Re: Chaum's punchscan
- From: Mike Amling <spamonly@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Nov 2006 12:43:01 EST
xmath wrote:
David Wagner wrote:I don't see it. You have approximately a 0% chance of collecting if you
just ignore the instructions and vote any way you like.
Indeed, you should always vote as the buyer says, just make sure to
maximize the chance it'll be your preferred choices and minimize the
chance it'll be what the buyer wants. He'll never find out.
Also I pointed out earlier that pattern voting attacks don't work,
since punchscan can decrypt and tally every race independently.
Not pattern voting of the chosen candidates. A pattern in the receipt's left-right marks.
--Mike Amling
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Chaum's punchscan
- From: xmath
- Re: Chaum's punchscan
- References:
- Chaum's punchscan
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Chaum's punchscan
- From: xmath
- Re: Chaum's punchscan
- From: David Wagner
- Re: Chaum's punchscan
- From: Mike Amling
- Re: Chaum's punchscan
- From: David Wagner
- Re: Chaum's punchscan
- From: xmath
- Chaum's punchscan
- Prev by Date: Re: Chaum's punchscan
- Next by Date: Re: Chaum's punchscan
- Previous by thread: Re: Chaum's punchscan
- Next by thread: Re: Chaum's punchscan
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|