sci.crypt

• Thread Index

---

• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: Tom St Denis
• GeneralName.x400Address syntax
  • From: ba . hons
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: TC
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: TC
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: TC
• Re: [USENET] Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: TC
• Re: Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: TC
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: clark
• Re: MAC autentication of several packets in sensor network questions
  • From: U Karlsson
• Re: MAC autentication of several packets in sensor network questions
  • From: U Karlsson
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: clark
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: clark
• Re: Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: me
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Newbie question about AES encryption
  • From: Mark
• Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: MD5 for passwords
  • From: David Wagner
• [USENET] Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: me
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: look
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: look
• MD5 for passwords
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: MAC autentication of several packets in sensor network questions
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: AES use of constant
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: MAC autentication of several packets in sensor network questions
  • From: Tom St Denis
• desperate ??
  • From: flyawayteeks
• MAC autentication of several packets in sensor network questions
  • From: U Karlsson
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: clark
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Another Dumb Idea for Debunking...
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: clark
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: clark
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Weak keys for ElGamal
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: Weak keys for ElGamal
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Weak keys for ElGamal
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Weak keys for ElGamal
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Weak keys for ElGamal
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Weak keys for ElGamal
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Weak keys for ElGamal
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: mm
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Weak keys for ElGamal
  • From: Anton Berg
• Re: Weak keys for ElGamal
  • From: Anton Berg
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: kurt wismer
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: JiXian Yang
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Weak keys for ElGamal
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Weak keys for ElGamal
  • From: Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: Weak keys for ElGamal
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: ADVERT: Secure communications
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Weak keys for ElGamal
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Questions about DH and MQVs
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Questions about DH and MQVs
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: Questions about DH and MQVs
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: JSH: Go with prime counting
  • From: Jesse F. Hughes
• Weak keys for ElGamal
  • From: Anton Berg
• Point taken (Was Re: ADVERT: Secure communications)
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: password strength
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: ADVERT: Secure communications
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: ADVERT: Secure communications
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: ADVERT: Secure communications
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Questions about DH and MQVs
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: ADVERT: Secure communications
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Questions about DH and MQVs
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: OMAC coding
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: password strength
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: rossum
• Is it true, Joe?
  • From: david . florman
• Re: OMAC coding
  • From: U Karlsson
• Fermath
  • From: Giulia Biagini
• Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt
  • From: xcong2000
• Re: OMAC coding
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: OMAC coding
  • From: U Karlsson
• Re: password strength
  • From: Sal
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: TC
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: COMPRENDRE LA CRYPTOLOGIE DANS LES CADRES REGLEMENTAIRE, REGULATEUR, LE REGIME JURIDIQUE DES TELECOMMUNICATIONS ET LES POSSIBLES APPLICATIONS AU CAMEROUN
  • From: MOMNOUGUI
• Re: OMAC coding
  • From: David Wagner
• AES use of constant
  • From: amol
• Re: password strength
  • From: ink
• Re: password strength
  • From: ink
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: OMAC coding
  • From: U Karlsson
• Re: OMAC coding
  • From: U Karlsson
• Re: OMAC coding
  • From: U Karlsson
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: password strength
  • From: David Wagner
• Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Math field, corrupted in late 1800's
  • From: jstevh
• Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re:
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt
  • From: xcong2000
• Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: OMAC coding
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: OMAC coding
  • From: Peter Pearson
• A history lesson for Joe Peschel
  • From: david . florman
• Re: password strength
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt
  • From: xcong2000
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: rossum
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: rossum
• Re: password strength
  • From: ink
• Re: password strength
  • From: TC
• Re: OMAC coding
  • From: U Karlsson
• Re: password strength
  • From: ink
• Re: best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation
  • From: clark
• Re: OMAC coding
  • From: David Wagner
• OMAC coding
  • From: U Karlsson
• Re: password strength
  • From: Unruh
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: password strength
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: password strength
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: password strength
  • From: pegguru
• password strength
  • From: Sal
• Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt
  • From: Mike Scott
• Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt
  • From: xcong2000
• cracking DES ciphertext with known plaintext using custom character set.
  • From: smith_ca
• Re: Does something like this exist?
