sci.crypt

• Date Index

---

• GeneralName.x400Address syntax, ba . hons
• Newbie question about AES encryption, Mark
  • Re: Newbie question about AES encryption, Peter Pearson
  • Re: Newbie question about AES encryption, Matthew Fanto
  • Re: Newbie question about AES encryption, TC
    • Re: Newbie question about AES encryption, Peter van Liesdonk
      • Re: Newbie question about AES encryption, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Newbie question about AES encryption, Tom St Denis
• MD5 for passwords, Ivan Voras
  • Re: MD5 for passwords, David Wagner
  • Re: MD5 for passwords, Unruh
  • Re: MD5 for passwords, Joseph Ashwood
• What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?, fabrice . gautier
  • Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?, Tom St Denis
    • Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?, fabrice . gautier
  • Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?, fabrice . gautier
      • Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?, fabrice . gautier
      • Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?, fabrice . gautier
      • Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?, Mark Wooding
      • Re: What does the MAC in IES or ECIES achieve ?, Kristian Gjøsteen
• desperate ??, flyawayteeks
• MAC autentication of several packets in sensor network questions, U Karlsson
  • Re: MAC autentication of several packets in sensor network questions, Tom St Denis
  • Re: MAC autentication of several packets in sensor network questions, David Wagner
    • Re: MAC autentication of several packets in sensor network questions, U Karlsson
    • Re: MAC autentication of several packets in sensor network questions, U Karlsson
• Another Dumb Idea for Debunking..., Bill Cox
  • Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking..., Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking..., Bill Cox
      • Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking..., TC
      • Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking..., Bill Cox
      • Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking..., TC
      • Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking..., TC
      • Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking..., Phil Carmody
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking..., Bill Cox
      • Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking..., TC
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Dumb Idea for Debunking..., Phil Carmody
• Re: JSH: Go with prime counting, Jesse F. Hughes
• Weak keys for ElGamal, Anton Berg
  • Re: Weak keys for ElGamal, David Wagner
    • Re: Weak keys for ElGamal, Anton Berg
      • Re: Weak keys for ElGamal, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Weak keys for ElGamal, David Wagner
      • Re: Weak keys for ElGamal, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Weak keys for ElGamal, David Eather
      • Re: Weak keys for ElGamal, Peter van Liesdonk
      • Re: Weak keys for ElGamal, David Wagner
  • Re: Weak keys for ElGamal, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Weak keys for ElGamal, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Weak keys for ElGamal, Anton Berg
      • Re: Weak keys for ElGamal, David Wagner
  • Re: Weak keys for ElGamal, Peter van Liesdonk
• Re: ADVERT: Secure communications, Peter S. May
  • Re: ADVERT: Secure communications, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: ADVERT: Secure communications, Peter S. May
  • Re: ADVERT: Secure communications, David Wagner
    • Point taken (Was Re: ADVERT: Secure communications), Peter S. May
  • Re: ADVERT: Secure communications, Mark Wooding
• Is it true, Joe?, david . florman
• Fermath, Giulia Biagini
• AES use of constant, amol
  • Re: AES use of constant, Jean-Luc Cooke
• Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Tom St Denis
  • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), JiXian Yang
    • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Tom St Denis
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), mm
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Tom St Denis
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), look
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Simon Johnson
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Paul Rubin
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Tom St Denis
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Peter Pearson
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), mm
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), mm
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), mm
      • Message not available
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), mm
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Tom St Denis
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), mm
      • Message not available
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), clark
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Tom St Denis
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), mm
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Tom St Denis
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), clark
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), clark
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), clark
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Paul Rubin
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), clark
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Paul Rubin
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), clark
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), look
      • Re: Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Luc The Perverse
  • [USENET] Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), me
    • Re: [USENET] Notice: My 2nd crypto book finished :-), Phil Carmody
• Math field, corrupted in late 1800's, jstevh
• Re:, Mike Amling
• A history lesson for Joe Peschel, david . florman
• OMAC coding, U Karlsson
  • Re: OMAC coding, David Wagner
    • Re: OMAC coding, U Karlsson
      • Re: OMAC coding, David Wagner
      • Re: OMAC coding, U Karlsson
      • Re: OMAC coding, David Wagner
      • Re: OMAC coding, U Karlsson
      • Re: OMAC coding, Tom St Denis
      • Re: OMAC coding, U Karlsson
      • Re: OMAC coding, David Wagner
      • Re: OMAC coding, U Karlsson
      • Re: OMAC coding, U Karlsson
    • Re: OMAC coding, Peter Pearson
• password strength, Sal
  • Re: password strength, pegguru
  • Re: password strength, David Wagner
    • Re: password strength, ink
      • Re: password strength, TC
      • Re: password strength, ink
      • Re: password strength, David Eather
      • Re: password strength, ink
      • Re: password strength, David Wagner
