and Matt Blaze
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Bad cryptography, psychics, Randi and Matt Blaze
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Bad cryptography, psychics, Randi and Matt Blaze
  • From: Antti Louko
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Pegwit
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: Tim Smith
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: Tim Smith
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: bergstrom . henrik
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: bergstrom . henrik
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: bergstrom . henrik
• Re: affine ceasar
  • From: Jeff Dege
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: jiangwu.mail@xxxxxxxxx
• affine ceasar
  • From: raedabihanna
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: Ari
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Jakob
• Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: bergstrom . henrik
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: mikael . brannstrom
• Re: Revised ARC4 Hash Function Proposal
  • From: rossum
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: rossum
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: bergstrom . henrik
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: bergstrom . henrik
• Re: Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: bergstrom . henrik
• Recognising one's own messages on an anonymous broadcast channel?
  • From: bergstrom . henrik
• Re: Password Psychology
  • From: whorton4
• Re: Revised ARC4 Hash Function Proposal
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Revised ARC4 Hash Function Proposal
  • From: Scott Contini
• Revised ARC4 Hash Function Proposal
  • From: rossum
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Vlastimil Klima
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Christian Siebert
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Thomas ***in
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Unruh
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Unruh
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Alan
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Alan
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Alan
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Roger Schlafly
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: clark
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Thomas ***in
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Alan
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Alan
• Re: Blu-Ray hits the dust too :-)
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Juuso Hukkanen
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Blu-Ray hits the dust too :-)
  • From: Quadibloc
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Jakob
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Thomas ***in
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: Dquixote
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: William Ahern
• Re: primes and non-prime numbers
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Mike Amling
• primes and non-prime numbers
  • From: salih.as.istanbul@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Jakob
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: strength of multiple hash functions
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: strength of multiple hash functions
  • From: Stefan Lucks
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: strength of multiple hash functions
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Draft FIPS 186-3, digital signatures
  • From: Marcus Streets
• Re: strength of multiple hash functions
  • From: Amit
• Re: strength of multiple hash functions
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: strength of multiple hash functions
  • From: Amit
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• New hash contest by NIST, similair to AES competition
  • From: ~David~
• Re: Small exponent Pohlig Hellman
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: exukc@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: exukc@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: Dquixote
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Small exponent Pohlig Hellman
  • From: David Wagner
• Small exponent Pohlig Hellman
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Mike Amling
• for vanya: highly appreciated nntp server - uj div radgu - (1/1)
  • From: zedekiah
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Encrpytion software
  • From: exukc@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Draft FIPS 186-3, digital signatures
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Draft FIPS 186-3, digital signatures
  • From: Bill
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Authentication of a messages using a counter and a MAC
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Quartz
  • From: Martin Carpenter
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Encrpytion software
  • From: Dquixote
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Password Psychology
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Password Psychology
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Password Psychology
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: jetmarc
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: Random oracles
  • From: Amit
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: briggs
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Random oracles
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: new unsolved problems web site
  • From: philippe
• Re: Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Blockcipher >256 bit (for hardware implementation)
  • From: jetmarc
• Re: Rekey with CTR mode
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Rekey with CTR mode
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Random oracles
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: new unsolved problems web site
  • From: Scott Contini
• new unsolved problems web site
  • From: Tim S Roberts
• Re: Rekey with CTR mode
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Password Psychology
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: laura fairhead
• Re: Password Psychology
  • From: Harold Weissman
• Re: Random oracles
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Random oracles
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: Password Psychology
  • From: Ben Livengood
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: bert
• Re: Random oracles
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Random oracles
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Random oracles
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: Random oracles
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Rekey with CTR mode
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Ask any human to choice a number between 0 - 0xFFFFFFFF
  • From: Dennis Yurichev
• Re: Rekey with CTR mode
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Random oracles
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: Rekey with CTR mode
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Rekey with CTR mode
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Rekey with CTR mode
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: group signature
  • From: Vicious . vivacious
• Re: Rekey with CTR mode
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Rekey with CTR mode
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Rekey with CTR mode
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Blu-Ray hits the dust too :-)
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: mm
• Re: Password Psychology
  • From: Marc Heusser
• Re: Blu-Ray hits the dust too :-)
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Password Psychology
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: elliptic curve orders of the NIST standard FIPS 186-2 curves?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Password Psychology
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• Re: Blu-Ray hits the dust too :-)
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Blu-Ray hits the dust too :-)
  • From: Ignacio aecbi
• Re: elliptic curve orders of the NIST standard FIPS 186-2 curves?