  • From: gmarkowsky
• Re: Does something like this exist?
  • From: gmarkowsky
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: TC
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: COMPRENDRE LA CRYPTOLOGIE DANS LES CADRES REGLEMENTAIRE, REGULATEUR, LE REGIME JURIDIQUE DES TELECOMMUNICATIONS ET LES POSSIBLES APPLICATIONS AU CAMEROUN
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation
  • From: clark
• COMPRENDRE LA CRYPTOLOGIE DANS LES CADRES REGLEMENTAIRE, REGULATEUR, LE REGIME JURIDIQUE DES TELECOMMUNICATIONS ET LES POSSIBLES APPLICATIONS AU CAMEROUN
  • From: MOMNOUGUI
• Re: best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: David Eather
• Re: best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation
  • From: Tom St Denis
• best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation
  • From: jesuraj.vinoth@xxxxxxxxx
• Black Dahlia cracked?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Article on Authentidate's Proving Test
  • From: mh
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Self Shrinking Generator
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Does something like this exist?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Does something like this exist?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Mike Amling
• Does something like this exist?
  • From: gmarkowsky
• Self Shrinking Generator
  • From: avigadl
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: mislavb
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: mislavb
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: mislavb
• Re: Questions about DH and MQVs
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Questions about DH and MQVs
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: mislavb
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: mislavb
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: TC
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: TC
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: mislavb
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: mislavb
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: mike3
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: mike3
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Questions about DH and MQVs
  • From: fabrice . gautier
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Article on Authentidate's Proving Test
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Article on Authentidate's Proving Test
  • From: mh
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: Unruh
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Mark
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: mike3
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Mark
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Formal proofs of security
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Article on Authentidate's Proving Test
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Mark
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: TC
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: TC
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: David Eather
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Matthew Fanto
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Mark
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Mark
• Re: Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Server side encryption - Newbie
  • From: Mark
• CFP: APPLIED COMPUTING 2007 - Submission Deadline extended
  • From: natty2006@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: mislavb
• Re: Algorithm idea
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Algorithm idea
  • From: mislavb
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: TC
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Formal proofs of security
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Article on Authentidate's Proving Test
  • From: mh
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: David Eather
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: Dave Thompson
• Formal proofs of security
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Yao's Millionaire Problem
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• comments on cipher please
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: TomsFastMath ported to the AVR32 [and looking for help]
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: is there any way that have a lightweight transmission overhead in broadcast encryption
  • From: Ele C . Tron
• Re: TomsFastMath ported to the AVR32 [and looking for help]
  • From: Phil Carmody
• is there any way that have a lightweight transmission overhead in broadcast encryption
  • From: chir0
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• TomsFastMath ported to the AVR32 [and looking for help]
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: David Eather
• Re: meaning of correctness property
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Yao's Millionaire Problem
  • From: jjb
• Re: Yao's Millionaire Problem
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: TC
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: kurt wismer
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• meaning of correctness property
  • From: HyperCracking
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Unruh
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: David Eather
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• Yao's Millionaire Problem
  • From: jjb
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: David Eather
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: David Eather
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: mike3
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: Unruh
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: TC
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: Julio C. Hernandez Castro
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: TC
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: TC
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Johnny Bravo
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: mike3
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: mike3
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: zk-proof on ElGamal ciphertext
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: i'm tired, i'll have another chocolate
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: i'm tired, i'll have another chocolate
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: kurt wismer
• Re: zk-proof on ElGamal ciphertext
  • From: Xi Yung
• Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: i'm tired, i'll have another chocolate
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?
  • From: François Grieu
• Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Program to decode scytale cypher
  • From: Tobias Matzat
• Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?
  • From: Dilbertarian
• Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?
