Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- From: mm <mm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:49:59 +0100
Luc The Perverse a écrit :
"mm" <mm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:4544e1c4$0$30604$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxLuc The Perverse a écrit :"mm" <mm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:45441d79$0$3692$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSo?You were the one bitching.Which contributions are you talking of? His "First, *** off"? His"Hey, I published this, I pusblished that, $60. But I am not spammingLighten up, mm. When you've contributed as much to this
since I am not giving links." The only fact you come to talk about your
books whereas nobody asked you anything is already spamming. (But, as
someone recently pointed it, you have rights others have not: you are
a public service.)
community as Tom has, I'll be happy to read your book
announcements here, too.
"Shut up little prick"? His attacks against people like Bernstein or
Schneier? What else? His library? But I know a lot of C libraries
written by people who have a math level superior to the one of a
dozen of oysters.
Now, whether you like his library or not, that's your right and,
overall, that's not my problem.
Hey wait - you are still the one bitching
TSD is a guy who is able to writeThat said, if EVERY POST I write offends you so, why am I not in yourwhereas two days before he came to play "Cybercop strikes again" with
killfile?
MOMNOUGUI (to cite one of his most recent contributions). He could
simply put him in his killfile without replying him, no? So why he
didn't do that? As usual, the rule is good for the others but not for
him?
Btw, what do you think about the way he insulted Schneier a few weeks
ago (to cite an other of his contributions)? I didn't see you trying to
defend Schneier like you are trying to defend TSD now.
Note that I do not contest your right to do so. I am not even surprised
that someone comes to defend TSD. In a world where the Spice Girls
succeed in selling CD's, it is clear that even TSD can have a fan club.
I wasn't paying attention a few weeks ago.
And that was person to person
Not quite. TSD was not talking to Schneier.
- you are insulting someone indirectly.
First, TSD is not just someone. He is above the "mélée", he is a member
of the very closed "We do'ers" club.
Second, which insult? I say that TSD has no skill at doing maths. This
is not an insult, this is a fact. Now, though not being good at maths is
not an infirmity [*], if I have to use a maths library, I prefer to use
a library written by someone who is a little more than almost totally
clueless rather than the contrary.
[*] Fortunately. I am not very good myself.
I am more likely to defend a person in such a situation
I'm not even sure defend is the right word - it was more of a stop whining kind of thing.
That's what I understood.
mm
.
- References:
- Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- From: JiXian Yang
- Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- From: Tom St Denis
- Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- From: mm
- Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- From: Peter Pearson
- Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- From: mm
- Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- From: Luc The Perverse
- Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- From: mm
- Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- From: Luc The Perverse
- Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- Prev by Date: Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
- Next by Date: Re: MAC autentication of several packets in sensor network questions
- Previous by thread: Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- Next by thread: Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- Index(es):