Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: "Tom St Denis" <tomstdenis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Nov 2006 05:39:54 -0800
clark wrote:
No. You're wrong.
No. *You're* wrong.
The issue is that Jan posted some interesting information. Period.
According to David Wagner, it's not interesting :-)
And so what? Doesn't mean he can go about not reading the group and
then post whatever he wants.
JUST BECAUSE YOU DISCUSSED IT OR THOUGHT ABOUT IT OR WROTE A BOOK
ABOUT IT OR CODED IT OR DISAGREED WITH IT PREVIOUSLY DOESN'T MATTER!!!
No, but that there was a thread about the subject that started a few
days before his should matter.
It doesn't preclude others from discussing it.
If you wanted to discuss the attack, reply in the original thread on
the matter.
GOT IT? ANY PERSON ANYWHERE FOR ANY REASON CAN BRING UP COOL
INFORMATION IN THE GROUP. SO SHUT TF UP.
Sure, just don't repeat yourself.
Sure, just don't repeat yourself.
Sure, just don't repeat yourself.
Sure, ... wait a minute...
Get that through your fat head. Stop being such a coward and let
others have a discussion without your annoying, worthless spew.
That's the point, they *did* have a conversation about it. In the
*other* thread on the matter.
My problem isn't that he posted the article, or that I disagree with
paper. It's that Jan doesn't read sci.crypt and then proceeds to post
to the group.
Newsflash, that's consider rude behaviour.
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: Unruh
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: Unruh
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: panteltje
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: Unruh
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: clark
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: clark
- Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- Prev by Date: Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- Next by Date: Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- Previous by thread: Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|