  • From: Dilbertarian
• Re: i'm tired, i'll have another chocolate
  • From: Deryck
• Need 802.11-1999 FHSS test vectors
  • From: bardia . alavi
• Re: zk-proof on ElGamal ciphertext
  • From: Xi Yung
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: mfanto
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: breaking 1 block of ciphertext encrypted using 3TDES
  • From: clark
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Sergei
• Re: a few questions about AES
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• a few questions about AES
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: zk-proof on ElGamal ciphertext
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Sergei
• Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: da5id65536
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: kurt wismer
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: da5id65536
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: i'm tired, i'll have another chocolate
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: breaking 1 block of ciphertext encrypted using 3TDES
  • From: marvind
• Re: breaking 1 block of ciphertext encrypted using 3TDES
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Sergei
• Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: breaking 1 block of ciphertext encrypted using 3TDES
  • From: marvind
• Re: breaking 1 block of ciphertext encrypted using 3TDES
  • From: Scott Fluhrer
• Re: 2.5
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: breaking 1 block of ciphertext encrypted using 3TDES
  • From: marvind
• breaking 1 block of ciphertext encrypted using 3TDES
  • From: marvind
• Re: zk-proof on ElGamal ciphertext
  • From: Xi Yung
• Re: 2.5
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: Unruh
• Re: i'm tired, i'll have another chocolate
  • From: Anabaena Microcystis
• Re: zk-proof on ElGamal ciphertext
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Sergei
• Re: Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: Ravi
• Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• i'm tired, i'll have another chocolate
  • From: blaetterrascheln
• Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Sergei
• PGP deployment for small company, some questions
  • From: HG
• Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Sergei
• Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: Unruh
• zk-proof on ElGamal ciphertext
  • From: Xi Yung
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: kurt wismer
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Sergei
• Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: Cristiano
• Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?
  • From: Sergei
• Re: Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: Ravi
• Re: Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: Ravi
• Re: Graphical test results
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Update: AntiSpam Images (CAPTCHA)
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Update: AntiSpam Images (CAPTCHA)
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: David Eather
• Graphical test results
  • From: peter_pan
• Graphical test results
  • From: peter_pan
• Graphical test results`
  • From: peter_pan
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Update: AntiSpam Images (CAPTCHA)
  • From: bytebro
• Re: Update: AntiSpam Images (CAPTCHA)
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: to encrypt floating point numbers
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Update: AntiSpam Images (CAPTCHA)
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: to encrypt floating point numbers
  • From: davvid_a_scott
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Update: AntiSpam Images (CAPTCHA)
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: TC
• Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption
  • From: ganjatoker
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: da5id65536
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: da5id65536
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: TC
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: TC
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: TC
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: key algorithm
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: key algorithm
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: TC
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Paul Rubin
• key algorithm
  • From: mistral
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: to encrypt floating point numbers
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Secret code with easily remembered code for user
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Secret code with easily remembered code for user
  • From: rrrobertsson
• Re: [OT] Isolated differentials question
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: TC
• Re: [OT] Isolated differentials question
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: boomboom999
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: TC
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: kurt wismer
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: to encrypt floating point numbers
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• KRONOS : Key management protocol
  • From: Darth
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: TC
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: TC
• Re: to encrypt floating point numbers
  • From: ravikumar . kothuri
• Re: to encrypt floating point numbers
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: to encrypt floating point numbers
  • From: Tom St Denis
• to encrypt floating point numbers
  • From: ravikumar . kothuri
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: TC
• Re: Simple anti-phishing idea (browser extension)
  • From: Ignoramus3520
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: boomboom999
• Re: [OT] Isolated differentials question
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: PING: rossum
  • From: Antony Clements
• [OT] Isolated differentials question
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: PING: rossum
  • From: rossum
• Re: Dr Gladman's "modes" library
  • From: bytebro
• Re: Dr Gladman's "modes" library
  • From: BRG
• Re: Dr Gladman's "modes" library
  • From: bytebro
• Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: Dave -Turner
• PING: rossum
  • From: Antony Clements
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: JiXian Yang
• Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability
  • From: boomboom999
• Re: Undeciphered Templar Symbols
  • From: Jimserac
• Re: Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Simon Johnson
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Alan
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• What's wrong with BassOmatic?
  • From: Nathan
• Re: Dr Gladman's "modes" library
  • From: BRG
• International Company Now Hiring.(5662)
  • From: ratmledwho
• Re: Dr Gladman's "modes" library
  • From: BRG
• Re: Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: JiXian Yang
• Re: Simple anti-phishing idea (browser extension)
  • From: Don Lancaster
• Re: Dr Gladman's "modes" library
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Dr Gladman's "modes" library
  • From: bytebro
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: Bill
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: Tomcrypt lib together with WinAVR
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: David Eather
• Re: How serious is AES timing flaw?