      • Re: password strength, ink
      • Re: password strength, Mike Amling
  • Re: password strength, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: password strength, Unruh
    • Re: password strength, Sal
      • Re: password strength, David Wagner
• Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt, xcong2000
  • Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt, Mike Scott
  • Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt, Luc The Perverse
    • Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt, xcong2000
      • Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt, Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt, xcong2000
      • Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt, Mike Amling
      • Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt, xcong2000
  • Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: Is it possible to encrypt a 10 character string to a 20 character string using Public key cypt, karl malbrain
• cracking DES ciphertext with known plaintext using custom character set., smith_ca
• COMPRENDRE LA CRYPTOLOGIE DANS LES CADRES REGLEMENTAIRE, REGULATEUR, LE REGIME JURIDIQUE DES TELECOMMUNICATIONS ET LES POSSIBLES APPLICATIONS AU CAMEROUN, MOMNOUGUI
  • Re: COMPRENDRE LA CRYPTOLOGIE DANS LES CADRES REGLEMENTAIRE, REGULATEUR, LE REGIME JURIDIQUE DES TELECOMMUNICATIONS ET LES POSSIBLES APPLICATIONS AU CAMEROUN, Tom St Denis
    • Re: COMPRENDRE LA CRYPTOLOGIE DANS LES CADRES REGLEMENTAIRE, REGULATEUR, LE REGIME JURIDIQUE DES TELECOMMUNICATIONS ET LES POSSIBLES APPLICATIONS AU CAMEROUN, MOMNOUGUI
• best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation, jesuraj.vinoth@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation, Tom St Denis
    • Re: best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation, Tom St Denis
  • Re: best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation, clark
    • Re: best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation, Tom St Denis
    • Message not available
      • Re: best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation, clark
  • Re: best sterm cipher for hardware implemenation, Mike Amling
• Black Dahlia cracked?, mike3
• Does something like this exist?, gmarkowsky
  • Re: Does something like this exist?, Paul Rubin
  • Re: Does something like this exist?, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Does something like this exist?, gmarkowsky
    • Re: Does something like this exist?, gmarkowsky
• Self Shrinking Generator, avigadl
  • Re: Self Shrinking Generator, Tom St Denis
• Questions about DH and MQVs, fabrice . gautier
  • Re: Questions about DH and MQVs, Tom St Denis
  • Re: Questions about DH and MQVs, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Questions about DH and MQVs, fabrice . gautier
      • Re: Questions about DH and MQVs, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Questions about DH and MQVs, fabrice . gautier
      • Re: Questions about DH and MQVs, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Questions about DH and MQVs, fabrice . gautier
• Server side encryption - Newbie, Mark
  • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Mark
      • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Mark
    • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Mark
      • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Mark
      • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Mark
      • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Ivan Voras
      • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, TC
      • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, Paul Rubin
    • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, rossum
  • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, TC
    • Re: Server side encryption - Newbie, TC
• CFP: APPLIED COMPUTING 2007 - Submission Deadline extended, natty2006@xxxxxxxxx
• Algorithm idea, mislavb
  • Re: Algorithm idea, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Algorithm idea, mislavb
      • Re: Algorithm idea, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Algorithm idea, mislavb
      • Re: Algorithm idea, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Algorithm idea, mislavb
      • Re: Algorithm idea, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Algorithm idea, mislavb
      • Re: Algorithm idea, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Algorithm idea, mislavb
      • Re: Algorithm idea, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Algorithm idea, mislavb
  • Re: Algorithm idea, Unruh
    • Re: Algorithm idea, mislavb
      • Re: Algorithm idea, Unruh
      • Re: Algorithm idea, mislavb
  • Re: Algorithm idea, mike3
• Article on Authentidate's Proving Test, mh
  • Re: Article on Authentidate's Proving Test, David Wagner
    • Re: Article on Authentidate's Proving Test, mh
      • Re: Article on Authentidate's Proving Test, David Wagner
      • Re: Article on Authentidate's Proving Test, mh
• Formal proofs of security, Paul Rubin
  • Re: Formal proofs of security, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: Formal proofs of security, David Wagner
• comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
  • Message not available
    • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: comments on cipher please, TC
      • Message not available
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
  • Re: comments on cipher please, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Matthew Fanto
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Matthew Fanto
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Matthew Fanto
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Tom St Denis
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Matthew Fanto
      • Re: comments on cipher please, TC
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, David Wagner
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, David Wagner
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, David Wagner
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, David Wagner
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Message not available
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Tom St Denis
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Tom St Denis
      • Re: comments on cipher please, me
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Tom St Denis
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Phil Carmody
      • Message not available
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, TC
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
  • Re: comments on cipher please, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
      • Re: comments on cipher please, David Eather