  • From: Bill
• WEA 2007 Extended Deadline
  • From: camil
• Blu-Ray hits the dust too :-)
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: elliptic curve orders of the NIST standard FIPS 186-2 curves?
  • From: Thomas ***in
• elliptic curve orders of the NIST standard FIPS 186-2 curves?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Password Psychology
  • From: Unruh
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: Unruh
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: mm
• Password Psychology
  • From: Booted Cat
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: Unruh
• Re: RSA keys, encryption and PGP-like cryptosystems
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• A theorem about Kak's "decimal sequences"
  • From: r.e.s.
• RSA keys, encryption and PGP-like cryptosystems
  • From: cwill
• Re: Converting scales of True Random Numbers causes distribution de-uniformization
  • From: jsavard
• Re: Linear recurrence on elliptic curve
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Linear recurrence on elliptic curve
  • From: tra123
• Re: What is a good Windows XP file to store encrypted volumes
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: Converting scales of True Random Numbers causes distribution de-uniformization
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Converting scales of True Random Numbers causes distribution de-uniformization
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Converting scales of True Random Numbers causes distribution de-uniformization
  • From: rossum
• Re: Encryption/decryption modes for file systems
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Converting scales of True Random Numbers causes distribution de-uniformization
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: David Eather
• Encryption/decryption modes for file systems
  • From: Harold Weissman
• Re: newbie need help (ECC and wireless)
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Converting scales of True Random Numbers causes distribution de-uniformization
  • From: sugoi . sama
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: M Jason Hinek
• Re: security engineer skills set for software engineering background
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: security engineer skills set for software engineering background
  • From: Alan
• Re: security engineer skills set for software engineering background
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Random oracles
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: David Eather
• Re: security engineer skills set for software engineering background
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: security engineer skills set for software engineering background
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Authentication in levels
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Random oracles
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Random oracles
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: Authentication in levels
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Random oracles
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Authentication in levels
  • From: Jakob
• Random oracles
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• 3DES-CBC padding mode
  • From: mike
• security engineer skills set for software engineering background
  • From: Ken
• PCI and PCI-X cards for RSA
  • From: jandersonlee
• Re: newbie need help (ECC and wireless)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• How to make a taxonomy of bilinear pairing
  • From: Samson
• How to make a taxonomy of bilinear pairing
  • From: Samson
• Re: newbie need help (ECC and wireless)
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: newbie need help (ECC and wireless)
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Announce: uvlan 0.03
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Announce: uvlan 0.03
  • From: tomstdenis
• Announce: uvlan 0.03
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: newbie need help (ECC and wireless)
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: laura fairhead
• Re: Linear feedback shift register based cryptosystem
  • From: Dmitry Khovratovich
• Re: newbie need help (ECC and wireless)
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: How many
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: newbie need help (ECC and wireless)
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: How many
  • From: user923005
• Re: The Venona Project
  • From: Harry Thompson
• Re: newbie need help (ECC and wireless)
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: newbie need help (ECC and wireless)
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: newbie need help (ECC and wireless)
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: covering radius (was "maximum distance") of a Goppa code?
  • From: finiasz
• Re: group signature
  • From: blueEyed7
• Re: group signature
  • From: blueEyed7
• Re: How many
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: How many
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: Linear feedback shift register based cryptosystem
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: How many
  • From: Civitas Fenniae
• Re: newbie need help (ECC and wireless)
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Linear feedback shift register based cryptosystem
  • From: Bob A
• Re: Insecure cryptographic algorithms to avoid using?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Insecure cryptographic algorithms to avoid using?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Insecure cryptographic algorithms to avoid using?
