sci.crypt

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: Mel
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: Timoleon
• Re: performance of next generation hash functions
  • From: Tom St Denis
• performance of next generation hash functions
  • From: jd51a
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: clark
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: clark
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: noload
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: clark
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: clark
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: can you decrypt?
  • From: Mike McNally
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: clark
• can you decrypt?
  • From: need . help . please
• Re: OT. Before it gets to Christmas time... My melancholic look back at the last year
  • From: vedaal
• can you decrypt?
  • From: need . help . please
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: rossum
• ThreeBallot receipt ZK? ZI?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: questions about ASN.1
  • From: Jeff Jacoby
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: noload
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: noload
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: noload
• Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers
  • From: darklogic
• Re: OT. Before it gets to Christmas time... My melancholic look back at the last year
  • From: david . florman
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers
  • From: secretcodebreaker
• Re: questions about ASN.1
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Poly1305 vs. UMAC vs. new MAC1071
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: questions about ASN.1
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers
  • From: Mike McNally
• Re: OT question re The Bells
  • From: Dante Alighieri
• Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers
  • From: secretcodebreaker
• Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: Felix Rawlings
• Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers
  • From: Mike McNally
• Re: DES: left "circular shift" of key bits
  • From: Mike McNally
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: Tom St Denis
• sorry guys
  • From: mantinin
• Re: questions about ASN.1
  • From: lionet1
• Re: DES: left "circular shift" of key bits
  • From: Mike McNally
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: REMOVE . spam
• Re: DES: left "circular shift" of key bits
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: Unruh
• DES: left "circular shift" of key bits
  • From: Mike McNally
• Re: questions about ASN.1
  • From: Jeff Jacoby
• Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: Felix Rawlings
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: zzz
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: zzz
• OT. Before it gets to Christmas time... My melancholic look back at the last year
  • From: David Eather
• OT. Before it gets to Christmas time... My melancholic look back at the last year
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: panteltje
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: Unruh
• Re: questions about ASN.1
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: Tom St Denis
• questions about ASN.1
  • From: yawnmoth
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: mm
• Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers
  • From: darklogic
• Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers
  • From: darklogic
• Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: duoduolei
• Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Comaprison between MD5 and SHA
  • From: gen_vlsi
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Question from an intelligent (?) layman
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: mike3
• Re: Question from an intelligent (?) layman
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Question from an intelligent (?) layman
  • From: Tim Peters
• Re: Question from an intelligent (?) layman
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Question from an intelligent (?) layman
  • From: Al
• Question from an intelligent (?) layman
  • From: Al
• Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: TomFoolery
• Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: Poly1305 vs. UMAC vs. new MAC1071
  • From: xmath
• Re: CBC mac with LibTomCrypt
  • From: Tom St Denis
• CBC mac with LibTomCrypt
  • From: Ulf Reiman
• Re: Algebraic cryptanalysis of DES
  • From: noload
• Re: Algebraic cryptanalysis of DES
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Zarathustra
• Re: Algebraic cryptanalysis of DES
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: Woody Brison
• Re: finding inverse of a polynomial mod a primitive polynomial
  • From: mehreen
• Re: Got something to decrypt
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Got something to decrypt
  • From: martyK
• Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers
  • From: Mike McNally
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Jose Sanchez
• Re: Algebraic cryptanalysis of DES
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Algebraic cryptanalysis of DES
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Algebraic cryptanalysis of DES
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Algebraic cryptanalysis of DES
  • From: zabriskier
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Zarathustra
• Re: L15 prize increased to £100
  • From: clark
• Re: CCM and EAX test vectors
  • From: BRG
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: finding inverse of a polynomial mod a primitive polynomial
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Help required - Cryptography career
  • From: noel . catterall
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Zarathustra
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Zarathustra
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Zarathustra
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Markus.Dichtl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Zarathustra
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Bodo Moeller
• Re: Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Secure hash function and AES
  • From: Zarathustra
• Re: Leopard15/L15
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Help required - Cryptography career
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Poly1305 vs. UMAC vs. new MAC1071
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: giorgio.tani
• L15 prize increased to £100
  • From: Robin Carey
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: David Eather
• Re: I leave you for now
  • From: Caleb
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: giorgio . tani
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: giorgio . tani
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Markus.Dichtl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: I leave you for now
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Leopard15/L15
  • From: David Eather
• I leave you for now
  • From: Stratocaster
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Stratocaster
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Alan
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Alan
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Carlos Moreno
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Amazing !!!