      • Re: comments on cipher please, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: comments on cipher please, rossum
    • Re: comments on cipher please, Antony Clements
• is there any way that have a lightweight transmission overhead in broadcast encryption, chir0
  • Re: is there any way that have a lightweight transmission overhead in broadcast encryption, Ele C . Tron
• TomsFastMath ported to the AVR32 [and looking for help], Tom St Denis
  • Re: TomsFastMath ported to the AVR32 [and looking for help], Phil Carmody
    • Re: TomsFastMath ported to the AVR32 [and looking for help], Tom St Denis
• meaning of correctness property, HyperCracking
  • Re: meaning of correctness property, Kristian Gjøsteen
• Yao's Millionaire Problem, jjb
  • Re: Yao's Millionaire Problem, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
    • Re: Yao's Millionaire Problem, jjb
      • Re: Yao's Millionaire Problem, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
• Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, mike3
    • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, David Eather
      • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, David Eather
  • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, Julio C. Hernandez Castro
    • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, TC
      • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, mike3
    • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, Joseph Ashwood
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, Unruh
    • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, Phil Carmody
      • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, Paul Rubin
      • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, mike3
      • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, Unruh
  • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, mike3
    • Re: New lightweight block cipher algorithm, David Eather
• Program to decode scytale cypher, Tobias Matzat
• Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?, Dilbertarian
  • Message not available
    • Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?, Tom St Denis
      • Message not available
      • Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?, Tom St Denis
      • Message not available
      • Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Message not available
    • Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?, François Grieu
  • Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?, Joseph Ashwood
    • Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?, Francois Grieu
      • Re: Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?, Phil Carmody
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Algorithm for quick Fermat test ?, Dilbertarian
• Need 802.11-1999 FHSS test vectors, bardia . alavi
• a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
  • Re: a few questions about AES, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: a few questions about AES, Mark Wooding
    • Re: a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
      • Re: a few questions about AES, mfanto
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
    • Re: a few questions about AES, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: a few questions about AES, mike3
    • Re: a few questions about AES, Johnny Bravo
    • Re: a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Luc The Perverse
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
      • Re: a few questions about AES, TC
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
      • Re: a few questions about AES, TC
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Unruh
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
      • Re: a few questions about AES, TC
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
      • Re: a few questions about AES, John E. Hadstate
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Phil Carmody
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Phil Carmody
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
      • Re: a few questions about AES, David Eather
      • Re: a few questions about AES, Antony Clements
• breaking 1 block of ciphertext encrypted using 3TDES, marvind
  • Message not available
    • Re: breaking 1 block of ciphertext encrypted using 3TDES, marvind
      • Message not available
      • Re: breaking 1 block of ciphertext encrypted using 3TDES, marvind
  • Re: breaking 1 block of ciphertext encrypted using 3TDES, Scott Fluhrer
    • Re: breaking 1 block of ciphertext encrypted using 3TDES, marvind
  • Re: breaking 1 block of ciphertext encrypted using 3TDES, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: breaking 1 block of ciphertext encrypted using 3TDES, clark
• Re: 2.5, Peter S. May
  • Re: 2.5, John E. Hadstate
• i'm tired, i'll have another chocolate, blaetterrascheln
  • Re: i'm tired, i'll have another chocolate, Anabaena Microcystis
  • Re: i'm tired, i'll have another chocolate, Ari Silverstein
    • Re: i'm tired, i'll have another chocolate, Deryck
      • Re: i'm tired, i'll have another chocolate, Luc The Perverse
      • Re: i'm tired, i'll have another chocolate, Ari Silverstein
    • Re: i'm tired, i'll have another chocolate, David Eather
• PGP deployment for small company, some questions, HG
• zk-proof on ElGamal ciphertext, Xi Yung
  • Re: zk-proof on ElGamal ciphertext, Mark Wooding
    • Re: zk-proof on ElGamal ciphertext, Xi Yung
      • Re: zk-proof on ElGamal ciphertext, Mark Wooding
      • Re: zk-proof on ElGamal ciphertext, Xi Yung
      • Re: zk-proof on ElGamal ciphertext, Xi Yung
      • Re: zk-proof on ElGamal ciphertext, Mark Wooding
• Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Sergei
  • Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Sergei
      • Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Sergei
      • Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Sergei
      • Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Sergei
      • Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Sergei
      • Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Sergei
      • Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Question on definition of semantic security: why "probability ensemble"?, Sergei
• Graphical test results, peter_pan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Graphical test results, peter_pan
    • Re: Graphical test results, Jean-Luc Cooke
• Graphical test results`, peter_pan
• Update: AntiSpam Images (CAPTCHA), Jean-Luc Cooke
  • Message not available
    • Re: Update: AntiSpam Images (CAPTCHA), Jean-Luc Cooke
  • Re: Update: AntiSpam Images (CAPTCHA), Ivan Voras
    • Re: Update: AntiSpam Images (CAPTCHA), Jean-Luc Cooke
  • Re: Update: AntiSpam Images (CAPTCHA), bytebro
