sci.crypt

• Date Index

---

• performance of next generation hash functions, jd51a
  • Re: performance of next generation hash functions, Tom St Denis
• can you decrypt?, need . help . please
  • Re: can you decrypt?, Mike McNally
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • can you decrypt?, need . help . please
• ThreeBallot receipt ZK? ZI?, Mike Amling
• sorry guys, mantinin
• DES: left "circular shift" of key bits, Mike McNally
  • Re: DES: left "circular shift" of key bits, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
    • Re: DES: left "circular shift" of key bits, Mike McNally
  • Message not available
    • Re: DES: left "circular shift" of key bits, Mike McNally
• OT. Before it gets to Christmas time... My melancholic look back at the last year, David Eather
  • Re: OT. Before it gets to Christmas time... My melancholic look back at the last year, vedaal
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • OT. Before it gets to Christmas time... My melancholic look back at the last year, David Eather
    • Re: OT. Before it gets to Christmas time... My melancholic look back at the last year, david . florman
• questions about ASN.1, yawnmoth
  • Re: questions about ASN.1, Tom St Denis
  • Re: questions about ASN.1, Jeff Jacoby
    • Re: questions about ASN.1, lionet1
  • Re: questions about ASN.1, yawnmoth
    • Re: questions about ASN.1, Tom St Denis
    • Re: questions about ASN.1, Jeff Jacoby
• Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, Jan Panteltje
  • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, mm
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, zzz
    • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, Unruh
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, Unruh
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, panteltje
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, zzz
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, Unruh
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, REMOVE . spam
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, clark
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, clark
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, clark
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, clark
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, clark
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Interesting paper: On the Power of Simple Branch Prediction Analysis, Timoleon
• Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, gen_vlsi
  • Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, Unruh
      • Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, Unruh
      • Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, Felix Rawlings
      • Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, Felix Rawlings
      • Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, Tom St Denis
  • Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, Unruh
    • Message not available
      • Re: Comaprison between MD5 and SHA, Unruh
• Question from an intelligent (?) layman, Al
  • Re: Question from an intelligent (?) layman, Tim Peters
  • Re: Question from an intelligent (?) layman, Jean-Luc Cooke
  • Re: Question from an intelligent (?) layman, Unruh
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Question from an intelligent (?) layman, Al
    • Re: Question from an intelligent (?) layman, Kristian Gjøsteen
• CBC mac with LibTomCrypt, Ulf Reiman
  • Re: CBC mac with LibTomCrypt, Tom St Denis
• Got something to decrypt, martyK
  • Re: Got something to decrypt, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Got something to decrypt, Simon Johnson
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, noload
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, noload
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, noload
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, noload
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, Mel
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, Unruh
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, rossum
      • Re: Got something to decrypt, Luc The Perverse
• Algebraic cryptanalysis of DES, zabriskier
  • Re: Algebraic cryptanalysis of DES, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Algebraic cryptanalysis of DES, Unruh
      • Re: Algebraic cryptanalysis of DES, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Algebraic cryptanalysis of DES, Unruh
      • Re: Algebraic cryptanalysis of DES, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Algebraic cryptanalysis of DES, noload
• Secure hash function and AES, Zarathustra
  • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Tom St Denis
  • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Zarathustra
      • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Zarathustra
      • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Zarathustra
      • Message not available
      • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Zarathustra
      • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Tom St Denis
  • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Unruh
  • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Mike Amling
    • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Zarathustra
      • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Zarathustra
      • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: Secure hash function and AES, Jose Sanchez
• Re: Poly1305 vs. UMAC vs. new MAC1071, Tom St Denis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Poly1305 vs. UMAC vs. new MAC1071, xmath
    • Re: Poly1305 vs. UMAC vs. new MAC1071, D. J. Bernstein
• L15 prize increased to £100, Robin Carey
  • Re: L15 prize increased to £100, clark
• I leave you for now, Stratocaster
  • Re: I leave you for now, David Eather
    • Re: I leave you for now, Caleb
• Amazing !!!, youtube300
  • Re: Amazing !!!, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Amazing !!!, Salami Man
      • Re: Amazing !!!, Jean-Luc Cooke
• OT question re The Bells, Dante Alighieri
  • Re: OT question re The Bells, Dante Alighieri
• New RSA attack, James S. Singleton
  • Re: New RSA attack, Tom St Denis
  • Re: New RSA attack, David Wagner
    • Re: New RSA attack, Stratocaster
      • Re: New RSA attack, Tom St Denis
      • Re: New RSA attack, Stratocaster
      • Re: New RSA attack, Tom St Denis
      • Re: New RSA attack, Stratocaster
      • Re: New RSA attack, Tom St Denis
      • Re: New RSA attack, Stratocaster
      • Re: New RSA attack, antispam
      • Re: New RSA attack, Stratocaster
      • Re: New RSA attack, Tom St Denis
      • Re: New RSA attack, Alan
      • Re: New RSA attack, Carlos Moreno
      • Re: New RSA attack, Stratocaster
    • Re: New RSA attack, Alan
      • Re: New RSA attack, David Wagner
      • Re: New RSA attack, Rob Warnock