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Amazing !!!
  • From: Salami Man
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: fermineutron
• Re: Leopard15/L15
  • From: clark
• Re: Leopard15/L15
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Leopard15/L15
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Leopard15/L15
  • From: clark
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Markus.Dichtl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Markus.Dichtl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Amazing !!!
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Amazing !!!
  • From: youtube300
• Re: Help required - Cryptography career
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Markus.Dichtl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Bodo Moeller
• Re: Help required - Cryptography career
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: giorgio.tani
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Stratocaster
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: antispam
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Stratocaster
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Stratocaster
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Stratocaster
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Stratocaster
• OT question re The Bells
  • From: Dante Alighieri
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Scott Contini
• Re: Crypto export laws - anyone familiar?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Crypto export laws - anyone familiar?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: New RSA attack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• New RSA attack
  • From: James S. Singleton
• Re: Crypto export laws - anyone familiar?
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Crypto export laws - anyone familiar?
  • From: Unruh
• Crypto export laws - anyone familiar?
  • From: Amish
• AC 2007 - (2nd call): 18 December 2006
  • From: natty2006@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Leopard15/L15
  • From: clark
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Language as a cipher?
  • From: kalimaa
• Re: Leopard15/L15
  • From: kalimaa
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: extracting the exponent / modulus from a *.pem file?
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Markus.Dichtl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Markus.Dichtl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Blowfish andDiffie Hellman
  • From: clark
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: CCM and EAX test vectors
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: new question
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: new question
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers
  • From: Christian Zietz
• CCM and EAX test vectors
  • From: arman
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: nobody
• Re: LibTomCrypt v1.15 released
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: mm
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: TC
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Blowfish andDiffie Hellman
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: Mike Amling
• Blowfish andDiffie Hellman
  • From: fahnaim
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: ~ * A Morning Wood Too Close Too Home
  • From: noload
• Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers
  • From: Mike McNally
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Leopard15/L15
  • From: Robin Carey
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: PeteJ
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: fermineutron
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: jsavard
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: TC
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: TC
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: Glenn P.,
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: LibTomCrypt v1.15 released
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: TC
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: TC
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: fermineutron
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: fermineutron
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: fermineutron
• Re: Decentralized article review [was:... review procedures]
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: fermineutron
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: JiXian Yang
• Strongest encryption algorithm
  • From: fermineutron
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Decentralized article review [was:... review procedures]
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: zzz
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: zzz
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: extracting the exponent / modulus from a *.pem file?
  • From: Peter Trei
• LibTomCrypt v1.15 released
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis
  • From: billcoder
• Re: extracting the exponent / modulus from a *.pem file?
  • From: Peter S. May
• extracting the exponent / modulus from a *.pem file?
  • From: yawnmoth
• LibTomCrypt v1.15 released
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: TC
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: mm
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition)
  • From: mm
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: HEX calculators capable of +,-,XOR,AND ... with bitfields up to "Whirlpool" size (MD5 size is OK)?
  • From: Doug Stell
• Decentralized article review [was:... review procedures]
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition)
  • From: mm
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: TC
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: riedel
• Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition)
  • From: Jeffrey Walton
• Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition)
  • From: Jeffrey Walton
• Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition)
  • From: Jeffrey Walton
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: mm
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: TC
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: TC
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: TC
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: David Eather
• LibTomCrypt v1.15 released
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: David Eather
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: mm
• Re: Better - lossless 5.3 bits storage per move
  • From: David Eather
• Real numbers of entropy bits
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: ink
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: mm
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: laura fairhead
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: mm
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: David Eather
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: mm
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: TC
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Bodo Moeller
• Re: To Tom St Denis
  • From: mm
• Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: David Eather
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Peter Gutmann
• Re: finding inverse of a polynomial mod a primitive polynomial
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: finding inverse of a polynomial mod a primitive polynomial
  • From: hoz
• Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition)
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition)
  • From: Johannes Kloos
• finding inverse of a polynomial mod a primitive polynomial
  • From: mehreen
• To Tom St Denis
  • From: Marcolippo
• Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences
  • From: Markus.Dichtl
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: TC
• Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition)
  • From: Jeffrey Walton
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: David Eather
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: David Eather
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Charles Redmon
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Charles Redmon
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: tedu
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: zzz
• Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: tedu
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Charles Redmon
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Charles Redmon
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Frank W. Steiner
• Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: zzz
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: zzz
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: zzz
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Charles Redmon
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: zzz
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: zzz
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Tom St Denis
• 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess
  • From: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Charles Redmon
• Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?
