Re: comments on cipher please
- From: "Antony Clements" <antony.clements@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:35:20 +1100
<snip>
No would you PLEASE read Bruce Schneier's comment about amateur<end snip>
cryptographers? He explicitly tells why your break-fix-break-fix-cycle is
utterly nonsense.
why does everyone assume i have not read the available material? I have read
that comment and i am even a member of his mailing list. in his comment he
says that the likelyhood of an amateur design being secure is highly
unlikely verging on the impossible. that is not to say that it doesnt
happen, it is saying that the likelyhood of an amateur designing a secure
cipher is 1 in several billion.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: David Wagner
- Re: comments on cipher please
- References:
- comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Kristian Gjøsteen
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Matthew Fanto
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Matthew Fanto
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Matthew Fanto
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Matthew Fanto
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: TC
- Re: comments on cipher please
- From: Antony Clements
- comments on cipher please
- Prev by Date: Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- Next by Date: Re: comments on cipher please
- Previous by thread: Re: comments on cipher please
- Next by thread: Re: comments on cipher please
- Index(es):