Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
- From: "Tom St Denis" <tomstdenis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Nov 2006 05:19:30 -0800
Kristian Gjøsteen wrote:
That calculation is obviously irrelevant, since MD5 doesn't have an
upper limit to its input length.
While RFC 1321 does permit longer messages it's clear that it's not a
good idea as you could have two messages of different length with equal
length encodings.
.... forget the fact the message would be 2^61 bytes long...
:-)
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
- From: Unruh
- Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
- References:
- Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
- From: gen_vlsi
- Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
- Prev by Date: Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
- Next by Date: Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers
- Previous by thread: Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
- Next by thread: Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
- Index(es):