  • From: BRG
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: hoz
• Re: How serious is AES timing flaw?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: William Ahern
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: kurt wismer
• Re: How serious is AES timing flaw?
  • From: James A . Donald
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: James A . Donald
• Re: How serious is AES timing flaw?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• How serious is AES timing flaw?
  • From: James A . Donald
• Re: Efficient message authentication?
  • From: James A . Donald
• Re: Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: William Ahern
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: Will Dickson
• Re: Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: hash function for random generator
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Who Says It Can't Be Done?
  • From: Bill Foster
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: oppermann
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: oppermann
• Re: Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: oppermann
• Re: Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: oppermann
• Re: Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: oppermann
• Re: Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Hash for IP address pairs
  • From: oppermann
• hash function for random generator
  • From: Ravi
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: William Ahern
• Rand generator (MD5)
  • From: Ravi
• Re: Tomcrypt lib together with WinAVR
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Tomcrypt lib together with WinAVR
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Ben Livengood
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Ideas please
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Ideas please
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Efficient message authentication?
  • From: Alexander Bernauer
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: Alexander Bernauer
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Bill Cox
• International Company Now Hiring.(5662)
  • From: ratmledwho
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: giorgio.tani
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: hoz
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: hoz
• Re: Tomcrypt lib together with WinAVR
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: David Eather
• Re: a problem about zero-knowledge proof or secret computation
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: ecco
• Re: Probability of duplicate public/private key pairs?
  • From: rossum
• International Company Now Hiring.(5662)
  • From: bohara . suman
• International Company Now Hiring5662
  • From: bohara . suman
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: BRG
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: hoz
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: Probability of duplicate public/private key pairs?
  • From: antonyliu2002@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: a problem about zero-knowledge proof or secret computation
  • From: Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Booted Cat
• Re: Strange puzzle
  • From: Luc The Perverse
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Strange puzzle
  • From: Matt Eisner
• Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: BRG
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: BRG
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: ecco
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: Vincent Rijmen
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: BRG
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: BRG
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: BRG
• Re: Undeciphered Templar Symbols
  • From: TC
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: BRG
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: BRG
• Re: Probability of duplicate public/private key pairs?
  • From: clark
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: Tomcrypt lib together with WinAVR
  • From: larsson . steve
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: cactus
• Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Efficient message authentication?
  • From: James A . Donald
• Re: Probability of duplicate public/private key pairs?
  • From: Scott Contini
• Undeciphered Templar Symbols
  • From: Jimserac
• Re: Probability of duplicate public/private key pairs?
  • From: Jonnie
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: Peter Fairbrother
• Probability of duplicate public/private key pairs?
  • From: antonyliu2002@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: Rob Warnock
• Re: Efficient message authentication?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection
  • From: ecco
• Re: Efficient message authentication?
  • From: James A . Donald
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey
  • From: James A . Donald
• Re: Efficient message authentication?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Efficient message authentication?
