Re: The operational FreeMove Quantum Exchange Proof-of-Concept
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen <kristiag+news@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:34:31 +0000 (UTC)
Mpilot <mobilepilot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kristian Gjøsteen wrote:
However, you stated (in a discussion on sci.crypt.random-numbers)
that you could use the internet as your communications channel. The
scheme described in the thesis you refer to does not work with noiseless
channels (as far as I could determine). The conclusion is that you are
talking nonsense.
I have read what you post.
Too bad you don't answer.
[...]
If you look at Fig. 4.3. in which the Gaussian Wiretap Channel with
Side Information is given, you think Y is used as a channel. However
this is wrong: Z is used as a channel !
Are we looking at the same document and the same figure? Fig. 4.3 on page
46 in the deposit.ddb.de document you referred to previously? In that
case, Y is what the recipient gets (a noisy version of what was sent),
Z is what the wiretapper gets (a noisy version of Y). Further, using Y
or Z "as a channel" doesn't immediately make sense to me, since they are
(as far as I understand) random variables.
--
Kristian Gjøsteen
.
- References:
- The operational FreeMove Quantum Exchange Proof-of-Concept
- From: Mpilot
- Re: The operational FreeMove Quantum Exchange Proof-of-Concept
- From: Mpilot
- Re: The operational FreeMove Quantum Exchange Proof-of-Concept
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: The operational FreeMove Quantum Exchange Proof-of-Concept
- From: Mpilot
- The operational FreeMove Quantum Exchange Proof-of-Concept
- Prev by Date: Re: Enigma machine strenght using a computer
- Next by Date: Re: The operational FreeMove Quantum Exchange Proof-of-Concept
- Previous by thread: Re: The operational FreeMove Quantum Exchange Proof-of-Concept
- Next by thread: Re: The operational FreeMove Quantum Exchange Proof-of-Concept
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|