      • Re: New RSA attack, David Wagner
      • Re: New RSA attack, Rob Warnock
• Crypto export laws - anyone familiar?, Amish
  • Re: Crypto export laws - anyone familiar?, Unruh
    • Re: Crypto export laws - anyone familiar?, Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: Crypto export laws - anyone familiar?, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Crypto export laws - anyone familiar?, Unruh
• AC 2007 - (2nd call): 18 December 2006, natty2006@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Language as a cipher?, kalimaa
• CCM and EAX test vectors, arman
  • Re: CCM and EAX test vectors, Tom St Denis
    • Re: CCM and EAX test vectors, BRG
• Blowfish andDiffie Hellman, fahnaim
  • Re: Blowfish andDiffie Hellman, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Blowfish andDiffie Hellman, clark
• Re: ~ * A Morning Wood Too Close Too Home, noload
• Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers, Mike McNally
  • Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers, Christian Zietz
    • Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers, Mike McNally
      • Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers, secretcodebreaker
      • Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers, Mike McNally
      • Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers, secretcodebreaker
  • Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers, darklogic
  • Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers, darklogic
    • Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers, Mike McNally
      • Re: Programs for breaking Classic Ciphers, darklogic
• Leopard15/L15, Robin Carey
  • Re: Leopard15/L15, kalimaa
  • Re: Leopard15/L15, clark
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Leopard15/L15, clark
      • Re: Leopard15/L15, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Leopard15/L15, clark
      • Re: Leopard15/L15, David Eather
      • Message not available
      • Re: Leopard15/L15, David Eather
  • Message not available
    • Re: Leopard15/L15, Tom St Denis
• Strongest encryption algorithm, fermineutron
  • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, JiXian Yang
    • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, Chris McDonald
  • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, fermineutron
    • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, fermineutron
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, fermineutron
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, Woody Brison
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, Mike Amling
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, mike3
    • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, fermineutron
    • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, David Eather
  • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, Glenn P.,
    • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, fermineutron
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, duoduolei
  • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, jsavard
  • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, Peter van Liesdonk
    • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, fermineutron
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, David Eather
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, TomFoolery
  • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, Mark Wooding
  • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, giorgio.tani
    • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, Luc The Perverse
    • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, David Eather
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, giorgio . tani
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, David Eather
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, giorgio.tani
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, David Eather
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, Mike Amling
      • Re: Strongest encryption algorithm, giorgio . tani
• extracting the exponent / modulus from a *.pem file?, yawnmoth
  • Re: extracting the exponent / modulus from a *.pem file?, Peter S. May
    • Re: extracting the exponent / modulus from a *.pem file?, Peter Trei
  • Re: extracting the exponent / modulus from a *.pem file?, Peter van Liesdonk
• LibTomCrypt v1.15 released, Tom St Denis
  • Re: LibTomCrypt v1.15 released, Tom St Denis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • LibTomCrypt v1.15 released, Tom St Denis
    • Re: LibTomCrypt v1.15 released, Phil Carmody
  • LibTomCrypt v1.15 released, Tom St Denis
• Real numbers of entropy bits, Peter S. May
  • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, David Eather
  • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, David Wagner
  • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, David Wagner
    • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, Peter S. May
      • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, David Wagner
      • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, Peter S. May
      • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, David Wagner
      • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, Mike Amling
  • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, David Wagner
    • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, Peter S. May
      • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, David Wagner
      • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, David Wagner
  • Message not available
    • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, Peter S. May
      • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, David Wagner
      • Re: Real numbers of entropy bits, Peter S. May
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Peter Gutmann
  • Message not available
    • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, TC
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, David Eather
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, TC
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, David Eather
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, TC
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Ari Silverstein
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, TC
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, TC
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, TC
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Joseph Ashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Joseph Ashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Joseph Ashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, David Wagner
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, David Wagner
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, David Wagner