  • From: James A . Donald
• Re: Tomcrypt lib together with WinAVR
  • From: fortune . bruce
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: David R. Tribble
• Re: AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: International Company Now Hiring.(5897)
  • From: Jonnie
• Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext
  • From: secretcodebreaker
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: Alexander Bernauer
• Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: Alexander Bernauer
• Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: Alexander Bernauer
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Francois Grieu
• International Company Now Hiring.(5897)
  • From: suman
• Tomcrypt lib together with WinAVR
  • From: larsson . steve
• TomCrypt using AVR
  • From: larsson . steve
• AES Galois Field Inverse
  • From: BRG
• Too many Fortuna pools
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: mm
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Roger Schlafly
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: a problem about zero-knowledge proof or secret computation
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• a problem about zero-knowledge proof or secret computation
  • From: challengerlee
• Re: Null test over
  • From: Sean Joones
• Re: Null test over
  • From: Sean Joones
• Re: Null test over
  • From: Johnny
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: mm
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Bodo Moeller
• JSH: Null test over
  • From: jstevh
• Nigerian Physicist invents 100+ Years Advanced Video Game System
  • From: newstips6706
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: cbc mode - why IV and not random first block
  • From: Unruh
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: cbc mode - why IV and not random first block
  • From: Jens Müller
• Re: cbc mode - why IV and not random first block
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Wounded Tiger
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: Valery Pryamikov
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: cbc mode - why IV and not random first block
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: cbc mode - why IV and not random first block
  • From: Jens Müller
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: Wounded Tiger
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: mm
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: mm
• Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: finding password
  • From: mistral
• Re: cbc mode - why IV and not random first block
  • From: Nephi
• Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: David Wagner
• cbc mode - why IV and not random first block
  • From: Jens Müller
• nada
  • From: Boxite
• check
  • From: Jonh
• decoded
  • From: Jonh
• Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: Where is Joe Peschel's DOE SysWorks
  • From: clark
• Re: JSH: I am not happy
  • From: guenther vonKnakspot
• enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms
  • From: Alexander Bernauer
• Re: ANNOUNCE: jscryptor has been 1-upped by SimpleHide?
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: ANNOUNCE: jscryptor has been 1-upped by SimpleHide?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: ANNOUNCE: jscryptor has been 1-upped by SimpleHide?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Wounded Tiger
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: Wounded Tiger
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: ANNOUNCE: jscryptor has been 1-upped by SimpleHide?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: JSH: I am not happy
  • From: jshsucks
• Re: JSH: I am not happy
  • From: willo_thewisp
• JSH: I am not happy
  • From: jstevh
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: mm
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: front-padding with plaintext tail to disguise message length and reduce plaintext attack
  • From: rossum
• Re: finding password
  • From: Unruh
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: ANNOUNCE: jscryptor has been 1-upped by SimpleHide?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: ANNOUNCE: jscryptor has been 1-upped by SimpleHide?
  • From: d
• Re: finding password
  • From: mistral
• Re: front-padding with plaintext tail to disguise message length and reduce plaintext attack
  • From: David Wagner
• front-padding with plaintext tail to disguise message length and reduce plaintext attack
  • From: d
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Wounded Tiger
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Wounded Tiger
  • From: dtek96
• Re: finding password
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: ANNOUNCE: jscryptor has been 1-upped by SimpleHide?
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: finding password
  • From: giorgio.tani
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: finding password
  • From: mistral
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Bill Cox
• Re: finding password
  • From: rossum
• Re: finding password
  • From: giorgio.tani
• Re: finding password
  • From: giorgio.tani
• Re: finding password
  • From: mistral
• Re: finding password
  • From: Ludovic Joly
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: mm
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: finding password
  • From: rossum
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Bodo Moeller
• Re: finding password
  • From: Unruh
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Mike Amling
• finding password
  • From: mistral
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript
  • From: d
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Encrypting database
  • From: Volker Hetzer
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Where is Joe Peschel's DOE SysWorks
  • From: secretcodebreaker
• Re: CAPTCHA email images
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: rossum
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: CAPTCHA email images
  • From: David Eather
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: David Eather
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Question related to Diffie Hellman
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: How many Prime numbers
  • From: Francois Grieu
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Bodo Moeller
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Bodo Moeller
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Ben Livengood
• Re: urandom sufficient for SSL; entropy sharing
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: encrypt in c# and decrypt in c++
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Ben Livengood
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• Re: encrypt in c# and decrypt in c++
  • From: rossum
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: Dave
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Ben Livengood
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: rossum
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: mm
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: karl malbrain
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: John E. Hadstate
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: Dave
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: Dave
• Re: encrypt in c# and decrypt in c++
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Why Unbalanced Feistels Suck :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: How many Prime numbers
  • From: Tim Peters
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime
  • From: Joseph Ashwood
• Re: How many Prime numbers
  • From: L
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Peter S. May
• encrypt in c# and decrypt in c++
  • From: Steelx
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: CAPTCHA email images
  • From: Brian McKeever
• Re: urandom sufficient for SSL; entropy sharing
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: How many Prime numbers
  • From: Tim Peters
• Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript
  • From: d
• Re: How many Prime numbers
  • From: Pubkeybreaker
• Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: David Wagner
• Shamir sharing and GF(2^n)
  • From: Peter S. May
• How many Prime numbers
  • From: L
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: mistral
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: TC
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: mistral
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: mistral
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: TC
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: mistral
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: mistral
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: TC
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: mistral
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: TC
• Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext
  • From: Steph
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: 7429-International Company Now Hiring-7429
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Question related to Diffie Hellman
  • From: Mike Amling
• 7429-International Company Now Hiring-7429
  • From: adersonwil
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Question related to Diffie Hellman
  • From: cpptutor2000@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: mistral
• Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext
  • From: Steph
• Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext
  • From: Nathan
• Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext
  • From: Steph
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: jqpx37
• Re: Symmetric encryption: IND-CCA + INT-PTXT => INT-CTXT (almost!)
