Re: comments on cipher please
- From: "Antony Clements" <antony.clements@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:30:39 +1100
<snip>
Then you'd better read it again entirely, and try to understand the<end snip>
content.
again you assume it is not part of my referrence material. it doesnt change
the fact that it is possible, but to say it is extremely improbable is an
understatement. one can not create a truly secure cipher without knowing the
existing attacks and how they affect the cipher.
.
- References:
- comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Matthew Fanto
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Matthew Fanto
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Matthew Fanto
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Matthew Fanto
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: TC
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- comments on cipher please
- Prev by Date: Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- Next by Date: Re: comments on cipher please
- Previous by thread: Re: comments on cipher please
- Next by thread: Re: comments on cipher please
- Index(es):