Re: MD5 for passwords
- From: Unruh <unruh-spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Oct 2006 07:21:09 GMT
Ivan Voras <ivoras@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
In light of (fairly recent) attacks on MD5, is it still safe enough to
use in password hashing, for example in unix-passwd-like salted password
hashes?
The Unix password hashes that use md5 do not use raw md5 they use a n
extremely convoluted series of operations including multiple uses of md5.
The best attack is still a dictionary search.
Related to this, how do attacks vary with the length of hashed string
(pre-image)? I'd guess that longer documents more vulnerable, but is it
true?
They don't. there are an infinity of strings which hash to that same value.
Most have more than 128 bits.
If your string is less than 128 bits, then exhaustive search is still the
best bet.
.
- References:
- MD5 for passwords
- From: Ivan Voras
- MD5 for passwords
- Prev by Date: Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- Next by Date: Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- Previous by thread: Re: MD5 for passwords
- Next by thread: Re: MD5 for passwords
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|