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Insecure cryptographic algorithms to avoid using?
  • From: David Wagner
• How many
  • From: YardSale GarageSale HouseSale BodySale
• Insecure cryptographic algorithms to avoid using?
  • From: ykgoh
• Re: security engineering versus information security
  • From: clark
• Linear feedback shift register based cryptosystem
  • From: Dennis Yurichev
• Re: security engineering versus information security
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• newbie need help (ECC and wireless)
  • From: Ray
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: mm
• Re: Enigma-like cipher: variable rotor stepping
  • From: joes
• Re: security engineering versus information security
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: clark
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: Unruh
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: clark
• Re: security engineering versus information security
  • From: clark
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: security engineering versus information security
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: security engineering versus information security
  • From: pegguru
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Steganography Novice with Question about detecting jpg steg
  • From: alToS
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: rossum
• Re: The Venona Project
  • From: K. Jennings
• Re: Steganography Novice with Question about detecting jpg steg
  • From: secretcodebreaker
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Timoleon
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Steganography Novice with Question about detecting jpg steg
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: The Venona Project
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• The Venona Project
  • From: K. Jennings
• Re: security engineering versus information security
  • From: Paul Rubin
• security engineering versus information security
  • From: John
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: rossum
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: rossum
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: covering radius (was "maximum distance") of a Goppa code?
  • From: usenet
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: laura fairhead
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Steganography Novice with Question about detecting jpg steg
  • From: steggy
• Steganography Novice with Question about detecting jpg steg
  • From: steggy
• Steganography Novice with Question about detecting jpg steg
  • From: steggy
• Re: Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Post-doc position
  • From: Ercan Solak
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Intel core 2 quad - faster XMM?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: Unruh
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: Unruh
• Cryptanalytic results on FORK-256 compression function - website
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: rossum
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: Vincent Badier
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: rossum
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: rossum
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: clark
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: David Taylor
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: jiangwu.mail@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: Amit
• Re: Hardware Security Module (HSM) Information
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: rossum
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• Re: Do Gap-CDH groups exist?
  • From: jiangwu.mail@xxxxxxxxx
• Hardware Security Module (HSM) Information
  • From: karl@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: rossum
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: A PRNG based on the DLP
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: A PRNG based on the DLP
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: ECC point at infinity
  • From: Bill
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: Unruh
• Re: A PRNG based on the DLP
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: rossum
• Re: ECC point at infinity
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: rossum
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: David Taylor
• Re: ECC point at infinity
  • From: Bill
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: clark
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: rossum
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: rossum
• Re: ECC point at infinity
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: ECC point at infinity
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: A PRNG based on the DLP
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: ECC point at infinity
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: A PRNG based on the DLP
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: ECC point at infinity
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Lucas pseudoprime test
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: ECC point at infinity
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• ECC point at infinity
  • From: Bill
• Re: We have the best backdoors?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: We have the best backdoors?
  • From: b
• Call for Participation - IACR TCC 2007
  • From: Eike Kiltz
• Leon2-CIS: Embedded processor with cryptography extensions
  • From: Stefan Tillich
• Re: Lucas pseudoprime test
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: clark
• Re: Lucas pseudoprime test
  • From: Francois Grieu
• We have the best backdoors?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: black-box with unknown algorithm + brute-force
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Lucas pseudoprime test
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: how can we born prime !
  • From: rossum
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: earlcolby . pottinger
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: David Taylor
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: rossum
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: David Taylor
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: David Taylor
• Re: ECC standards?
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: how can we born prime !
  • From: tomstdenis
• how can we born prime !
  • From: athur-luobo
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: A PRNG based on the DLP
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: A PRNG based on the DLP
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: VPE
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: clark
• wanted -- bestcrypt sha-512
  • From: a
• Re: ECC standards?
  • From: Bill
• Re: relationship between divisor and dividend in CRC codes
  • From: AnetaKvel
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: Bill Unruh
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: rossum
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: rossum
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: rossum
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: Unruh
• Re: ECC standards?