    • Re: Update: AntiSpam Images (CAPTCHA), Jean-Luc Cooke
• Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, ganjatoker
  • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, rossum
    • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, TC
      • Re: Jetico BestCrypt Volume Encryption, Tom St Denis
• key algorithm, mistral
  • Re: key algorithm, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: key algorithm, Tom St Denis
• Secret code with easily remembered code for user, rrrobertsson
  • Re: Secret code with easily remembered code for user, Paul Rubin
• KRONOS : Key management protocol, Darth
• to encrypt floating point numbers, ravikumar . kothuri
  • Re: to encrypt floating point numbers, Tom St Denis
  • Re: to encrypt floating point numbers, Paul Rubin
    • Re: to encrypt floating point numbers, ravikumar . kothuri
      • Re: to encrypt floating point numbers, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: to encrypt floating point numbers, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: to encrypt floating point numbers, davvid_a_scott
      • Re: to encrypt floating point numbers, Jean-Luc Cooke
• [OT] Isolated differentials question, Will Dickson
  • Re: [OT] Isolated differentials question, Mike Amling
    • Re: [OT] Isolated differentials question, Will Dickson
      • Re: [OT] Isolated differentials question, Mike Amling
• PING: rossum, Antony Clements
  • Re: PING: rossum, rossum
    • Re: PING: rossum, Antony Clements
• Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, boomboom999
  • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Dave -Turner
    • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, boomboom999
  • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, TC
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, TC
      • Message not available
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, TC
      • Message not available
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, TC
      • Message not available
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Ari Silverstein
      • Message not available
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Ari Silverstein
      • Message not available
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, David Eather
      • Message not available
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, David Eather
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Ari Silverstein
      • Message not available
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Ari Silverstein
      • Message not available
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Ari Silverstein
      • Message not available
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, TC
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, TC
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, TC
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, TC
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Ari Silverstein
    • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, boomboom999
      • Message not available
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, TC
      • Message not available
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Utimaco Safeguard Easy vulnerability, TC
• What's wrong with BassOmatic?, Nathan
• Re: Simple anti-phishing idea (browser extension), Don Lancaster
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Simple anti-phishing idea (browser extension), Ignoramus3520
• Dr Gladman's "modes" library, bytebro
  • Re: Dr Gladman's "modes" library, Tom St Denis
  • Re: Dr Gladman's "modes" library, BRG
    • Re: Dr Gladman's "modes" library, bytebro
      • Re: Dr Gladman's "modes" library, BRG
      • Re: Dr Gladman's "modes" library, bytebro
  • Re: Dr Gladman's "modes" library, BRG
• How serious is AES timing flaw?, James A . Donald
  • Re: How serious is AES timing flaw?, Tom St Denis
    • Re: How serious is AES timing flaw?, James A . Donald
      • Re: How serious is AES timing flaw?, Unruh
  • Re: How serious is AES timing flaw?, BRG
• Who Says It Can't Be Done?, Bill Foster
• Hash for IP address pairs, oppermann
  • Re: Hash for IP address pairs, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Hash for IP address pairs, oppermann
  • Re: Hash for IP address pairs, David Wagner
    • Re: Hash for IP address pairs, oppermann
      • Re: Hash for IP address pairs, David Wagner
      • Re: Hash for IP address pairs, oppermann
      • Re: Hash for IP address pairs, oppermann
      • Re: Hash for IP address pairs, oppermann
  • Re: Hash for IP address pairs, David Wagner
    • Re: Hash for IP address pairs, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Hash for IP address pairs, David Wagner
      • Re: Hash for IP address pairs, Rob Warnock
  • Re: Hash for IP address pairs, Mike Amling
  • Re: Hash for IP address pairs, Joseph Ashwood
• hash function for random generator, Ravi
  • Re: hash function for random generator, Jean-Luc Cooke
• Rand generator (MD5), Ravi
  • Re: Rand generator (MD5), Unruh
  • Re: Rand generator (MD5), Bill
  • Re: Rand generator (MD5), JiXian Yang
    • Re: Rand generator (MD5), Ravi
      • Re: Rand generator (MD5), Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: Rand generator (MD5), Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: Rand generator (MD5), Unruh
      • Re: Rand generator (MD5), Ravi
      • Re: Rand generator (MD5), Luc The Perverse
      • Re: Rand generator (MD5), Unruh
      • Re: Rand generator (MD5), Ravi
      • Re: Rand generator (MD5), Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: Rand generator (MD5), Unruh
      • Re: Rand generator (MD5), Jean-Luc Cooke
• Ideas please, Jean-Luc Cooke
  • Re: Ideas please, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Ideas please, Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: Ideas please, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Ideas please, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Ideas please, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Ideas please, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Ideas please, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Ideas please, kurt wismer
      • Re: Ideas please, Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: Ideas please, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Ideas please, Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: Ideas please, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Ideas please, David Wagner
      • Re: Ideas please, Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: Ideas please, Tom St Denis
    • Re: Ideas please, Peter S. May
    • Re: Ideas please, Alan