  • From: BRG
• Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?
  • From: Guy Fawkes
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: David Eather
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?
  • From: Guy Fawkes
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: mm
• Re: 6 round DES attack
  • From: Alan
• Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: 6 round DES attack
  • From: Ralf-Philipp Weinmann
• Re: new question
  • From: TC
• Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?
  • From: BRG
• Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?
  • From: Christophe Devine
• Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
  • From: uri
• Re: new question
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?
  • From: Chris McDonald
• Re: new question
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: new question
  • From: Antony Clements
• Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?
  • From: Guy Fawkes
• Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
  • From: uri
• Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Help required - Cryptography career
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: new question
  • From: rossum
• Re: 6 round DES attack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: 6 round DES attack
  • From: Alan
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: voyagor
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: mm
• Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks
  • From: davvid_a_scott
• Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Help required - Cryptography career
  • From: Chokks
• Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing
  • From: uri
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Ivan Voras
• New attacks on the financial PIN processing
  • From: JR
• Re: new question
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Fighting stupidity
  • From: Thomas ***in
• Re: Fighting stupidity
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Fighting stupidity
  • From: Thomas ***in
• Re: new question
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: mm
• Re: new question
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Fighting stupidity
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis
  • From: Ray Ingles
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis
  • From: Ray Ingles
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: new question
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: new question
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Fighting stupidity
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Simon Johnson
• LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: J. Craptology
  • From: vedaal
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: mm
• Re: Fighting stupidity
  • From: Antti Louko
• Re: Fighting stupidity
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Fighting stupidity
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: HMAC question
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Fighting stupidity
  • From: Thomas ***in
• Re: Fighting stupidity
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Fighting stupidity
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Fighting stupidity
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Fighting stupidity
  • From: Antti Louko
• Re: Fighting stupidity
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Fighting stupidity
  • From: Antti Louko
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• 6 round DES attack
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: new question
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: J. Craptology
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: new question
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: HMAC question
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: new question
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: new question
  • From: Antony Clements
• J. Craptology
  • From: Nigel Smart
• Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis
  • From: TC
• Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis
  • From: TC
• LibTomMath overflow bug
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: new question
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: new question
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: new question
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis
  • From: sorceror171
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: aeessex
• Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis
  • From: TC
• Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis
  • From: sorceror171
• Re: new question
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: new question
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis
  • From: TC
• Re: new question
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: new question
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis
  • From: TC
• new question
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Generate Key-Disk
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis
  • From: Phil Carmody
• General hints for newbie cryptanalysis
  • From: Ray Ingles
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks
  • From: fermineutron
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Bruce Stephens
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Codex - Channel 4
  • From: ben . stiff
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Codex - Channel 4
  • From: ben . stiff
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Generate Key-Disk
  • From: djorgepbl
• Re: Generate Key-Disk
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: Generate Key-Disk
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Generate Key-Disk
  • From: djorgepbl
• IPsec/IKE Practical Protocol Question
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: TC
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Nospam12
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: TC
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: David Eather
• Hex to Float conversion of GPS Latitude
  • From: volosov
• A Deadly Message Regarding ANNA KUBIT
  • From: WARNING!
• Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Generate Key-Disk
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks
  • From: fermineutron
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Important Information
  • From: zzz
• Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses]
  • From: zzz
• Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses]
  • From: zzz
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Juuso Hukkanen
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Nospam12
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Marlinde
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: toader@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Generate Key-Disk
  • From: djorgepbl
• Re: Elliptic Curve Parameter Selection
  • From: mm
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Glenn P.,
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: giorgio.tani
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Nospam12
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Elliptic Curve Parameter Selection
  • From: amzoti
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: TC
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: giorgio.tani
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: TC
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: TC
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: rossum
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Marlinde
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Marlinde
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses]
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses]
  • From: David Eather
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: rossum
• Re: Generate Key-Disk
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: antispam
• Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses]
  • From: antispam
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses]
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Need CRC32 pair of strings which have the same hash-code
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: antispam
• Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses]
  • From: antispam
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses]
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: rossum
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses]
  • From: zzz
• Disk encryption on USB without admin rights
  • From: Marlinde
• Re: Need CRC32 pair of strings which have the same hash-code
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses]
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Elliptic Curve Parameter Selection
  • From: Jeffrey Walton
• PIN Processing Weaknesses
  • From: JR
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: aeessex
• Re: Need CRC32 pair of strings which have the same hash-code
  • From: rick314
• Generate Key-Disk
  • From: djorgepbl
• Re: changes to sci.crypt charter
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: changes to sci.crypt charter
  • From: rossum
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: rossum
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: TC
• Re: changes to sci.crypt charter
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: jsavard
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Tim Smith
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: New formula?