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: jqpx37
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript
  • From: mistral
• Re: Why Unbalanced Feistels Suck :-)
  • From: jsavard
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Encrypting database
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Encrypting database
  • From: TC
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Encrypting database
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Encrypting database
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Encrypting database
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript
  • From: mistral
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Encrypting database
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript
  • From: d
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Encrypting database
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: mistral
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Tim Smith
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: What data is encoded?
  • From: Phil Carmody
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: David Wagner
• ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript
  • From: d
• What data is encoded?
  • From: mistral
• Re: Encrypting database
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Unruh
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: fgrieu
• Re: Encrypting database
  • From: TC
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• M.peg biss key finder
  • From: Mike Usher
• Re: Encrypting database
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Encrypting database
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: jqpx37
• Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: Paul Rubin
• urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?
  • From: jqpx37
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: Encrypting database
  • From: Gordon Burditt
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Markus Jansson
• Re: Encrypting database
  • From: Mike Amling
• Encrypting database
  • From: Ivan Voras
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Ben Livengood
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: What's wrong with AES?
  • From: BRG
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• What's wrong with AES?
  • From: D. J. Bernstein
• Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext
  • From: crittenburg2006
• Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext
  • From: Harry Thompson
• Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext
  • From: rossum
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
  • From: Ben Livengood
• Re: Questions about Shamir secret sharing
  • From: Peter S. May
• Re: Tate pairing degeneracy
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: AES-CTR implementation
  • From: Paul Rubin
• How to approach decrypting Ciphertext
  • From: Sean
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: AES-CTR implementation
  • From: David Wagner
• Re: Signature Size for r and s
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: The ID Chip You Don't Want in Your Passport
  • From: Ari Silverstein
• Re: AES-CTR implementation
  • From: Mike Amling
• Re: Tate pairing degeneracy
  • From: Thomas Pornin
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
  • From: Cristiano
• Re: Tate pairing degeneracy
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Symmetric encryption: IND-CCA + INT-PTXT => INT-CTXT (almost!)
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: Questions about Shamir secret sharing
  • From: Peter Pearson
• Re: Symmetric encryption: IND-CCA + INT-PTXT => INT-CTXT (almost!)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Symmetric encryption: IND-CCA + INT-PTXT => INT-CTXT (almost!)
  • From: Mark Wooding
• Re: Why Unbalanced Feistels Suck :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Why Unbalanced Feistels Suck :-)
  • From: Jean-Luc Cooke
• Why Unbalanced Feistels Suck :-)
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Tate pairing degeneracy
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Re: AES-CTR implementation
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Re: Signature Size for r and s
  • From: Tom St Denis
• AES-CTR implementation
  • From: bytebro
• Re: Questions about Shamir secret sharing
  • From: Kristian Gjøsteen
• Instant realtime decryptor
  • From: mistral
• Re: Questions about Shamir secret sharing
  • From: Mike Scott
• Re: Salsa20 hashing
  • From: xmath
• Re: Questions about Shamir secret sharing
  • From: Peter S. May
• pmac_done() overrun bug in LTC [all versions]
  • From: Tom St Denis
• Signature Size for r and s
  • From: amzoti

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(15)