Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:57:48 -0700
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006v.html#1 New attacks on the financial PIN processing
part of the issue was that the x9a10 financial standards working group
in the mid-90s was given the requirement to preserve the integrity of
the financial infrastructure for all retail transactions (that met all
kinds of environments, internet, point-of-sale, face-to-face,
non-face-to-face, etc ... as well as all kinds of retail transactions,
credit, debit, ach, etc).
part of the activity was looking at existing standards, industry
specification, association specification ... other protocol related
work going on in the same time ... and investigate the various
associated threats and vulnerabilities ... and what any
countermeasures were being targeted at.
the result was the x9.59 financial standard for all retail payments
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/x959.html#x959
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subpubkey.html#x959
one of the wide-spread threats/vulnerabilities at the time was
skimming/harvesting of static data that could be used in various kinds
of replay attacks for fraudulent transactions. a major feature of
x9.59 was the elimination of static data.
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subintegrity.html#harvest
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subintegrity.html#secrets
another was the extreme ambiquity/confusion regarding the account
number in various kinds of transactions. in some kinds of
transactions, skimming/harvesting the account number was sufficient
(static) information for an attacker to perform a fraudulent
transaction. this led to requirements for the account number to be
kept confidential and never be divulged. at the same time, the account
number was the critical piece of information needed in performing a
large number of different business processes ... requiring it to be
readily available. the conflicting requirements led to my comments
about even if the planet was buried under miles of encryption, it
still wouldn't be sufficient to prevent account number leakage.
so another part of the x9.59 was to make it so that the account number
was no longer sufficient for letting an attacker perform a fraudulent
transaction (it didn't do anything about preventing account number
leakage, it just eliminated the risk related to any account number
leakage).
this is slightly related to my past comment about security proportional
to risk
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001h.html#61
and a recent news item concerning insider threats
Banks face growing threat of identity theft from insiders
<a href="http://news.com.com/Banks+face+growing+threat+of+identity+theft+from+insiders/2100-1029_3-6137940.html">http://news.com.com/Banks+face+growing+threat+of+identity+theft+from+insiders/2100-1029_3-6137940.html</a>
from above:
<cite>
Banks are pouring money into building formidable defenses against
computer hackers, but are only just waking up to what may be a bigger
threat--the physical theft of client information by people in the
office.
</cite>
..... snip ...
also mentioned here
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm26.htm#7
it isn't exactly new news ... insiders have always been considered the
major threat ... whether it is physical theft or various kinds of
electronic data breaches and/or security breaches.
misc. past items ...
Study: ID theft usually an inside job
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm17.htm#38
Leading Cause of Data Security breaches Are Due to Insiders
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm18.htm#49
Bank workers biggest ID theft threat
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2005l.html#35
other insider threat
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006p.html#9
.
- References:
- New attacks on the financial PIN processing
- From: JR
- Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
- From: uri
- Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
- From: Joseph Ashwood
- Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
- From: uri
- Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
- From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
- New attacks on the financial PIN processing
- Prev by Date: Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
- Next by Date: Question from an intelligent (?) layman
- Previous by thread: Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
- Next by thread: Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|