Re: XOR javascript implementation
- From: "mistral" <polychrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Sep 2006 07:53:40 -0700
rossum писал(а):
On 22 Sep 2006 05:22:14 -0700, "mistral" <polychrom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Mostly for encoding of javascript code. Need be only secure enough to
protect from Aunt Edna looking at source code and stop robots that try
research scripts. Nasty Megacorp Inc or reverse engineers is not
important, so no extra security required. And yes, encryption may not
required at all, encoding only. I use Base-64, but want to try other
encoding methods as well, probably simple encryption. I dont know yEnc
javascript implementaion. What is important that encryption provide
compact enough size(page need load fast) and must provide character
strings that fully recognized by browser. Otherwise javascript may not
work correctly.
-------------mistral
Sounds like Base-64 would solve your problem. It will be more
difficult to amend yEnc to avoid special characters as you would not
be able to use an off-the-shelf implementation.
rossum
what is correct inplementation of Base64 decoding function in
javascript?
mistral
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: XOR javascript implementation
- From: rossum
- Re: XOR javascript implementation
- References:
- XOR javascript implementation
- From: mistral
- Re: XOR javascript implementation
- From: Douglas . Linder
- Re: XOR javascript implementation
- From: Jean-Luc Cooke
- Re: XOR javascript implementation
- From: mistral
- Re: XOR javascript implementation
- From: rossum
- Re: XOR javascript implementation
- From: mistral
- Re: XOR javascript implementation
- From: rossum
- XOR javascript implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: The ID Chip You Don't Want in Your Passport
- Next by Date: Need Graph Isomorphism Algorithm De-bunked
- Previous by thread: Re: XOR javascript implementation
- Next by thread: Re: XOR javascript implementation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|