Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
- From: "Cristiano" <cristiano.pi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2006 21:32:11 +0200
Greg Rose wrote:
In article <451c0f6b$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Cristiano <cristiano.pi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Greg Rose wrote:
Your only justification is that it has a long period.
Without Mike's corrections my English becomes bad, but would you
quote the line in my message in which I talked about the period?
Sorry, my apologies, I mistyped. Your only
justification is that it has a high linear
complexity.
Now I should ask to quote the line in my message in which I said that, but I
have a better idea. I said: "Using the LSB of MT19937 to get a
self-shrinking generator, we get an attack complexity of O(2^13757) which
seems much bigger than the one of any stream cipher.". I don't know if that
is good English; let me know.
Cristiano
.
- References:
- Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
- From: Cristiano
- Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
- From: Cristiano
- Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
- From: Cristiano
- Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
- Prev by Date: Re: Hidden Encryption
- Next by Date: Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
- Previous by thread: Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
- Next by thread: Re: Self-shrinking MT19937 as stream cipher
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