      • Re: Ideas please, Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: Ideas please, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Ideas please, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Ideas please, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Ideas please, Jean-Luc Cooke
  • Re: Ideas please, Paul Rubin
    • Re: Ideas please, Jean-Luc Cooke
  • Re: Ideas please, William Ahern
    • Re: Ideas please, Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: Ideas please, William Ahern
      • Re: Ideas please, Peter S. May
      • Re: Ideas please, William Ahern
      • Re: Ideas please, Peter S. May
      • Re: Ideas please, Ari Silverstein
  • Re: Ideas please, Volker Hetzer
    • Re: Ideas please, Paul Rubin
  • Re: Ideas please, Paul Rubin
    • Re: Ideas please, Peter S. May
      • Re: Ideas please, Paul Rubin
  • Re: Ideas please, Simon Johnson
    • Re: Ideas please, Ari Silverstein
  • Re: Ideas please, JiXian Yang
  • Re: Ideas please, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Ideas please, Tom St Denis
  • Re: Ideas please, David Eather
    • Re: Ideas please, David Wagner
      • Re: Ideas please, David Eather
      • Re: Ideas please, Ari Silverstein
  • Re: Ideas please, David Eather
    • Re: Ideas please, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Ideas please, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Ideas please, Mike Amling
      • Re: Ideas please, David Eather
      • Re: Ideas please, Mike Amling
      • Re: Ideas please, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Ideas please, Mike Amling
      • Re: Ideas please, Peter S. May
      • Re: Ideas please, Peter Pearson
      • Re: Ideas please, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Ideas please, Peter Pearson
      • Re: Ideas please, Peter S. May
      • Re: Ideas please, David Eather
      • Re: Ideas please, Ari Silverstein
• International Company Now Hiring.(5662), bohara . suman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • International Company Now Hiring.(5662), ratmledwho
• International Company Now Hiring5662, bohara . suman
• Strange puzzle, Matt Eisner
  • Re: Strange puzzle, Luc The Perverse
• Undeciphered Templar Symbols, Jimserac
  • Re: Undeciphered Templar Symbols, TC
    • Re: Undeciphered Templar Symbols, Jimserac
• Probability of duplicate public/private key pairs?, antonyliu2002@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Probability of duplicate public/private key pairs?, Jonnie
  • Re: Probability of duplicate public/private key pairs?, Scott Contini
    • Re: Probability of duplicate public/private key pairs?, clark
    • Re: Probability of duplicate public/private key pairs?, antonyliu2002@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Probability of duplicate public/private key pairs?, rossum
• CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, ecco
  • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, David Wagner
    • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, ecco
  • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, Ivan Voras
    • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, David Wagner
      • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, hoz
      • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, ecco
      • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, hoz
      • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, giorgio.tani
      • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, David Wagner
      • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, David Eather
      • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, hoz
      • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, David Eather
      • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, David Wagner
      • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, hoz
      • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, David Wagner
      • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, Will Dickson
      • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, David Wagner
      • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, James A . Donald
  • Re: CBC-MAC instead of a CRC for non-malicious error detection, Alexander Bernauer
• Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, James A . Donald
  • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, Ari Silverstein
    • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, kurt wismer
      • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, kurt wismer
      • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, kurt wismer
      • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, kurt wismer
      • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, kurt wismer
      • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, kurt wismer
      • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, Ari Silverstein
      • Re: Fingerprint as cryptokey, Ari Silverstein
• Efficient message authentication?, James A . Donald
  • Re: Efficient message authentication?, Paul Rubin
    • Re: Efficient message authentication?, James A . Donald
      • Re: Efficient message authentication?, Paul Rubin
      • Re: Efficient message authentication?, James A . Donald
      • Re: Efficient message authentication?, Alexander Bernauer
      • Re: Efficient message authentication?, James A . Donald
• International Company Now Hiring.(5897), suman
  • Re: International Company Now Hiring.(5897), Jonnie
  • International Company Now Hiring.(5662), ratmledwho
• Tomcrypt lib together with WinAVR, larsson . steve
  • Re: Tomcrypt lib together with WinAVR, fortune . bruce
    • Re: Tomcrypt lib together with WinAVR, larsson . steve
      • Re: Tomcrypt lib together with WinAVR, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Tomcrypt lib together with WinAVR, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Tomcrypt lib together with WinAVR, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Tomcrypt lib together with WinAVR, Tom St Denis
• TomCrypt using AVR, larsson . steve
• AES Galois Field Inverse, BRG
  • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, Phil Carmody
    • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, Peter Fairbrother
      • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, BRG
  • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, Rob Warnock
    • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, cactus
    • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, Dave Thompson
  • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, Thomas Pornin
    • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, Rob Warnock
      • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, BRG
    • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, BRG
      • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, Vincent Rijmen
      • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, BRG
      • Message not available
      • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, BRG
    • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, BRG
      • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, BRG
      • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, Thomas Pornin
      • Re: AES Galois Field Inverse, BRG
• Too many Fortuna pools, Mike Amling
• a problem about zero-knowledge proof or secret computation, challengerlee
  • Re: a problem about zero-knowledge proof or secret computation, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: a problem about zero-knowledge proof or secret computation, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
    • Re: a problem about zero-knowledge proof or secret computation, Mark Wooding
• JSH: Null test over, jstevh
  • Re: Null test over, Johnny
    • Re: Null test over, Sean Joones
  • Re: Null test over, Sean Joones
• Nigerian Physicist invents 100+ Years Advanced Video Game System, newstips6706
• cbc mode - why IV and not random first block, Jens Müller
  • Re: cbc mode - why IV and not random first block, Nephi
    • Re: cbc mode - why IV and not random first block, Jens Müller
      • Re: cbc mode - why IV and not random first block, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: cbc mode - why IV and not random first block, Unruh
      • Re: cbc mode - why IV and not random first block, Jens Müller
      • Re: cbc mode - why IV and not random first block, Unruh
• nada, Boxite
• check, Jonh
• decoded, Jonh
• enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, Alexander Bernauer
  • Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, Jean-Luc Cooke
    • Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, David Wagner
      • Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, Tom St Denis
      • Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, Jean-Luc Cooke
      • Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, David Wagner
    • Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, Alexander Bernauer
      • Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, Mark Wooding
      • Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, Jean-Luc Cooke
  • Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, Mark Wooding
    • Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, Alexander Bernauer
  • Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, David Wagner
    • Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, Alexander Bernauer
      • Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, David Wagner
  • Re: enc and auth scheme with tiny cryptograms, Valery Pryamikov
• JSH: I am not happy, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: I am not happy, willo_thewisp
  • Re: JSH: I am not happy, jshsucks
  • Re: JSH: I am not happy, guenther vonKnakspot
• front-padding with plaintext tail to disguise message length and reduce plaintext attack, d
  • Re: front-padding with plaintext tail to disguise message length and reduce plaintext attack, David Wagner
  • Re: front-padding with plaintext tail to disguise message length and reduce plaintext attack, rossum
• Wounded Tiger, dtek96
  • Re: Wounded Tiger, Tom St Denis
  • Re: Wounded Tiger, Phil Carmody
    • Re: Wounded Tiger, Tom St Denis
      • Re: Wounded Tiger, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Wounded Tiger, Tom St Denis
• finding password, mistral
  • Re: finding password, Unruh
    • Re: finding password, Ludovic Joly
  • Re: finding password, rossum
    • Re: finding password, mistral
      • Re: finding password, giorgio.tani
      • Re: finding password, giorgio.tani
      • Re: finding password, rossum
      • Re: finding password, mistral
      • Re: finding password, giorgio.tani
      • Re: finding password, mistral
      • Re: finding password, Unruh
      • Re: finding password, Unruh
      • Re: finding password, mistral
• Where is Joe Peschel's DOE SysWorks, secretcodebreaker
  • Re: Where is Joe Peschel's DOE SysWorks, clark
• Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, Joseph Ashwood
  • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, mm
    • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, mm
      • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, mm
      • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, mm
      • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, mm
      • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, Phil Carmody
      • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, mm
      • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, Joseph Ashwood
      • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, Phil Carmody
      • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, mm
    • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, Mike Amling
      • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, Phil Carmody
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: find (n-1)/2 is prime, Tom St Denis
• encrypt in c# and decrypt in c++, Steelx
  • Re: encrypt in c# and decrypt in c++, Tom St Denis
  • Re: encrypt in c# and decrypt in c++, rossum
    • Re: encrypt in c# and decrypt in c++, Unruh
• Re: CAPTCHA email images, Brian McKeever
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: CAPTCHA email images, David Eather
    • Re: CAPTCHA email images, Jean-Luc Cooke
• Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Peter S. May
  • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), David Wagner
    • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Peter S. May
      • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Peter S. May
      • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Peter S. May
      • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Peter S. May
  • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Mark Wooding
    • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Peter S. May
      • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Mark Wooding
      • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Peter S. May
    • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Mark Wooding
      • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Shamir sharing and GF(2^n), Peter S. May
• How many Prime numbers, L
  • Re: How many Prime numbers, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: How many Prime numbers, Tim Peters
    • Re: How many Prime numbers, L
      • Re: How many Prime numbers, Tim Peters
  • Re: How many Prime numbers, Francois Grieu
• 7429-International Company Now Hiring-7429, adersonwil
  • Re: 7429-International Company Now Hiring-7429, Tom St Denis
