Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: "Tom St Denis" <tomstdenis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Nov 2006 06:42:30 -0800
clark wrote:
How am I a coward? That's something zzz or mm [or one of their
personas] started but I don't really recall how or why I became a
coward.
When one behaves in a cowardly fashion they are referred to as a
coward. That's why.
That's some mighty fine circuitous logic there lou.
I may be an idiot, socially dysfunctional, lazy, and tactless, but I
don't see myself as a coward.
What you consider to be strength is not strong at all. It is overt,
to be sure, but there is no strength or honor or goodwill, whatsoever.
OMG, you're right!!! What have I been doing with my life!!!
Instead of allowing others the courtesy of simple discussion, you
interject in cowardly fashion.
By using my real name and email address, allowing trolls like you, zzz,
and mm to subject me to limited forms of contempt? That's cowardly?
I'd always think of using a pseudonym as cowardly...
Hiding behind false and selfish motives is cowardly.
My motives are not false or selfish. I may be an emotionally needy
person, but I don't work on the LT stuff solely to make myself feel
better about myself. That you're a useless tool is no surprise, but
believe it or not some people in this actually do work (for fun, free,
charity, work, profit) and some of those use my stuff.
As for telling Jan not to repost papers, well that's just common sense.
Of which you lack a plenty.
If you were actually strong, or had anything resembling strong
convictions, you could merely disregard posts that you had no
meaningful input for.
I choose the battles I think are worthy. Note how I don't reply in
every thread, even when I disagree with the topic or people posting.
And would ya actually reply to what I'm writing instead of writing
"<snip self-serving BS>" that's childish since it basically amounts to
"<I'm a troll, not even reading the replies, I just wanna spout ***
about someone, look at me, I'm a loser attention whore>".
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: Unruh
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: panteltje
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: Unruh
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: clark
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: clark
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: clark
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- From: clark
- Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- Prev by Date: Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- Next by Date: Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- Previous by thread: Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- Index(es):