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Joseph Ashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Joseph Ashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, David Wagner
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Joseph Ashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Paul Rubin
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Joseph Ashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Joseph Ashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Joseph Ashwood
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, David Wagner
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, TC
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, David Wagner
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, TC
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, TC
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, PeteJ
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, TC
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, David Wagner
      • Message not available
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, TC
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, nobody
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Ari Silverstein
  • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Ari Silverstein
  • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Ari Silverstein
• finding inverse of a polynomial mod a primitive polynomial, mehreen
  • Re: finding inverse of a polynomial mod a primitive polynomial, hoz
  • Re: finding inverse of a polynomial mod a primitive polynomial, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: finding inverse of a polynomial mod a primitive polynomial, Mark Wooding
    • Re: finding inverse of a polynomial mod a primitive polynomial, mehreen
• Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Markus.Dichtl
  • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Markus.Dichtl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Bodo Moeller
    • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Markus.Dichtl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Markus.Dichtl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Markus.Dichtl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Markus.Dichtl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, David Wagner
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, David Wagner
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Bodo Moeller
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Markus.Dichtl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, David Wagner
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Markus.Dichtl.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Bodo Moeller
  • Decentralized article review [was:... review procedures], Peter Pearson
    • Re: Decentralized article review [was:... review procedures], David Wagner
      • Re: Decentralized article review [was:... review procedures], Tom St Denis
  • Message not available
    • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Scott Contini
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, David Wagner
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Scott Contini
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, Scott Contini
      • Re: Irregular review procedures for IACR sponsored conferences, David Wagner
• Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition), Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition), Johannes Kloos
    • Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition), Tom St Denis
      • Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition), mm
      • Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition), Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition), Jeffrey Walton
      • Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition), mm
  • Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition), Phil Carmody
    • Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition), Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition), Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Basic Elliptic Curve Question (A Definition), Jeffrey Walton
• 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, Gian-Carlo Pascutto
  • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, tedu
    • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, tedu
      • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
      • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, David Eather
      • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, Mike Amling
      • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, David Eather
  • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, David Eather
  • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, Mike Amling
  • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, David Eather
  • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, laura fairhead
  • Re: Better - lossless 5.3 bits storage per move, David Eather
  • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, riedel
    • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, Gian-Carlo Pascutto
      • Message not available
      • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
      • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, Mike Amling
      • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, David Eather
      • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, Gian-Carlo Pascutto
      • Re: 12 to 8 bit Hashes - application to chess, Mike Amling
• Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?, Guy Fawkes
  • Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?, Chris McDonald
  • Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?, BRG
      • Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?, BRG
      • Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?, Guy Fawkes
    • Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?, Guy Fawkes
  • Re: Which C/C++ Crypto Libraries?, Christophe Devine
• Help required - Cryptography career, Chokks
  • Re: Help required - Cryptography career, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: Help required - Cryptography career, Scott Contini
    • Re: Help required - Cryptography career, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Help required - Cryptography career, Rob Warnock
    • Re: Help required - Cryptography career, noel . catterall
• New attacks on the financial PIN processing, JR
  • Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing, uri
    • Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
      • Message not available
      • Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
      • Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
    • Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing, uri
      • Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
      • Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
      • Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
      • Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing, Luc The Perverse
      • Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing, uri
      • Re: New attacks on the financial PIN processing, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Fighting stupidity, Antti Louko
  • Re: Fighting stupidity, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Fighting stupidity, Antti Louko
    • Re: Fighting stupidity, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Fighting stupidity, Tom St Denis
      • Message not available
      • Re: Fighting stupidity, Tom St Denis
  • Re: Fighting stupidity, Thomas Pornin
    • Re: Fighting stupidity, David Wagner
      • Re: Fighting stupidity, Thomas Pornin
      • Re: Fighting stupidity, David Wagner
      • Re: Fighting stupidity, Thomas Pornin
    • Re: Fighting stupidity, Antti Louko
      • Re: Fighting stupidity, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: Fighting stupidity, David Wagner
  • Re: Fighting stupidity, Paul Rubin
• 6 round DES attack, Tom St Denis
  • Re: 6 round DES attack, Alan
    • Re: 6 round DES attack, Tom St Denis
      • Re: 6 round DES attack, Alan
  • Re: 6 round DES attack, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann
• J. Craptology, Nigel Smart
  • Re: J. Craptology, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: J. Craptology, vedaal
• LibTomMath overflow bug, Tom St Denis
  • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, mm
    • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Tom St Denis
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Luc The Perverse
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Tom St Denis
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Luc The Perverse
    • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Tom St Denis
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, mm
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Tom St Denis
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, mm
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Tom St Denis
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, mm
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Tom St Denis
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Charles Redmon
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Tom St Denis
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, zzz
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Tom St Denis
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Charles Redmon
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, zzz
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Tom St Denis
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, zzz
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Tom St Denis
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Charles Redmon
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, zzz
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Charles Redmon
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Phil Carmody
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Charles Redmon
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Frank W. Steiner
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Charles Redmon
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, mm
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Tom St Denis
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, ink
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, mm
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, zzz
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, mm
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, David Eather
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, mm
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, David Eather
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, mm
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, David Eather
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, mm
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, zzz
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, mm
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, zzz
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Tom St Denis
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, zzz
    • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Simon Johnson
      • Re: LibTomMath overflow bug, Ivan Voras
  • To Tom St Denis, Marcolippo
    • Re: To Tom St Denis, mm
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • LibTomMath overflow bug, Tom St Denis
• new question, Antony Clements
  • Re: new question, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: new question, Antony Clements
      • Re: new question, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: new question, Antony Clements
      • Re: new question, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: new question, Antony Clements
      • Re: new question, Antony Clements
      • Re: new question, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: new question, Tom St Denis
      • Re: new question, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: new question, Antony Clements
      • Re: new question, Antony Clements
      • Re: new question, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: new question, Antony Clements
      • Re: new question, Tom St Denis
      • Re: new question, Antony Clements
      • Re: new question, Tom St Denis
      • Re: new question, Antony Clements
      • Re: new question, rossum
      • Re: new question, Antony Clements
      • Re: new question, TC
      • Re: new question, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: new question, Antony Clements
• General hints for newbie cryptanalysis, Ray Ingles
  • Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis, Phil Carmody
  • Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis, Luc The Perverse
    • Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis, Ray Ingles
  • Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis, TC
    • Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis, TC
    • Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis, sorceror171
      • Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis, TC
      • Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis, sorceror171
      • Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis, TC
      • Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis, Ray Ingles
      • Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis, TC
  • Re: General hints for newbie cryptanalysis, billcoder
• Codex - Channel 4, ben . stiff
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Codex - Channel 4, ben . stiff
• IPsec/IKE Practical Protocol Question, Anonymous
• Hex to Float conversion of GPS Latitude, volosov
• A Deadly Message Regarding ANNA KUBIT, WARNING!
• Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks, fermineutron
  • Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks, David Wagner
  • Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks, Douglas A. Gwyn
    • Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks, Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks, fermineutron
      • Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks, David Wagner
      • Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks, Unruh
  • Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks, davvid_a_scott
    • Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks, Unruh
  • Re: Quantum computing and Brute Force Attacks, Unruh
• Re: Important Information, zzz
• Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Marlinde
  • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, rossum
    • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, antispam
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, David Eather
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, antispam
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, David Eather
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, giorgio.tani
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, David Eather
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, giorgio.tani
      • Message not available
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Unruh
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, David Eather
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Glenn P.,
    • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Marlinde
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, rossum
  • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, TC
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Message not available
    • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Marlinde
      • Message not available
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Unruh
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Nospam12
    • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, toader@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Marlinde
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Nospam12
      • Message not available
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, Nospam12
      • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, TC
  • Re: Disk encryption on USB without admin rights, voyagor
• PIN Processing Weaknesses, JR
  • Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses], Peter Pearson
    • Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses], zzz
      • Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses], Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses], antispam
      • Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses], David Eather
      • Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses], antispam
      • Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses], David Eather
      • Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses], zzz
      • Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses], David Eather
      • Re: Newsgroup spam [was: PIN Processing Weaknesses], zzz
• Generate Key-Disk, djorgepbl
  • Re: Generate Key-Disk, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Generate Key-Disk, djorgepbl
      • Re: Generate Key-Disk, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Generate Key-Disk, djorgepbl
      • Re: Generate Key-Disk, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Generate Key-Disk, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Generate Key-Disk, djorgepbl
      • Re: Generate Key-Disk, Joseph Ashwood
• Re: changes to sci.crypt charter, Phil Carmody
  • Re: changes to sci.crypt charter, Jean-Luc Cooke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: changes to sci.crypt charter, rossum
• New formula?, mm
  • Message not available
    • Re: New formula?, mm
• Elliptic Curve Parameter Selection, Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Elliptic Curve Parameter Selection, Jeffrey Walton
  • Re: Elliptic Curve Parameter Selection, amzoti
    • Re: Elliptic Curve Parameter Selection, mm
• Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm, jpr65
  • Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm, Peter van Liesdonk
    • Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm, jpr65
      • Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm, Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm, Felix Rawlings
      • Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm, Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm, Unruh
      • Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm, BRG
      • Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm, Felix Rawlings
      • Re: Prime Shuffle: A new cryptographic algorithm, Peter van Liesdonk
• New Cryptographic Algorithm, jpr65
  • Re: New Cryptographic Algorithm, jpr65
    • Re: New Cryptographic Algorithm, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: New Cryptographic Algorithm, Salami Man
• DES bitwise complement proof, Jim
  • Re: DES bitwise complement proof, Unruh
  • Re: DES bitwise complement proof, Francois Grieu
• Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, RobertoNL@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, David Eather
    • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, Robert
  • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, Paul Rubin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, Robert
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, rossum
    • Message not available
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, Robert
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, rossum
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, Robert
    • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, TC
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, TC
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, Ivan Voras
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, TC
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, Robert
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, TC
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, Robert
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, David Eather
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, Robert
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, David Eather
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, Robert
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, Mark Wooding
      • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, TC
    • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, Jean-Luc Cooke
    • Re: Can this be done with a symmetric cipher?, jsavard
• HMAC question, toan79
  • Re: HMAC question, Matthew Fanto
  • Re: HMAC question, Mark Wooding
  • Re: HMAC question, David Wagner
• strange vigenere cipher, Senderos
• Chaum's punchscan, Phil Carmody
  • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
    • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Peter Pearson
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, aeessex
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Bruce Stephens
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, aeessex
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
    • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Tim Smith
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, David Wagner
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
  • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
  • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
    • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, xmath
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
      • Re: Chaum's punchscan, Mike Amling
• Need CRC32 pair of strings which have the same hash-code, sergey . korolev . dn
  • Re: Need CRC32 pair of strings which have the same hash-code, Francois Grieu
  • Re: Need CRC32 pair of strings which have the same hash-code, Mike Amling