• Question related to Diffie Hellman, cpptutor2000@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Question related to Diffie Hellman, Mike Amling
  • Re: Question related to Diffie Hellman, Joseph Ashwood
• ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript, d
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript, David Wagner
    • Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript, d
      • Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript, David Wagner
      • Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript, d
      • Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript, David Wagner
      • Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript, d
      • Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript, David Wagner
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript, mistral
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: "jscryptor: client-side web page encryption" using JavaScript, mistral
  • Re: ANNOUNCE: jscryptor has been 1-upped by SimpleHide?, Jean-Luc Cooke
    • Re: ANNOUNCE: jscryptor has been 1-upped by SimpleHide?, d
      • Re: ANNOUNCE: jscryptor has been 1-upped by SimpleHide?, Tom St Denis
    • Re: ANNOUNCE: jscryptor has been 1-upped by SimpleHide?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: ANNOUNCE: jscryptor has been 1-upped by SimpleHide?, Tom St Denis
      • Re: ANNOUNCE: jscryptor has been 1-upped by SimpleHide?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: ANNOUNCE: jscryptor has been 1-upped by SimpleHide?, Jean-Luc Cooke
• What data is encoded?, mistral
  • Re: What data is encoded?, Phil Carmody
    • Re: What data is encoded?, mistral
      • Re: What data is encoded?, Phil Carmody
    • Re: What data is encoded?, mistral
      • Re: What data is encoded?, Phil Carmody
  • Re: What data is encoded?, TC
    • Re: What data is encoded?, mistral
      • Re: What data is encoded?, TC
      • Re: What data is encoded?, mistral
      • Re: What data is encoded?, TC
      • Re: What data is encoded?, Phil Carmody
  • Re: What data is encoded?, Tom St Denis
  • Re: What data is encoded?, Tom St Denis
    • Re: What data is encoded?, mistral
      • Re: What data is encoded?, Tom St Denis
      • Re: What data is encoded?, mistral
      • Re: What data is encoded?, Tom St Denis
      • Re: What data is encoded?, mistral
      • Re: What data is encoded?, Tom St Denis
      • Re: What data is encoded?, TC
      • Re: What data is encoded?, mistral
      • Re: What data is encoded?, Dave
      • Re: What data is encoded?, Dave
      • Re: What data is encoded?, rossum
      • Re: What data is encoded?, Dave
      • Re: What data is encoded?, rossum
      • Re: What data is encoded?, Anne & Lynn Wheeler
• M.peg biss key finder, Mike Usher
• urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, jqpx37
  • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Paul Rubin
    • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, jqpx37
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Paul Rubin
  • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Unruh
  • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, David Wagner
  • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Mike Amling
    • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, David Wagner
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Mike Amling
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Unruh
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, jqpx37
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, jqpx37
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Mike Amling
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Paul Rubin
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Mike Amling
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, David Wagner
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Mike Amling
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, David Wagner
      • Re: urandom sufficient for SSL; entropy sharing, Mike Amling
      • Re: urandom sufficient for SSL; entropy sharing, David Wagner
      • Message not available
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Tom St Denis
      • Message not available
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Bodo Moeller
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Bodo Moeller
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Mike Amling
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Bodo Moeller
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Unruh
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Bodo Moeller
      • Message not available
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Unruh
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Roger Schlafly
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Unruh
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Unruh
      • Re: urandom sufficient for e.g. SSL?, Unruh
• Encrypting database, Ivan Voras
  • Re: Encrypting database, Mike Amling
    • Re: Encrypting database, Ivan Voras
      • Re: Encrypting database, Mike Amling
      • Re: Encrypting database, Ivan Voras
  • Re: Encrypting database, Gordon Burditt
    • Re: Encrypting database, Ivan Voras
  • Re: Encrypting database, TC
    • Re: Encrypting database, Ivan Voras
    • Re: Encrypting database, Mike Amling
      • Re: Encrypting database, TC
    • Re: Encrypting database, David Wagner
      • Re: Encrypting database, Ivan Voras
      • Re: Encrypting database, David Wagner
  • Re: Encrypting database, Volker Hetzer
• Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Ben Livengood
  • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Mike Amling
    • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Ben Livengood
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Mike Amling
    • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Mike Amling
    • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, fgrieu
      • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Ben Livengood
      • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Bill Cox
  • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Ben Livengood
    • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Ben Livengood
    • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Mike Amling
  • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Bill Cox
    • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Bill Cox
    • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Bill Cox
      • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Bill Cox
      • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Bill Cox
      • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Mike Amling
      • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Francois Grieu
      • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Francois Grieu
      • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Francois Grieu
      • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Bill Cox
      • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Ben Livengood
      • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Bill Cox
      • Re: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked, Booted Cat
• How to approach decrypting Ciphertext, Sean
  • Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext, rossum
    • Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext, Harry Thompson
  • Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext, Mike Amling
  • Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext, crittenburg2006
  • Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext, Steph
    • Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext, Nathan
      • Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext, Steph
      • Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext, Mike Amling
      • Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext, Steph
      • Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext, Mike Amling
  • Re: How to approach decrypting Ciphertext, secretcodebreaker
• Re: The ID Chip You Don't Want in Your Passport, Ari Silverstein
• Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, Cristiano
  • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, David Wagner
    • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, Cristiano
      • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, David Wagner
      • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, Cristiano
      • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, David Wagner
    • What's wrong with AES?, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, BRG
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, David Wagner
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Cristiano
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, David Wagner
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Cristiano
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, David Wagner
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, David Wagner
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Tim Smith
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, David Wagner
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Mike Amling
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Kristian Gjøsteen
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Markus Jansson
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, John E. Hadstate
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, karl malbrain
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, John E. Hadstate
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, karl malbrain
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, David Eather
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Unruh
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, John E. Hadstate
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Mike Amling
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Unruh
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, David Wagner
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, David R. Tribble
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Mike Amling
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Cristiano
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Mike Amling
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, David Eather
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Mike Amling
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Cristiano
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Mike Amling
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Cristiano
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Cristiano
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Cristiano
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Mike Amling
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Cristiano
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Mike Amling
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Cristiano
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Arthur J. O'Dwyer
      • Re: What's wrong with AES?, Mike Amling
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, da5id65536
    • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, Cristiano
      • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, David Eather
      • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, da5id65536
      • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, Cristiano
      • Message not available
      • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, Cristiano
      • Message not available
      • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, da5id65536
      • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, da5id65536
      • Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher, Cristiano
• Re: Symmetric encryption: IND-CCA + INT-PTXT => INT-CTXT (almost!), Mark Wooding
  • Re: Symmetric encryption: IND-CCA + INT-PTXT => INT-CTXT (almost!), Mark Wooding
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Symmetric encryption: IND-CCA + INT-PTXT => INT-CTXT (almost!), Tom St Denis
    • Re: Symmetric encryption: IND-CCA + INT-PTXT => INT-CTXT (almost!), Kristian Gjøsteen
• Why Unbalanced Feistels Suck :-), Tom St Denis
  • Re: Why Unbalanced Feistels Suck :-), Jean-Luc Cooke
    • Re: Why Unbalanced Feistels Suck :-), Tom St Denis
  • Re: Why Unbalanced Feistels Suck :-), jsavard
    • Re: Why Unbalanced Feistels Suck :-), Tom St Denis
• Re: Tate pairing degeneracy, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: Tate pairing degeneracy, Kristian Gjøsteen
    • Re: Tate pairing degeneracy, Thomas Pornin
      • Re: Tate pairing degeneracy, Kristian Gjøsteen
• AES-CTR implementation, bytebro
  • Re: AES-CTR implementation, Tom St Denis
  • Re: AES-CTR implementation, Mike Amling
  • Re: AES-CTR implementation, David Wagner
  • Re: AES-CTR implementation, Paul Rubin
• Instant realtime decryptor, mistral
• Re: Salsa20 hashing, xmath
• Re: Questions about Shamir secret sharing, Peter S. May
  • Re: Questions about Shamir secret sharing, Mike Scott
    • Re: Questions about Shamir secret sharing, Kristian Gjøsteen
  • Re: Questions about Shamir secret sharing, Peter Pearson
    • Re: Questions about Shamir secret sharing, Peter S. May
• pmac_done() overrun bug in LTC [all versions], Tom St Denis
• Signature Size for r and s, amzoti
  • Re: Signature Size for r and s, Tom St Denis
  • Re: Signature Size for r and s,