  • From: mm
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: TC
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm
  • From: Felix Rawlings
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm
  • From: BRG
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Phil Carmody
• New formula?
  • From: mm
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: New Cryptographic Algorithm
  • From: Salami Man
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Elliptic Curve Parameter Selection
  • From: Jeffrey Walton
• Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm
  • From: Felix Rawlings
• Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm
  • From: jpr65
• Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: New Cryptographic Algorithm
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: Robert
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: xmath
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: TC
• Re: New Cryptographic Algorithm
  • From: jpr65
• Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm
  • From: jpr65
• Re: DES bitwise complement proof
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: Francois Grieu
• New Cryptographic Algorithm
  • From: jpr65
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Unruh
• Re: DES bitwise complement proof
  • From: Unruh
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: David Eather
• Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: wallbangicus
• Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: wallbangicus
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• DES bitwise complement proof
  • From: Jim
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: rossum
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: Unruh
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: camilavaclabo
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: TC
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: Robert
• Re: HMAC question
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: TC
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: TC
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: TC
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: Robert
• Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: rossum
• Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: Robert
• Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?
  • From: RobertoNL@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Greg Rose
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: zzz
• HMAC question
  • From: toan79
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: zzz
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: zzz
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted
  • From: mm
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: zzz
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: François Grieu
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: François Grieu
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: François Grieu
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Ernst Lippe
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Need CRC32 pair of strings which have the same hash-code
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: François Grieu
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• strange vigenere cipher
  • From: Senderos
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: laura fairhead
• Re: Chaum's punchscan
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: zzz
• Chaum's punchscan
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: vc6
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: vc6
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: Unruh
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: Unruh
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: vc6
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: vc6
• Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Need CRC32 pair of strings which have the same hash-code
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: cracking DES ciphertext with known plaintext using custom character set.
  • From: David Eather
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: David Eather
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: David Eather
• Need CRC32 pair of strings which have the same hash-code
  • From: sergey . korolev . dn
• Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: JR
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: rossum
• Re: cracking DES ciphertext with known plaintext using custom character set.
  • From: smith_ca
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: rossum
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: generating a nonce
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: zzz
• generating a nonce
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: Chris Kushnir
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: zzz
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: JiXian Yang
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: vc6
• Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: Paul Rubin
• libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt
  • From: vc6
• HEX calculators capable of +,-,XOR,AND ... with bitfields up to "Whirlpool" size (MD5 size is OK)?
  • From: Max Power
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: Combined Signature and Encryption Schemes.
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: zzz
• Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: TC
• Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted
  • From: Mike Scott
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: Ertugrul Soeylemez
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: zz
• Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted
  • From: mm
• Re: Where on the web can one find HEX calculators capable of +,-,XOR,AND ... with bitfields up to "Whirlpool" size?
  • From: driver
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: zz
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: zz
• Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: Hardware encryption acceleration
  • From: Felix Rawlings
• Re: Hardware encryption acceleration
  • From: Chumley Doright
• Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Hardware encryption acceleration
  • From: Unruh
• Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: wallbangicus
• Hardware encryption acceleration
  • From: bhima.pandava@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted
  • From: Thomas Vogler
• Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted
  • From: mm
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: mm
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Salami Man
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: zz
• Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: SHA-1 code for IBM Mainframe
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Where on the web can one find HEX calculators capable of +,-,XOR,AND ... with bitfields up to "Whirlpool" size?
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Where on the web can one find HEX calculators capable of +,-,XOR,AND ... with bitfields up to "Whirlpool" size?
  • From: Max Power
• Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted
  • From: mm
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: mm
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: SHA-1 code for IBM Mainframe
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: SHA-1 code for IBM Mainframe
  • From: robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Myn Seudop
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Tom St Denis
• SHA-1 code for IBM Mainframe
  • From: JR
• Re: Combined Signature and Encryption Schemes.
  • From: vedaal
• Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Can any one provide me with the encryption and decryption code of AES 256
  • From: rossum
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Can any one provide me with the encryption and decryption code of AES 256
  • From: Sumeet
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted
  • From: mail
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Salami Man
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Bruce Barnett
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Bodo Moeller
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: David Wagner
• Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: mm
• Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: wallbangicus
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: David Wagner
• Some good faith [LTC manuals]
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: TomsFastMath v0.10 released
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: TomsFastMath v0.10 released
  • From: Wolfgang Ehrhardt
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: TomsFastMath v0.10 released
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: TomsFastMath v0.10 released
  • From: Wolfgang Ehrhardt
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: How hard is it to break a ECDSA 49-bit prime field digital signature?