    • Re: Need CRC32 pair of strings which have the same hash-code, rick314
      • Re: Need CRC32 pair of strings which have the same hash-code, Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Need CRC32 pair of strings which have the same hash-code, Mike Amling
• Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, Francois Grieu
  • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, Peter Pearson
    • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, Francois Grieu
      • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, laura fairhead
      • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, François Grieu
      • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, David Wagner
      • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, François Grieu
  • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, Unruh
    • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, Francois Grieu
      • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, Unruh
  • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, David Wagner
    • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, David Wagner
      • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, François Grieu
      • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, David Wagner
      • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, Francois Grieu
      • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, Francois Grieu
      • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, Unruh
      • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, David Wagner
  • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, Mike Amling
    • Re: Random delay as a countermeasure to timing attacks, François Grieu
• generating a nonce, Antony Clements
  • Re: generating a nonce, Phil Carmody
    • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Re: generating a nonce, Phil Carmody
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
    • Re: generating a nonce, rossum
      • Re: generating a nonce, Matthew Fanto
    • Re: generating a nonce, David Eather
    • Message not available
      • Re: generating a nonce, Ernst Lippe
    • Message not available
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Re: generating a nonce, Greg Rose
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Re: generating a nonce, David Eather
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Re: generating a nonce, David Eather
      • Message not available
      • Re: generating a nonce, David Eather
      • Re: generating a nonce, TC
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Re: generating a nonce, TC
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Re: generating a nonce, TC
      • Re: generating a nonce, rossum
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Re: generating a nonce, rossum
      • Re: generating a nonce, David Eather
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: generating a nonce, TC
      • Message not available
      • Re: generating a nonce, TC
      • Message not available
      • Re: generating a nonce, TC
      • Message not available
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
      • Re: generating a nonce, Unruh
      • Re: generating a nonce, Antony Clements
• libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, vc6
  • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, Paul Rubin
    • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, vc6
      • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, Paul Rubin
      • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, vc6
      • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, Unruh
      • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, vc6
      • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, vc6
      • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, Paul Rubin
      • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, JiXian Yang
  • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, Chris Kushnir
  • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, zzz
    • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, JR
    • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, David Eather
      • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, vc6
  • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, rossum
    • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, Ivan Voras
  • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, camilavaclabo
    • Re: libtomcrypt vs. libgcrypt, Unruh
• Hardware encryption acceleration, bhima.pandava@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Hardware encryption acceleration, Unruh
    • Re: Hardware encryption acceleration, Chumley Doright
    • Re: Hardware encryption acceleration, Felix Rawlings
• Where on the web can one find HEX calculators capable of +,-,XOR,AND ... with bitfields up to "Whirlpool" size?, Max Power
  • Re: Where on the web can one find HEX calculators capable of +,-,XOR,AND ... with bitfields up to "Whirlpool" size?, Rob Warnock
  • Re: Where on the web can one find HEX calculators capable of +,-,XOR,AND ... with bitfields up to "Whirlpool" size?, driver
    • HEX calculators capable of +,-,XOR,AND ... with bitfields up to "Whirlpool" size (MD5 size is OK)?, Max Power
      • Re: HEX calculators capable of +,-,XOR,AND ... with bitfields up to "Whirlpool" size (MD5 size is OK)?, Doug Stell
• SHA-1 code for IBM Mainframe, JR
  • Re: SHA-1 code for IBM Mainframe, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: SHA-1 code for IBM Mainframe, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
  • Re: SHA-1 code for IBM Mainframe, Ari Silverstein
• Can any one provide me with the encryption and decryption code of AES 256, Sumeet
  • Re: Can any one provide me with the encryption and decryption code of AES 256, rossum
• Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted, mail
  • Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted, mm
      • Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted, mm
      • Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted, Thomas Vogler
      • Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted, mm
      • Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted, Mike Scott
      • Re: Generating Elliptic Curve over ZZp with given number of Points / Program wanted, mm
• Some good faith [LTC manuals], Tom St Denis
  • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], mm
    • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], Tom St Denis
  • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], Tom St Denis
    • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], Tom St Denis
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], Tom St Denis
  • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], Salami Man
  • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], Ari Silverstein
    • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], Salami Man
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], zz
      • Message not available
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], zz
      • Message not available
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], Phil Carmody
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], TC
      • Message not available
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], zzz
      • Message not available
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], zzz
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], David Eather
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], zzz
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], zzz
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], zzz
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], David Eather
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], zzz
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], zzz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Some good faith [LTC manuals], Tom St Denis
    • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], Myn Seudop
