Re: group signature
- From: enzymatic.bubble@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 6 Dec 2006 10:23:18 -0800
vedaal wrote:
[...]
pgp has implemented this by using Blakely-Shamir key splitting to
'split'
a 'group' key into shares, and encrypting each shared key fragment to
the pre-existing public key of the individual group member
This doesn't sound like a true group signature. For one, the first time
a subset of the group colludes to sign a message, they get the true
group key and therefore never need to collude again to sign other
messages. I'm sure this has been noticed before though...
--Aaron
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: group signature
- From: vedaal
- Re: group signature
- References:
- group signature
- From: guss
- Re: group signature
- From: vedaal
- group signature
- Prev by Date: Re: what is probability to create two equal hashes for md5 algorithm
- Next by Date: Re: what is probability to create two equal hashes for md5 algorithm
- Previous by thread: Re: group signature
- Next by thread: Re: group signature
- Index(es):