  • From: tomstdenis
• ECC standards?
  • From: Bill
• ECC standards?
  • From: Bill
• Re: relationship between divisor and dividend in CRC codes
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: rossum
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: About RSA implementation
  • From: tomstdenis
• About RSA implementation
  • From: cold80
• Re: relationship between divisor and dividend in CRC codes
  • From: rossum
• ARC4 as a hash function
  • From: rossum
• Re: relationship between divisor and dividend in CRC codes
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: VPE
• Re: relationship between divisor and dividend in CRC codes
  • From: tomstdenis
• relationship between divisor and dividend in CRC codes
  • From: AnetaKvel
• Re: A PRNG based on the DLP
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: mehreen
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: A PRNG based on the DLP
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: black-box with unknown algorithm + brute-force
  • From: Unruh
• Re: OT: Mystery partially solved (was Microsoft does it again?!)
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: OT: Mystery partially solved (was Microsoft does it again?!)
  • From: Nelson B
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: A PRNG based on the DLP
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Information Representation in Brain - Superposition & Cryptography
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Signature Schem with Recovery (and Size)
  • From: François Grieu
• Re: black-box with unknown algorithm + brute-force
  • From: hypermodest
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Harry Thompson
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: rossum
• Re: Signature Schem with Recovery (and Size)
  • From: Eike Kiltz
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Password "scoring"
  • From: karaltan
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: rossum
• Signature Schem with Recovery (and Size)
  • From: Jeffrey Walton
• Re: Quartz
  • From: Jeffrey Walton
• Re: A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: black-box with unknown algorithm + brute-force
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• A twist on OTP for an outstandingly secure channel?
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Devon Smythe
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: mm
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: mm
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: mm
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Phil Carmody
• A PRNG based on the DLP
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: mm
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Need a bit help with decyphering a message
  • From: mike3
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: black-box with unknown algorithm + brute-force
  • From: tenteric
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: black-box with unknown algorithm + brute-force
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: black-box with unknown algorithm + brute-force
  • From: tenteric
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Unruh
• Re: black-box with unknown algorithm + brute-force
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• black-box with unknown algorithm + brute-force
  • From: tenteric
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Unruh
• Re: *** Miss Universe Terrorist 2007 ****
  • From: Ignacio aecbi
• Need a bit help with decyphering a message
  • From: attila
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: rossum
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Information Representation in Brain - Superposition & Cryptography
  • From: Neil W Rickert
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: mm
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Information Representation in Brain - Superposition & Cryptography
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Hans
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: David Eather
• Bruce Schneier - errors in table of primitive polynomials mod 2
  • From: Hans
• Re: Quartz
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Quartz
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Harry Thompson
• Re: Quartz
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Quartz
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Information Representation in Brain - Superposition & Cryptography
  • From: PeskyBee
• Re: Quartz
  • From: Jeffrey Walton
• Re: Key update
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: David Eather
• Re: question on pairing
  • From: Eike Kiltz
• Re: Key update
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Key update
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: question on pairing
  • From: Thomas ***in
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Unruh
• question on pairing
  • From: bobic
• Re: Prime tests complexity
  • From: mm
• Quartz
  • From: Jeffrey Walton
• Re: Information Representation in Brain - Superposition & Cryptography
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: laura fairhead
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Prime tests complexity
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Prime tests complexity
  • From: Christian Siebert
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: rossum
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: rossum
• Re: Thank you all for the constructive comments
  • From: rossum
• Re: Prime tests complexity
  • From: Vincent Badier
• Re: Prime tests complexity
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Key update
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Thank you all for the constructive comments
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Password "scoring"
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Thank you all for the constructive comments
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: Password "scoring"
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: David Eather
• Prime tests complexity
  • From: Vincent Badier
• Thank you all for the constructive comments
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Key update
  • From: Jakob
• Re: Variance of the Index of Coincidence
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: Disk encryption software for Win98 and Win2000/XP
  • From: zegroy
• Re: Variance of the Index of Coincidence
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Ignacio aecbi
• Variance of the Index of Coincidence
  • From: r.e.s.
