Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
- From: Mike Amling <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 08 Oct 2006 21:17:01 EDT
Phil Carmody wrote:
You are checking that it actually detects isomorphisms too, aren't you? You've not explicitly said so. Else here's an O(1) algorithm which correctly differentiates all of the examples you've listed so far.
are_isomorphic(M1, M2) = are_identical(M1,M2)
Not to worry. Francois Grieu has proved that there are no false negatives. (Je ne comprends pas la preuve. Elle implique beaucoup d'onduler de main.)
--Mike Amling
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
- From: Francois Grieu
- Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
- From: Francois Grieu
- Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
- References:
- Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
- From: Bill Cox
- Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
- From: Bill Cox
- Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
- From: Bill Cox
- Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
- From: Bill Cox
- Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
- Prev by Date: Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
- Next by Date: Too many Fortuna pools
- Previous by thread: Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
- Next by thread: Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|