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], Tom St Denis
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], mm
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], zz
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], mm
      • Re: Some good faith [LTC manuals], zz
  • Some good faith [LTC manuals], Tom St Denis
• a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, wallbangicus
  • Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, fermineutron
  • Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, Matthew Fanto
  • Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, Unruh
  • Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, Phil Carmody
  • Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, rossum
  • Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, Jean-Luc Cooke
    • Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, wallbangicus
      • Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, wallbangicus
      • Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, Unruh
      • Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
      • Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, wallbangicus
      • Re: a way psuedo random numbers can be used in cryptography, wallbangicus
• ipsec in ipv4 and v6, cfc
  • Re: ipsec in ipv4 and v6, Jean-Luc Cooke
• Combined Signature and Encryption Schemes., fabrice . gautier
  • Re: Combined Signature and Encryption Schemes., Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Combined Signature and Encryption Schemes., Mike Amling
      • Re: Combined Signature and Encryption Schemes., vedaal
      • Re: Combined Signature and Encryption Schemes., Mike Amling
• How hard is it to break a ECDSA 49-bit prime field digital signature?, xcong2000
  • Re: How hard is it to break a ECDSA 49-bit prime field digital signature?, Tom St Denis
    • Re: How hard is it to break a ECDSA 49-bit prime field digital signature?, xcong2000
      • Re: How hard is it to break a ECDSA 49-bit prime field digital signature?, Tom St Denis
      • Re: How hard is it to break a ECDSA 49-bit prime field digital signature?, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: How hard is it to break a ECDSA 49-bit prime field digital signature?, xcong2000
    • Re: How hard is it to break a ECDSA 49-bit prime field digital signature?, Joseph Ashwood
• Securing ARC4, Bill Cox
  • Re: Securing ARC4, Unruh
    • Re: Securing ARC4, Bill Cox
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Unruh
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Bill Cox
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Francois Grieu
  • Re: Securing ARC4, François Grieu
    • Re: Securing ARC4, Bill Cox
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Francois Grieu
  • Re: Securing ARC4, David Wagner
    • Re: Securing ARC4, Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Bill Cox
    • Re: Securing ARC4, Bill Cox
      • Re: Securing ARC4, David Wagner
      • Re: Securing ARC4, rossum
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Bill Cox
      • Re: Securing ARC4, rossum
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Bill Cox
      • Re: Securing ARC4, David Wagner
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Bill Cox
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Thomas Pornin
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Securing ARC4, David Wagner
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Bill Cox
      • Re: Securing ARC4, David Wagner
      • Message not available
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Unruh
      • Message not available
      • Re: Securing ARC4, David Wagner
      • Message not available
      • Re: Securing ARC4, David Wagner
      • Message not available
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Unruh
      • Message not available
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Unruh
      • Message not available
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Unruh
      • Message not available
      • Re: Securing ARC4, David Wagner
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Bodo Moeller
      • Re: Securing ARC4, David Wagner
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Unruh
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Securing ARC4, Paul Rubin
  • Re: Securing ARC4, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: Securing ARC4, Simon Johnson
• Issue with SSL and Images, jason . hall
  • Re: Issue with SSL and Images, lars . adler
• TomsFastMath v0.10 released, Tom St Denis
  • Re: TomsFastMath v0.10 released, Wolfgang Ehrhardt
    • Re: TomsFastMath v0.10 released, Tom St Denis
      • Re: TomsFastMath v0.10 released, Wolfgang Ehrhardt
      • Re: TomsFastMath v0.10 released, Tom St Denis
• Re: comments on cipher please, Peter van Liesdonk
  • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
    • Re: comments on cipher please, Peter van Liesdonk
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
    • Message not available
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Myn Seudop
  • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Tom St Denis
    • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), mm
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Myn Seudop
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), mm
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), mm
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Myn Seudop
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Tom St Denis
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Tom St Denis
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), mm
    • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), look
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Tom St Denis
  • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), look
    • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Luc The Perverse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Tom St Denis
    • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Tom St Denis
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Tom St Denis
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), mm
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Bruce Barnett
• constructing a specified hash function, bobic
  • Re: constructing a specified hash function, David Wagner
    • Re: constructing a specified hash function, bobic
      • Re: constructing a specified hash function, Peter van Liesdonk
      • Re: constructing a specified hash function, bobic
      • Re: constructing a specified hash function, David Wagner
      • Re: constructing a specified hash function, bobic
      • Re: constructing a specified hash function, David Wagner
      • Re: constructing a specified hash function, bobic
      • Re: constructing a specified hash function, David Wagner
      • Re: constructing a specified hash function, bobic
      • Re: constructing a specified hash function, David Wagner
• Does anyone know how to find the owner of an e-mail address, Diamond
  • Re: Does anyone know how to find the owner of an e-mail address, David Eather
  • Re: Does anyone know how to find the owner of an e-mail address, Ben Stiller
    • Re: Does anyone know how to find the owner of an e-mail address, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Does anyone know how to find the owner of an e-mail address, Ben Stilller
      • Re: Does anyone know how to find the owner of an e-mail address, Ari Silverstein
• **theory-edge** mailing list, vznuri
• Hash function based on block ciphers, fabrice . gautier
  • Re: Hash function based on block ciphers, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Hash function based on block ciphers, xmath
      • Re: Hash function based on block ciphers, fabrice . gautier
      • Re: Hash function based on block ciphers, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: Hash function based on block ciphers, fabrice . gautier
      • Re: Hash function based on block ciphers, Mike Amling
• Use of