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Was the Abwehr Enigma-G stronger than the normal Enigma, dueto the rotating reflector?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: rossum
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: rossum
• Re: Number theoretic functions
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Was the Abwehr Enigma-G stronger than the normal Enigma, due to the rotating reflector?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: vedaal
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: Valery Pryamikov
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: rossum
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: rossum
• Re: Password "scoring"
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Password "scoring"
  • From: grk
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Bodhi
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Key update
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: laura fairhead
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: ink
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: ink
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: rossum
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: laura fairhead
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Was the Abwehr Enigma-G stronger than the normal Enigma, due to the rotating reflector?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: David Eather
• Re: OT: Mystery partially solved (was Microsoft does it again?!)
  • From: seanfi
• Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Password "scoring"
  • From: rossum
• Key update
  • From: Jakob
• Password "scoring"
  • From: grk
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: Valery Pryamikov
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: Valery Pryamikov
• Re: Was the Abwehr Enigma-G stronger than the normal Enigma, due to the rotating reflector?
  • From: David Hamer
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: rossum
• Re: The operational FreeMove Quantum Exchange Proof-of-Concept
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: RSA Performance
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Key-based cryptographic modes
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: and now for something completely different.
  • From: Antony Clements
• Toorcon Stipend Project
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: Antony Clements
• Encryption key longer than text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Key longer then the text to encrypt
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Enigma-like cipher: variable rotor stepping
  • From: David Eather
• Re: 'So called' Bible Code? Yes, at last it's found
  • From: David Eather
• Re: 'So called' Bible Code? Yes, at last it's found
  • From: rossum
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Testing XTEA
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Enigma-like cipher: variable rotor stepping
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Enigma-like cipher: variable rotor stepping
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• 'So called' Bible Code? Yes, at last it's found
  • From: Boris
• Re: Disk encryption software for Win98 and Win2000/XP
  • From: Alan
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Re: Testing XTEA
  • From: Mike Simpson
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Testing XTEA
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Enigma-like cipher: variable rotor stepping
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: David Eather
• Re: I'm back, news, good will and all that
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: I'm back, news, good will and all that
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: David Eather
• Re: I'm back, news, good will and all that
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: I'm back, news, good will and all that
  • From: ink
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: and now for something completely different.
  • From: Bryan Olson
• Re: Enigma-like cipher: variable rotor stepping
  • From: Ben Pfaff
• Re: Enigma-like cipher: variable rotor stepping
  • From: Dennis Ritchie
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: tomstdenis
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: sharma
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: tomstdenis
• and now for something complete different part 2
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Enigma-like cipher: variable rotor stepping
  • From: DarkProtoman
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Enigma-like cipher: variable rotor stepping
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Unruh
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: earlcolby . pottinger
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: earlcolby . pottinger
• Re: OT: Mystery partially solved (was Microsoft does it again?!)
  • From: earlcolby . pottinger
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Louis Scheffer
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Testing XTEA
  • From: Mike Simpson
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: clark
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: David Eather
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: Andrew Swallow
• Re: and now for something completely different.
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Jeff Dege
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: Grouchy
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• Re: OT: Mystery partially solved (was Microsoft does it again?!)
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Paul Rubin
• OT: Mystery partially solved (was Microsoft does it again?!)
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: David Eather
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Enigma-like cipher: variable rotor stepping
  • From: DarkProtoman
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Enigma-like cipher: variable rotor stepping
  • From: DarkProtoman
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: David Eather
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Enigma-like cipher: variable rotor stepping
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Encryption - How to Choose Password
  • From: rossum
• Re: Enigma-like cipher: variable rotor stepping
  • From: Jean-François Michaud
• Re: Testing XTEA
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
  • From: DarkProtoman
• Re: I'm back, news, good will and all that
  • From: laura fairhead
• Re: and now for something completely different.
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: OT: Microsoft does it again?!
  • From: Andrew Swallow

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• News
• Mailing-Lists
• Newsgroups
• Service
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

www.derkeiler.com  > Newsgroups  > sci.crypt  > 2007-01