Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
- From: "TC" <aatcbbtccctc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Oct 2006 03:06:32 -0800
Bill Cox wrote:
By applying [RC4] twice, it's no longer a stream cipher.
Yes it is!
The first encryption is with a random
256-byte key, which is pre-pended to the data for the second pass.
This achieves nothing. Kirchoff's(sp?) Principle means the attacker
knows that you have done this. It adds nothing to the securty of the
final result.
This doubles the run-time, but hopefully gets around the issue of using
unique keys each time.
No it doesn't. You still must not re-use the "outer" key. If you don't
understand this, you should not try using a stream cipher (yours or
anyone else's) until you've done some more research!
HTH,
TC (MVP MSAccess)
http://tc2.atspace.com
.
- References:
- Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
- From: Bill Cox
- Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
- From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
- From: Bill Cox
- Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
- From: Bill Cox
- Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
- Prev by Date: Re: [USENET] Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- Next by Date: Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
- Previous by thread: Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
- Next by thread: Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
- Index(es):