Re: The operational FreeMove Quantum Exchange Proof-of-Concept

Mpilot <mobilepilot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kristian Gjøsteen wrote:
I repeat, my best estimate is that your scheme is nonsense and you are a crank of some kind. Feel free to be offended.

The scheme's are implemented using software building blocks given in
the reference http://itpp.sourceforge.net/ The scheme which is based on
Information Hiding is described in
http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=969668201&dok_var=d1&dok_ext=pdf&filename=969668201.pdf

If you believe one of these references contains errors, so this scheme
is nonsense, you are free to write.

This is getting tedious. You should read what I write and respond to
that. Nobody claims that there are errors in the published papers you
refer to, so nobody's obliged to point out errors in them.

However, you stated (in a discussion on sci.crypt.random-numbers)
that you could use the internet as your communications channel. The
scheme described in the thesis you refer to does not work with noiseless
channels (as far as I could determine). The conclusion is that you are
talking nonsense.

--
Kristian Gjøsteen
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How to update an agrument passed by name in scheme
    ... what would you call the thing in Scheme with an external representation of the form (x. ... I was not trying to give an introductory treatment. ... that any use of the two words "by" and "reference" consecutively in the same sentence trigger a rewrite rule in your brain. ... confusion -- precisely the kind of confusion that we are seeing here. ...
    (comp.lang.scheme)
  • Re: The operational FreeMove Quantum Exchange Proof-of-Concept
    ... refer to, so nobody's obliged to point out errors in them. ... If you believe one of these references contains errors, so this scheme ... Nobody claims that there are errors in the published papers you ... that you could use the internet as your communications channel. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: How to update an agrument passed by name in scheme
    ... people say "say how much easier it is to do this thing in Scheme as opposed to whatever other language". ... But passing by reference is exceptionally easy in some of those other languages, and not so easy in Scheme, which, based on this thread, cannot be done trivially. ... that foo is an ordinary procedure, then without even knowing what foo does, we can safely conclude that the result of the expression is 5. ...
    (comp.lang.scheme)
  • Re: arrays = pointers?
    ... If it turns out that the memory scheme used by .NET is less efficient than other possible schemes, well...let's just say that wouldn't be the first time some major blunder was made when creating some computer architecture. ... If something is referenced only once or twice, then it doesn't matter how long it takes to resolve that reference. ... And it would require the compiler to do more work. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: How to update an agrument passed by name in scheme
    ... Scheme, which, based on this thread, cannot be done trivially. ... passed by reference in Scheme. ... What the OP meant by "passed by name" can also be described as "passing a variable by reference". ... In Algol 60, the problem was that the language had side effects, which don't mix well with call by name. ...
    (comp.lang.scheme)