  • From: xcong2000
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: ipsec in ipv4 and v6
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: rossum
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: constructing a specified hash function
  • From: bobic
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Myn Seudop
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: TC
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Thomas ***in
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: How hard is it to break a ECDSA 49-bit prime field digital signature?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: constructing a specified hash function
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: constructing a specified hash function
  • From: bobic
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Re: constructing a specified hash function
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: Unruh
• Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: fermineutron
• Re: constructing a specified hash function
  • From: bobic
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Combined Signature and Encryption Schemes.
  • From: Mike Amling
• a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography
  • From: wallbangicus
• Re: Hash function based on block ciphers
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: look
• Re: constructing a specified hash function
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: look
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: look
• ipsec in ipv4 and v6
  • From: cfc
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: clark
• Re: constructing a specified hash function
  • From: bobic
• Re: Does anyone know how to find the owner of an e-mail address
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: Combined Signature and Encryption Schemes.
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Hash function based on block ciphers
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: Hash function based on block ciphers
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: rossum
• Re: Hash function based on block ciphers
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Bill Cox
• Combined Signature and Encryption Schemes.
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: How hard is it to break a ECDSA 49-bit prime field digital signature?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: How hard is it to break a ECDSA 49-bit prime field digital signature?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: How hard is it to break a ECDSA 49-bit prime field digital signature?
  • From: xcong2000
• Re: Does anyone know how to find the owner of an e-mail address
  • From: Ben Stilller
• Re: Does anyone know how to find the owner of an e-mail address
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: How hard is it to break a ECDSA 49-bit prime field digital signature?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Ivan Voras
• How hard is it to break a ECDSA 49-bit prime field digital signature?
  • From: xcong2000
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: rossum
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Myn Seudop
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: A history lesson for Joe Peschel
  • From: david . florman
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: constructing a specified hash function
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: François Grieu
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Securing ARC4
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Issue with SSL and Images
  • From: lars . adler
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Luc The ***e
• Securing ARC4
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Bill Cox
• Issue with SSL and Images
  • From: jason . hall
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Vlastimil Klima
• TomsFastMath v0.10 released
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Does anyone know how to find the owner of an e-mail address
  • From: Ben Stiller
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: TC
• Re: constructing a specified hash function
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: rossum
• Re: Hash function based on block ciphers
  • From: xmath
• Re: Does anyone know how to find the owner of an e-mail address
  • From: David Eather
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: TC
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Myn Seudop
• Re: AES use of constant
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: TC
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: TC
• Re: Secure hash algorithm vs block cipher based authentication
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: constructing a specified hash function
  • From: bobic
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Unruh
• Re: constructing a specified hash function
  • From: David Wagner
• constructing a specified hash function
  • From: bobic
• Does anyone know how to find the owner of an e-mail address
  • From: Diamond
• Re: Secure hash algorithm vs block cipher based authentication
  • From: Rein Anders Apeland
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: look
• Re: Secure hash algorithm vs block cipher based authentication
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Hash function based on block ciphers
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: cracking DES ciphertext with known plaintext using custom character set.
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• **theory-edge** mailing list
  • From: vznuri
• Hash function based on block ciphers
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: AES use of constant
  • From: amol
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Use of "Labels" in ISO 18033
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Secure hash algorithm vs block cipher based authentication
  • From: David Wagner
• Use of "Labels" in ISO 18033
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Secure hash algorithm vs block cipher based authentication
  • From: Rein Anders Apeland
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Unruh
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Unruh
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: AES use of constant
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: A history lesson for Joe Peschel
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Unruh
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Unruh
• Re: cracking DES ciphertext with known plaintext using custom character set.
  • From: Douglas A. Gwyn
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Alan
• Re: Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Hacking PGP WoT onto X.509 systems
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Unruh
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: AES use of constant
  • From: amol
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Unruh
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Unruh
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Unruh
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Hacking PGP WoT onto X.509 systems
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Hacking PGP WoT onto X.509 systems
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: TC

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• News
• Mailing-Lists
• Newsgroups
• Service
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

www.derkeiler.com  > Newsgroups  > sci.crypt  > 2006-11