Math field, corrupted in late 1800's
- From: jstevh@xxxxxxx
- Date: 26 Oct 2006 17:47:06 -0700
The math field was corrupted in that late 1800's in number theory, when
some rather intriguing mistakes were made leading to the acceptance of
ideal theory.
The unfortunate response of mathematicians at the time was to declare
the area "pure" and talk as if non-practicality were good!!!
That gave free rein for the error to propagate and opened the door for
cons, people without consciences who learned how to talk math-ese, and
work together, to maintain that wrong results not proven mathematically
were correct.
Over a hundred years later, we have a system that is fully corrupted
and capable of claiming just about anything, so no, Andrew Wiles did
not prove FLT, and you can find all kinds of interesting problems and
mistakes and amazing denial when it comes to important mathematical
arguments, like, um, how many of you know of Plotnikov and his claims
of proving P=NP?
After years of effort I just found a way to generalize the factoring
problem.
Seems like no one noticed that
x^2 - y^2 = 0 mod T
was just a first step--a primitive case of a more generalized set of
equations:
so add
S - 2xk = 0 mod T
and you have
(x+k)^2 = y^2 + S + k^2 + nT :
where you pick S, k and n, and n is just a difference from the other
two equations.
Now that is just a damn good idea, but you won't hear mathematicians
getting excited about it as they're cons in a corrupt system hoping to
hold on to the lie of their supposed mathematical discoveries against
the reality of mine, and the mistakes that entered into the field in
the late 1800's.
Kind of dramatic eh?
I wish it were wrong. I kind of put up these equations hoping they are
wrong, so I can focus on my other mathematical research without
worrying about the fate of the world.
Proof against the field is its continuing to ignore this research.
Time is part of my prosecutorial argument.
They knew, they bet the world, and they will lose. But remember, they
put other people's lives on the line, and for what?
For math lies?
James Harris
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt
- Next by Date: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- Previous by thread: Re:
- Next by thread: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
